- Development & Aid
- Economy & Trade
- Human Rights
- Global Governance
- Civil Society
Saturday, June 25, 2022
NEW YORK, Sep 23 2011 (IPS) - Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s address to the United Nations Thursday followed the script of his previous six visits to New York, with strong criticism of the United States, messianic language, and vague utopian statements on how to govern the world, Iranian-style.
The address “was similar in tone and content to his previous six speeches. It was a mélange of anti-imperialism, anti-Zionism, conspiracy theory, and Shiite fervour,” Karim Sadjadpour, an Iran policy analyst at the Carnegie Endowment, told IPS.
“The first six times he gave the speech, many people were shocked and offended. But I think he has become so predictable that his words no longer have the same shock value. It would have been far more shocking had he given a dignified address,” he said.
British Prime Minister David Cameron, who spoke shortly after Ahmadinejad, harshly and directly criticised the human rights situation in Iran and its president.
“He didn’t remind us that he runs a country where they may have elections of a sort but they also repress freedom of speech, do everything they can to avoid the accountability of a free media, violently prevent demonstrations and detain and torture those who argue for a better future,” Cameron said.
However, just days before the pair were given bail, six Iranian documentary filmmakers were arrested by the intelligence service and later accused of cooperating with BBC Persian news channel and providing material for espionage activities.
They were taken into custody shortly after the news agency broadcasted a documentary about the life and politics of Ali Khamenei, Iran’s Supreme Leader.
“So we should never pretend that having elections is enough,” Cameron said, referring to Iran’s ongoing political and social crackdown.
Two of Ahmadinejad’s opponents have been under house arrest for the past six months, and hundreds of activists remain in jail for participating in peaceful protests after his disputed re-election in 2009.
“Ahmadinejad’s habitually vapid speeches at the U.N. this year was even more irrelevant and inconsequential in the context of the Palestinian bid for statehood,” Dr. Hamid Dabashi, a professor of Iranian studies and comparative literature at Columbia University, told IPS.
“The drama of this year has been the obscene speech of (U.S.) President (Barack) Obama preempting the Palestinian historic right to statehood and its regional and global echoes in the context of the Arab Spring,” he said.
“Ahmadinejad’s gibberish about global poverty, in the context of his own country’s deep economic woes, rising unemployment, expanded poverty line, and the cut in governmental subsidies, was as usual pompous and hypocritical, especially when compared to the principled position of Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey against Israel.”
On Sep. 20, dozens of pro-peace and anti-war U.S. advocacy groups and individuals met with Ahmadinejad, but the organisations were largely handpicked and did not press the president on human rights issues.
“In a similar meeting last year, a couple of people touched on the election and its aftermath in their questions,” an activist told IPS on the condition of anonymity as she was not permitted to speak on behalf of her organisation. “Apparently, that made them unhappy and this year they controlled everything to avoid a similar situation.”
“Regarding the diversity of the groups and organisations (that) attended, it seems that it’s being somehow narrowed down to a size and quality that affected the possibility of having an open dialogue with Ahmadinejad,” the source added. “The environment was set to control the flow of conversation between the invitees and the Iranian delegation.”
During his time in New York, Ahmadinejad also met with a number of editors and journalists, but some Iranian-American journalists who cover Iran for major publications in the U.S. were not allowed to attend.
“I believe the organisers wanted to invite those who might ask more general questions about Iran’s regional and international politics rather than those who might have asked Ahmadinejad questions about human rights and his domestic power struggles,” an Iranian-American journalist told IPS on the condition of anonymity.
“The succession of democratic uprisings in the Arab world and the increasing prominence of Turkey on the global scene more than ever expose the systemic mendacity, backwardness, incompetence, and ludicrous visage of the Islamic Republic,” Dabashi told IPS. “Standing in the same row of ignominy as the Islamic Republic are the United States, Israel, Saudi Arabia, and all other Arab potentates awaiting the judgment of history.”
IPS is an international communication institution with a global news agency at its core,
raising the voices of the South
and civil society on issues of development, globalisation, human rights and the environment
Copyright © 2022 IPS-Inter Press Service. All rights reserved. - Terms & Conditions
You have the Power to Make a Difference
Would you consider a $20.00 contribution today that will help to keep the IPS news wire active? Your contribution will make a huge difference.