|
A BRIEF HISTORICAL OVERVIEW OF THE
SUDANESE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH.
By John Gachie
Sudan, Africa’s largest country also leads
the continent in many other ways. It has the rare distinction
of being at the bottom of nearly all-social indices in human
development, ranging from poverty to education, life expectancy
to child mortality to name just a few.
To many observers and indeed, the Sudanese people the country
is one huge mess beset by human misery, death and terror on
unprecedented scale. It is a country haunted by its tragic
past and beholden to deep ethno-religious cleaverages stoked
by racial bigotry. In all these, the Sudan situation has been
overly oversimplified by some and misunderstood by others
depending on one’s perspective, ideology and political
persuasion.
However, the extent of the suffering, pain and sheer terror
of the victims of the Sudan has escaped the world’s
attention for decades with the attendant fall out and sheer
waste of the country’s prime resource – manpower.
In this regard, a cursory look at the country’s educational
system reveals the yarning gap that exists in the development
of a human resource base. According to United Nations statistics,
between 60-70 per cent of the population in Northern Sudan
are illiterate, while 80 to 90 per cent of the population
in South Sudan are illiterate. The national average is between
70 per cent in a population of about 30 million people.
There are many reasons that explain these statistics, but
the most primary is due to war and the attendant fall out.
Sudan has been at war with itself for over four decades since
independence in 1956 with a little more than a decade of relative
peace between 1972 and 1983.
Another reason, more of a historical nature is the colonial
legacy, especially during the British-Egyptian condominium
rule from late nineteenth century to 1956. During this period,
the country was administered as two distinct entities though
governed from the capital, Khartoum. The northern half of
the country was historically and culturally closer to Gulf
Arab culture and the education system as indeed all other
aspects social administration and service delivery were so
attuned.
The education system was aligned to the Islamic-Arab culture
and so too was the language of instruction especially in the
lower strata of education. Instruction in the English language
was introduced at the post secondary level education and the
curriculum was so set to inculcate an education rich in Islamic-Arab
ethos.
In the South, the education system was a replica of the Northern
system, but with a marked difference. While in the North,
the British-Egyptian administration did encourage pursuit
of education to post primary-school level, in the South post
primary-school level education was scorned and actively discouraged.
This was predicated on the assumption that such a policy would
alter and threaten the fragile social-cultural setting in
the South, which was more African. In a sense, education in
the South was treated as security issue in that it was feared
that to introduce a modern education would seriously alter
and affect the social structure and alter the traditional
power structures.
What was never publicly acknowledged was that there was a
joint understanding that the South would be left alone in
the scheme of things as a large reservoir of untrained labour
for the benefit of the North. Indeed, the British-Egyptian
administration provided the barest of minimum in educational
development of the South, leaving the bulk of the work to
Christian missionaries.
For those in the South and other marginalized areas of Sudan
that were outside the ambit of the ruling riverine Arab-merchant-cum-military
class, they were destined to be the cheap source of labour.
In this way, therefore, it was in the interest of the British-Egyptian
administration to do as little as possible in social service
delivery and especially so in education and infrastructural
development.
The justification was two-fold, namely that the riverine
Arab ruling class was more aligned and attached to the Egyptian
–Arab culture and shared their values and aspirations.
The British on the other hand were more interested in the
strategic imperial concerns of the British Empire especially
in the contested Gulf region and in the strategic approaches
of the Mediterranean Sea and the Suez Canal.
This congruence of interests between the Egyptians and the
British led to an alliance in the discriminatory practices
in social development of the rest of Sudan. The effect of
these policies led to a skewed socio-economic development
of the country. This was more manifested in the provision
of education and other social services in the country. The
riverine Arab-ruling class enjoyed disproportionate facilities
in education, health and other social services whose impact
and effect are still being felt today.
As a senior clergyman and a Southern Sudanese National, Rev
Clement Janda sums it up ‘The fate of the marginalized
people of the Sudan, especially in the South and in the Nuba
Mountains has been one of utter helplessness…. We were
destined to be slaves or indenture vassals providing only
raw physical energy and never the intellectual means’’.
A 2001 report on education commissioned by the Stromme Foundation
of Norway, puts it more aptly when it says ‘’
The legacy of the peoples of the South Sudan in all spheres
of life but in particular with regards to education is a very
sad and painful one….’’ it continues ‘‘
in pre-colonial times, with the Egyptian-Ottoman Empire, the
rejection of African values and cultures was the rule. Things
changed somewhat, but more in style than in content, with
the arrival of the British colonial power. The essential disregard
of the African values and cultures was upheld. To the extent
education was possible, it was very elementary or basic and
set to serve the needs of the British masters.’’.
The report notes that this disregard and utter contempt of
the non-Arab cultures and in particular, the African cultures
were pervasive, extensive and unrelenting. Towards this end,
in the run up to independence in 1956, there were concerted
efforts to impose the Arab-Muslim culture on the rest of non-Arab-Muslim
people of the Sudan.
Indeed, in their pursuit of hegemony over non-Arab-Muslim
peoples of the country, the most important avenue was education.
As the Stromme Foundation report notes ‘’ the
most important tool in this context was education. A more
distinct racial hierarchy of schooling emerged with all training
and in particular higher education favouring those of the
Arab-Muslim extraction and those few Africans who accepted
or were forced into assimilation of the Arab culture and religion.’’
As it is, the Sudan as a country faces myriad of problems,
ranging from war to poverty and a dysfunctional social-political
and economic system. This unholy alliance of woes finds its
manifestation in varied ways and the most striking is the
dismal state of education in the country with the all-attendant
fall out in human resource capacity and development.
Tragically, this is more felt in South Sudan, Nuba Mountains
and in other marginalized areas of the country and in particular
amongst the non-Arab-Muslim riverine ruling
class.
Currently, there a little more than 1000 primary schools
in the liberated part of South Sudan with a total pupil population
of a little more than 250,000 in a total population of between
8-10 million people in an area bigger than East Africa and
the Great Lakes region combined. There are less than 200 secondary
schools with student population slightly more than 2000 and
a total teaching force of 6340 in primary schools. Of this
total 364 are female with a pupil teacher ration of 34 to
one.
The Stromme Foundation report, the most recent on the state
of education in the South Sudan and Nuba Mountains captures
the dire situation with regard to education thus “ to
the extent it exists, it can be characterized as being community
based and financed, of poor quality and accessible to a very
small percentage of the population. Management and co-ordination
of education are either too weak or non-existent”.
|