Rising Threats to Minorities in Sudan, Russia, Philippines
Thalif Deen
UNITED NATIONS, Apr 27 (IPS) - The growing threats against minorities and ethnic groups - who are vulnerable
to mass killings and genocides - have significantly increased in three countries:
Sudan, Russia and the Philippines.
A new survey by the London-based Minority Rights Group International (MRG)
concludes that "governments which are most likely to kill their own people are
those who have done it before".
The annual survey, titled 'Peoples Under Threat' and released Tuesday, says
that Sudan, Russia and the Philippines are this year's top three major risers in
the annual global rankings for 2010.
"The most startling riser in the table this year is the Russian Federation,
which has risen seven places," says Mark Lattimer, MRG's executive director.
The current survey is the fifth in a series which seeks to identify peoples or
groups that are most under threat of genocide, mass killings or other
systematic violent repression.
Somalia, Sudan, Iraq and Afghanistan lead the rankings overall for 2010.
Pakistan, one of the major risers for the last two years, is sixth on the list.
And despite claims of recent progress, Somalia and Iraq remain entrenched in
the top three.
Both the Bantu and Gaboye in Somalia, and numerous minorities in Iraq
continue to face persecution in the context of ongoing conflict and inter-
community rivalry.
Although under-reported, says the latest survey, conflict has escalated again
both in Chechnya and in the neighbouring Russian republics of Ingushetia
and Dagestan.
With recent bombings on the Moscow underground, the combination of
circumstances is dangerously close to those that prevailed in 1999 before the
start of the second Chechen war, which caused the deaths of at least 25,000
civilians.
Asked about the role of the U.N. Human Rights Council in protecting the
rights of minorities, Lattimer told IPS the Geneva-based Council has criticised
the human rights records of all three countries singled out in the survey.
But any penal measures or sanctions against member states effectively
require a resolution of the U.N. Security Council, he added.
As a result of a U.N. human rights mission to Sudan, the Security Council
referred Sudan to the International Criminal Court (ICC), which approved an
arrest warrant against President Omar al-Bashir last year.
As a permanent member of the Security Council, Russia, on the other hand,
can of course veto any measures tabled against it, he said.
"But Russia is also sensitive to criticism by European institutions, including
the European Court of Human Rights which has censured Russia for its
conduct in the Chechen war and awarded compensation to victims of human
rights abuses," Lattimer added.
The survey also points out that the perspectives of the post-9/11 world have
recast, as wars of religion, minority struggles that are in many cases decades
old.
"Whether in South Sudan, the North Caucasus, Mindanao, Yemen or Xinjiang,
there is a tendency, particularly in the United States, to highlight the religious
aspects of situations which only a few years ago were regularly described as
ethnic conflicts," it says.
In fact, says the survey, it could be argued that both ethnic and religious
differences have primarily been abused by politicians - national and
international - either to mobilise or to stigmatise particular communities.
And that the real roots of such conflicts lie not in religious ideology but in
people's long-term economic marginalisation and their aspirations for
greater autonomy over their own affairs.
For one thing, since 9/11 governments of every political hue have become
adept at justifying the violent repression of minorities, particularly but not
exclusively Muslim minorities, under the banner of the war on terrorism, it
says.
At the same time, for governments or the international community to see
complex conflicts primarily through a religious lens suits the agenda of
Islamic extremists, who can claim impacts far beyond their often very limited
military capacities, the survey notes.
Finally, and perhaps more worryingly, if governments behave as if conflicts
are all about religion, then increasingly they become about religion.
"And once religious divisions become entrenched, conflicts can be much
harder to resolve," it says.
Asked about the effectiveness of the Human Rights Council, Lattimer told IPS
the Council remains an important forum for examining a state's minority
rights record, but it moves slowly and is largely limited to criticism rather
than action.
"It is also a body made up of states, where the powerful ones can use their
influence to dampen criticism," he noted.
All these factors, he said, make it poorly equipped for dealing with a crisis,
such as when an episode of mass killing occurs.
(END/2010)
Send your comments to the editor |
