| The Birth of Lulaology
By Sanjay Suri
The opening debate on globalisation at the Gigantinho made
it clear that everything at the WSF really began at the end
of October with the election of Luiz Inácio Lula da
Silva as president of Brazil.
Lula did not attend the opening debate on globalisation,
the bedrock debate of the forum. He did not have to, given
the spell he seemed to cast within the Gigantinho. The gathering
applauded every time his name was mentioned, which was often.
The sentiment was that his success at the polls underlined
and amplified everything being said at the Forum, transforming
the desirable into the doable.
The former union leader won on the slogan of a "decent
Brazil", director-general of the International Labour
Organisation (ILO) Juan Somavia said. "And decent Brazil
means decent jobs for its people."
I wish to congratulate the Brazilian people for their democratic
courage," Somavia added. "The financial markets
had been trying to intimidate Brazilians, but the people were
able to show their will. What the Brazilian people have done
has to be done now by people from other countries around the
world."
Lula’s victory "shows the kind of tensions we
have in this system of globalised capitalism," said Nicola
Bullard, of the Bangkok-based Focus on the Global South. "It
shows the democratic demands of people in conflict with the
undemocratic pressure from financial markets and institutions."
What usually goes by the name globalisation has "failed
to generate employment", Somavia continued. About 80
per cent of people of working age have no income security.
"This model of globalisation does not respond to the
needs of families and communities," he said. "We
must change it."
That change is possible everywhere, he added. "We changed
the dictatorship in Chile, and we will change this kind of
globalisation," he said. "That's what is coming
out of a meeting like this."
Somavia's key word is multiplication. "This is where
people gather for ideas to be multiplied," he said. "People
here must organise social forces for change within their regions
and within every region. We need a big world union against
globalisation. That's not easy. But if we just hold big strategic
debates in our own corners, then the result will be the same
as the result against dictatorships -- they lasted much longer
than they should
have."
The WSF is seeking to give concrete shape to that sentiment.
"We must deconstruct and reduce the power of the international
institutions such as the IMF, World Bank and the WTO and build
a new democracy at the international level," said Bullard.
"The most important thing we are doing here in this
debate at the WSF and over the coming years is to build a
common language for democracy at the international level so
that we can find the space, consensus and a common perspective
to reduce the power of these undemocratic institutions."
Bullard is not content to just speak out about them. "We
have to attack these institutions, dismantle them, dissolve
their power," she said. "We have to challenge the
assumptions that the only way to growth is to open your markets
to foreign investors. We have to use the resources of our
people to re-establish people's sovereignty over key economic
decisions."
If Lula can do it, so can everyone else, was the implicit
message of speaker after speaker.
|