Online version of TerraViva, the independent daily journal of the
World Social Forum

Versión online de TerraViva, el diario independiente del Foro Social Mundial

Inter Press Service - Home Page

World Social Forum - Porto Alegre , January 28, 2003



24/01/2003


25/01/2003


26/01/2003


27/01/2003


28/01/2003

Background


Terra Viva is an independent publication of IPS - Inter Press Service.

The opinions expressed in Terra Viva do not necessarily reflect the editorial views of IPS nor the official position of any of its sponsors.

IPS gratefully acknowledges the financial support received for this publication from: Novib Oxfam Netherlands and the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation.

The Commonwealth Foundation generously funded the participation of the following journalists:

Debra Anthony
Zarina Geloo
Marwaan Macan-Markar
Sanjay Suri
Kalinga Seneviratne


 

 


 

It’s All in the Numbers

By Zarina Geloo

In spite of the restrictive policies on the accumulation and storage of data in many countries of the Middle East, more Arab nations contributed to this year’s Social Summit report than last year’s.

Ziad Abdel Samad, executive director of Arab NGO for Development said from two countries (Egypt and Lebanon) in the last report, there were now seven countries that had provided statistics.

´´It is a problem for some to collect and send data because information of any social indicators is restricted and in some cases, prohibited. But this year civil society in the Arab world was vigilant and managed to do some research.

He attributes this to the growing need for "consolidating and alternative statistics given out by the United Nations and the World Bank, which were insufficient for their purpose. Society has also realised that they can use the data in the report as a lobbying tool in their work.’’

Editor Robert Bissio said the Social Watch Report was different from the Davos Competitor’s Report and the UN Human Development Report because the statistics were from national governments, they only provided information on situations and ranked countries and were unable furnish a critique because of their limited scope.

“We are not only interested in outcomes, but also progress on policy, measuring political will to implement programmes and measuring the quality of life and access to basic rights.“


Published Stories