|
HEALTH-ECONOMY:
Africans Assail Meagre Response to HIV-AIDS
By
Lewis Machipisa

Nigeria's
President Olusegun Obasanjo / Credit:
William Farrington |
UNITED
NATIONS, Jun 25 (IPS) - African leaders used the opening of
the UN General Assembly Special Session on HIV-AIDS Monday to
assail the international community's response to the deadly
epidemic for |
failing
to match the speed and seriousness with which the disease is infecting
their citizens.
Official
after official rose to drive home the message that the death of
more than 20 million people, mostly in sub-Saharan Africa, demands
that more money be committed to the fight.
''If
we all act decisively, we can redeem ourselves," Botswana President
Festus Mogae implored the high-level gathering.
"If
resolute and concerted action is not taken against the spread of
HIV/AIDS, the human death toll and suffering that will be inflicted
will be catastrophic," Mogae warned.
Nigerian
President Olusegun Obasanjo lamented that "Africa, a continent
already crippled with problems of underdevelopment, poverty, food
scarcity, internal conflicts and the heavy burden of external debt,
is the hardest hit by the HIV-AIDS pandemic.''
''Africa
must survive," Obasanjo declared.
UNAIDS,
the UN agency coordinating the world body's response to the pandemic,
estimates that 25.3 million people in sub-Saharan Africa are living
with HIV-AIDS, out of a worldwide total of 36.1 million.
Anti-retroviral
drugs are being touted as the most effective treatment for those
already infected and African delegates said secure access at lower
prices was a top priority. Many also scored the disappointing international
response to UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan's call for between seven
billion and ten billion dollars per year for a global fund to fight
AIDS and other health threats.
By
the time the UN talks end on Wednesday, the fund is unlikely to
have garnered more than one billion dollars in firm pledges, officials
warned.
Uganda,
a pioneer in AIDS control efforts since the 1980s, has pledged two
million dollars to the fund. Ugandan officials said they know this
is too little to make a serious impact and exhorted richer countries
to "contribute according to what is proportionate to their
resources."
Even
if fully financed, the fund will remain dwarfed by Africa's burden
of debt, officials and activists said.
Sub-Saharan
African countries pay 14.2 billion dollars each year to their foreign
creditors, including governments, multilateral lenders including
the World Bank and International Monetary Fund, and private banks,
according to the non-governmental organisation (NGO) Drop the Debt.
The US pledge to Annan's fund - 200 million dollars - is equivalent
to less than a week's debt servicing.
Drawing
on such statistics, some African delegates pressed for not only
increased spending on health but also the cancellation of foreign
debt so the resulting gains could be used to subsidise life-saving
treatments and offset the economic impact of HIV-AIDS.
''The
circumstance and the situation of HIV-AIDS underscore our call for
total cancellation of Africa's debts in favour of investment in
the social sector. If we are to be true partners in development,
the debt issue must be addressed in a comprehensive manner that
frees our resources to enable us fight the scourge of HIV-AIDS,''
Obasanjo insisted.
''African
countries need access to long-term international financing arrangements
in order to have viable sustained economic growth, generate adequate
resources and build capacities for poverty eradication and combating
HIV-AIDS, including total debt cancellation for poor and highly-indebted
countries,'' added Eriya Kategaya, Uganda's deputy prime minister.
African
delegates noted that Zambia, which is pitifully poor and where one
fifth of all adults have HIV, spends 100 million dollars more on
debt payments than on health. African leaders pressed their demands
for debt cancellation at a summit in Abuja, Nigeria, in April but
to their consternation, wealthy countries and multilateral lenders
have balked at decisive action.
Meanwhile,
the human and economic costs soar. Between 1990 and 1997, Africa's
per capita income growth was reduced from 1.1 percent to 0.4 percent
as a result of HIV-AIDS, according to the World Bank. Kenya's GDP
will be 15 percent lower in 2005 than it would have been if the
spread of HIV-AIDS had been curtailed.
Jacques
Diouf, director-general of the UN's Food and Agricultural Organisation,
said the cost of caring for a patient and meeting the subsequent
funeral expenses exceeds the average African farmer's annual income.
According
to Annan, AIDS, combined with underlying economic woes, is reversing
southern African gains in life expectancy. The average child born
between 2002 and 2010 likely will die before reaching 45 years of
age - compared to 58 years now.
Already,
children younger than five account for one in every four African
AIDS deaths, according to World Vision, an NGO. There are already
13 million AIDS orphans on the continent and, in the absence of
significant intervention, the number will rise to 30 million by
2010, the group warned.
By
then, it added, the cost of training replacements for the 14,460
teachers expected to die from HIV-AIDS in Tanzania alone will reach
21 million dollars.
Despite
the urgency of their needs, African leaders have had to temper their
demands for fear of alienating the wealthy nations that are the
inevitable sources of most of the money that will be needed.
Kenya's
President Daniel arap Moi appeared to capture their dilemma Monday.
''We are not a wealthy nation, but my people must at least be given
hope," he said.
''The
time has come when we are compelled to make a decision between the
lives of our people and the right of commercial interest. Human
life must surely come before anything else,'' Moi said in an apparent
reference to Western drug makers who oppose poor countries' efforts
to manufacture generic AIDS drugs at a small fraction of the prices
charged by the multinational firms. "Our choice is therefore
made."
The
manufacturers of brand name drugs have argued, among other things,
that competition from cheaper products is squeezing their profit
margins and will limit their research budgets.
Faced
with an argument that amounts to an ultimatum made by the firms
and repeated by US and other delegates from the companies' home
countries, Moi added: ''Nonetheless, we must pursue our choice in
a balanced way, balanced to protect the interests of further research
and development so that life can be further protected and enhanced.''
(END/IPS)
|