Sunday, November 22, 2009   07:20 GMT    
IPS Direct to Your Inbox!
 - Africa
 - Asia-Pacific
     Afghanistan
     Iran
 - Caribbean
      Haiti
 - Europe
      Union in Diversity
 - Latin America
 - Mideast &
   Mediterranean
      Iraq
      Israel/Palestine
 - North America
      Neo-Cons
      Bush's Legacy
Agencia de Noticias Inter Press Service
Agencia de Noticias Inter Press Service
Subscribe
Agencia de Noticias Inter Press Service
Agencia de Noticias Inter Press Service
 - Development
      MDGs
      City Voices
      Corruption
 - Civil Society
 - Globalisation
 - Environment
      Energy Crunch
      Climate Change
      Tierramérica
 - Human Rights
 - Health
      HIV/AIDS
 - Indigenous Peoples
 - Economy & Trade
 - Labour
 - Population
     Reproductive Rights
     Migration&Refugees
 - Arts &
          Entertainment
 - Education
 - In Focus
Languages
   ENGLISH
   ESPAÑOL
   FRANÇAIS
   ARABIC
   DEUTSCH
   ITALIANO
   JAPANESE
   NEDERLANDS
   PORTUGUÊS
   SUOMI
   SVENSKA
   SWAHILI
   TÜRKÇE
IPS Inter Press Service News Agency
PrintSend to a friend
POLITICS-IRAN: Unease Grows over a U.S. Neighbourhood
By Ramim Mostaghim

TEHERAN, Apr 28 (IPS) - In a political world divided between conservatives and reformists, many leaders in Iran seem to be getting uneasy over an administration being run by the U.S. in neighbouring Iraq.

"For the time being America is Iran's next door neighbour, and will be there for two years," columnist Ali Salehabadi wrote in the reformist daily Habastegi. "This phenomenon is very threatening and complicated. We should therefore adopt a strategy with America cautiously, and based on a clear vision. Whether we cooperate with America or not, we need a correct response."

Few agree in Teheran what that correct response should be. Divisions over the U.S. are widening by the day. Publications like Yaletharat and Dokoheh which are the mouthpieces of radical militias want to provoke confrontation with U.S. forces. They focus on the human toll of the Iraq war, and project Osama bin Laden and the Taliban as a form of reistance against invasion.

Publications like Resalat and Kayhan on the other hand are calling for a more pragmatic approach, and for the two camps to come to some form of consensus.

"Ballot boxes are necessary to give legitimacy to a system, but they are not sufficient," columnist Naser Emani writes in the conservative Resalat. "To close the gap between the ruled and the rulers, both camps must find methods to unify values and beliefs shared by people and the government."

Both camps are becoming "prisoners of their own rhetoric, and neither dares to reinvent itself like the Kurdish leadership in Iraq and become a friend of America," says dissident journalist Kaveh Amiri.

Amiri, who was imprisoned for running an independent news website says the Iranian government has to find legitimacy first before dealing with the U.S. "No detenete or negotiations with America are possible without mutual trust between the ruled and the rulers," he says. "The rulers must first demonstrate that they are the true representatives of their people and only then speak for them."

An influential leader who has in the past supported an improvement of relations with the U.S. says the time is not right for negotiations. "President Bush is not listening to the presidents of Russia and France, and to the German Chancellor, why would he listen to President Mohammed Khattami," Saeed Laylaz from the pro-Khattami daily Hamshahri told IPS.

Laylaz, who had reported a consensus between conservative and reformist groups on improving relations with the U.S. earlier, now sees it falling apart. "Over the past four years developments in the domestic, regional and international arenas have made that dialogue irrelevant, at least for the time being," he says.

September 11 has made the U.S. an aggressive force in the region and Iran is now flanked by two countries that are U.S. protectorates - Iraq and Afghanistan - he says. "These regimes have reduced the bargaining power of Iran with the U.S. If we sit with U.S. officials at a negotiating table now, we will have to listen to what they say, and so that kind of move is untimely."

The reformists, who had earlier won landslide victories in presidential and parliamentary elections, failed to translate those victories into closer ties with the U.S. "We have missed many opportunities to improve our relations with the U.S. administration," says Elaheh Koulaee, campaigner for women's rights, and champion of détente with the U.S. in the parliamentary foreign relations commission.

The reformists, who have lost ground to their conservative rivals in elections to the Islamic rural and urban councils, have now switched to new tactics in encouraging students to speak up. They have tabled a proposal in parliament for setting up student unions and have asked for steps to encourage them to become politically active.

The bill would have to be approved by the majority and also endorsed by a 12-member panel of jurists of the Islamic constitution.

"The reformists are only trying to manipulate students to secure support for their vague agendas," says Amiri. "The trouble is that reformists themselves lack a vision about reforms." (END/2003)

Send your comments to the editor

 
 
 
 
RSS News Feeds RSS/XML
Make as home Make IPS News your homepage!
Free Newsletters Free Email Newsletters
IPS Mobile IPS Mobile
Text Only Text Only
International Seminar - Millennium Development Goal 3 and the role of the media
Related Topics
  Middle East and The Mediterranean
Obama: A New Era?
Financial Meltdown