Saturday, November 21, 2009   23:43 GMT    
IPS Direct to Your Inbox!
 - Africa
 - Asia-Pacific
     Afghanistan
     Iran
 - Caribbean
      Haiti
 - Europe
      Union in Diversity
 - Latin America
 - Mideast &
   Mediterranean
      Iraq
      Israel/Palestine
 - North America
      Neo-Cons
      Bush's Legacy
Agencia de Noticias Inter Press Service
Agencia de Noticias Inter Press Service
Subscribe
Agencia de Noticias Inter Press Service
Agencia de Noticias Inter Press Service
 - Development
      MDGs
      City Voices
      Corruption
 - Civil Society
 - Globalisation
 - Environment
      Energy Crunch
      Climate Change
      Tierramérica
 - Human Rights
 - Health
      HIV/AIDS
 - Indigenous Peoples
 - Economy & Trade
 - Labour
 - Population
     Reproductive Rights
     Migration&Refugees
 - Arts &
          Entertainment
 - Education
 - In Focus
Languages
   ENGLISH
   ESPAÑOL
   FRANÇAIS
   ARABIC
   DEUTSCH
   ITALIANO
   JAPANESE
   NEDERLANDS
   PORTUGUÊS
   SUOMI
   SVENSKA
   SWAHILI
   TÜRKÇE
IPS Inter Press Service News Agency
PrintSend to a friend
POLITICS-KENYA: Campaigners Seek Gov't Participation in WSF Meetings
By Joyce Mulama

NAIROBI, Jan 30 (IPS) - As dust begins to settle on the just concluded World Social Forum, some civil society activists are suggesting that governments should be allowed to participate in future meetings.

Without their engagement, the campaigners argue, it will be hard to implement recommendations drawn from the forum, whose policy marginalises governments.

"It is not enough to just go out there, shout, and then come back to continue with our lives. As civil society, we must begin to look at how we can engage governments because they are the ones with power to effect reforms," says Gertrude Kopiyo, Programme Director of Gender Sensitive Initiative, a Nairobi-based non-governmental organisation (NGO).

Kopiyo took part in the World Social Forum (WSF) held in the Indian coastal city of Mumbai from Jan. 16-21. About 100,000 campaigners from across the world, mostly developing nations, met in the city to protest against the effects of globalisation, unfair loaning policies from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank. They also protested against the unfriendly trading policies being advocated by the World Trade Organisation (WTO). Other topics discussed included HIV/AIDS, debt relief and gender.

"We tackled matters affecting women such as violence, and discrimination in areas such as education. Since the situation is similar in many countries, recommendations were drawn for implementation," Kopiyo says. "At country level, we need to translate them into action, and this cannot be done without government."

Concurring, Ababu Namwamba, of Chambers of Justice, an international rights organisation, says: "We need government to listen to us and be able to effect reforms arising from such forums."

Namwamba presented a paper in Mumbai on Africa's crippling 300-billion-dollar debt that, he argued, was as a result of high interests pegged on loans awarded to governments by donor institutions.

He says governments' presence in WSF would enable officials to listen more to campaigners.

But others disagree. "It is not a matter of having government at the negotiating table. The idea of the forum is to be able to distil its agenda of protesting against hostile western policies," Oduor Ong'wen, a key speaker in Mumbai on unfair trade between developed and least developed countries, told IPS.

"WSF is a protest forum against the World Economic Forum (WEF) that takes place in Davos, Switzerland, every year. It is the Third World governments that effect unfair policies originating from the west. And that is why this forum is opposed to government presence," he says.

WSF was formed to provide alternative thinking from WEF, a grouping of western political and economic "heavyweights" who determine the World Order.

According to Ong'wen, WSF holds the key to a better world free of suppression by the world's rich nations if it tackles policies that impact negatively on developing countries, mostly in Africa.

"Africa has never had space to make its own policies. It has been relying on policy packages designed by colonialists and the donor community. Sometimes we have good policies that favour us but are trampled upon by the west," he claims.

Ong'wen says continuous pressure by anti-globalisation campaigners will transform the world.

Namwamba agrees. "Never before has there been an organised movement to counter western forces that have for a long time taken advantage of the (African) continent," he says. "WSF provides an opportunity for civil society organisations to ventilate and express their opinions even if there is no one listening."

But critics warn that the WSF still does not have enough teeth. "This is still a young event that needs to gain root first. As of now, there is nothing much that can come from it, it may be just another talk show and an opportunity for people to globe trot," says Edward Otambo, a university student in Kenya's capital, Nairobi.

Mutahi Ngunyi, a renowned political scientist, says "WSF, a perfect tool, puts governments on their toes by checking their performances".

"WSF is absolutely necessary for purposes of producing shadow reports on government performance, and the only way to keep authorities in check is to have shadow reports by civil society," Ngunyi states.

The first, second and third WSF was held in 2001, 2002 and 2003 respectively, in Porto Alegre, Brazil. (END/2004)

Send your comments to the editor

 
 
 
 
RSS News Feeds RSS/XML
Make as home Make IPS News your homepage!
Free Newsletters Free Email Newsletters
IPS Mobile IPS Mobile
Text Only Text Only
International Seminar - Millennium Development Goal 3 and the role of the media
Related Topics
  Africa
  East Africa
Obama: A New Era?
Financial Meltdown