Wednesday, February 10, 2010   05:42 GMT    
IPS Direct to Your Inbox!
 - Africa
 - Asia-Pacific
     Afghanistan
     Iran
 - Caribbean
      Haiti
 - Europe
      Union in Diversity
 - Latin America
 - Mideast &
   Mediterranean
      Iraq
      Israel/Palestine
 - North America
      Neo-Cons
      Bush's Legacy
Agencia de Noticias Inter Press Service
Agencia de Noticias Inter Press Service
Subscribe
Agencia de Noticias Inter Press Service
Agencia de Noticias Inter Press Service
 - Development
      MDGs
      City Voices
      Corruption
 - Civil Society
 - Globalisation
 - Environment
      Energy Crunch
      Climate Change
      Tierramérica
 - Human Rights
 - Health
      HIV/AIDS
 - Indigenous Peoples
 - Economy & Trade
 - Labour
 - Population
     Reproductive Rights
     Migration&Refugees
 - Arts &
          Entertainment
 - Education
 - In Focus
Languages
   ENGLISH
   ESPAÑOL
   FRANÇAIS
   ARABIC
   DEUTSCH
   ITALIANO
   JAPANESE
   NEDERLANDS
   PORTUGUÊS
   SUOMI
   SVENSKA
   SWAHILI
IPS Inter Press Service News Agency
PrintSend to a friend
POLITICS-BURUNDI: The Long Road to Peace
By Joyce Mulama

NAIROBI, Oct 17, 2004 (IPS) - Motivated by the success in resolving Somalia’s conflict, African leaders have stepped up efforts to end the civil war in the tiny central African nation of Burundi where more than 300,000 people have been killed since 1993.

The leaders of Kenya, Uganda, Ethiopia, Somalia, Sudan, Eritrea and Djibouti, working under the auspices of the regional bloc, the Inter-governmental Authority on Development (IGAD) have brokered the talks to end Somalia’s 13-year civil war. The talks, which opened in neighbouring Kenya in 2002, culminated into the election of Abdullahi Yusuf Ahmed as president of Somalia on Oct. 10.

Yusuf is expected to form a government of national unity within a month. Somalia slid into chaos after the fall of the dictator Mohamed Siad Barre in 1991. Since then, the Horn of African country has been without a central government.

Following the experience of Somalia, African leaders don’t want Burundi to also slide into chaos. Attending the 23rd Summit of the Great Lakes Regional Peace Initiative on Burundi in Kenya’s capital Nairobi Oct. 15, the leaders of Kenya, Uganda, Rwanda, Tanzania and South Africa pushed Burundi’s elections forward to give more time to the country’s independent electoral commission, appointed at the end of Aug. 2004, to prepare and put in place modalities of running free and fair elections.

Initially, the elections had been scheduled for the end of Oct. 2004, when a three-year mandate of the country’s transitional government expires. Burundi’s government, led by President Domitien Ndayizeye, was installed in office in Oct. 2001.

The electoral commission, chaired by Paul Ngarambe, advised the summit of the impossibility of holding the elections on schedule because of logistical difficulties.

‘’Based on the reality on the ground, the summit accepts that elections cannot take place before November 1, 2004,’’ the African leaders, meeting in Nairobi, said in a joint statement made available to journalists. ‘’Furthermore, the summit noted that the life of the transition institutions and administration has to be extended.’’

Upon arrival in Burundi’s capital Bujumbura, president Ndayizeye announced that the elections would take place in Apr. 2005.

Some concerns have been raised about the postponement of the elections which, critics fear, might create more tensions between Hutus, who make up 85 percent of the country’s population, and Tutsis, who dominate the army. Clashes between the two ethnic groups have erupted intermittently since independence from Belgium in 1962.

But some political analysts have ruled out any tensions resulting from the postponement of the elections since the decision was not made by the Burundi government, but by a greater force comprising African leaders.

‘’The postponement (of the elections) has been made by a greater unit and the rebels would not want to fight the entire (regional) bloc which enjoys the support of the international community. There’s no need for the rebels to point a finger at the government,’’ Mitch Odero, of the Nairobi-based Solid Strategy Africa, a regional peace and advocacy group, told IPS.

The latest clashes between the Hutus and Tutus erupted in 1993 when renegade Tutsi soldiers assassinated Melchior Ndadaye, the first elected Hutu president.

Since then, the conflict has claimed more than 300,000 lives, the latest being the Aug. 2004 incident in which the National Liberation Forces (FNL), a Hutu rebel Movement, descended on a refugee camp in Burundi, slaughtering 160 Congolese Tutsis.

Hopes were raised in August when 20 parties, among them Tutsi and Hutu rebel groups except FNL, signed an accord, resulting into a power sharing agreement.

The deal, clinched in Tanzania, gives the Tutsi minority 40 percent of government and national assembly posts, compared to 60 percent for Hutus.

The activities of FNL, the only Hutu rebel group still mounting attacks in Burundi, have placed it in bad books with regional leaders. During the 22nd Summit of the Great Lakes Regional Peace initiative on Burundi, held Aug.18 in Tanzania’s commercial capital Dar es Salaam, Heads of State of Burundi, Tanzania, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Zambia and South Africa labeled the FNL a terrorist organisation.

They appealed to the United Nations Security Council to consider a travel ban on members of FNL, freeze the group’s assets and institute on it an arms embargo.

Critics fear that if the FNL was allowed to continue wreaking havoc, it might spark genocide, like in neighbouring Rwanda, where more than 800,000 Tutsis and politically moderate Hutus were slaughtered by Hutu extremists a decade ago. (END)

Send your comments to the editor

 
 
 
 
RSS News Feeds RSS/XML
Make as home Make IPS News your homepage!
Free Newsletters Free Email Newsletters
IPS Mobile IPS Mobile
Text Only Text Only
Related Topics
  Africa
  East Africa
  Southern Africa
  Central Africa
Obama: A New Era?
Financial Meltdown