Saturday, November 21, 2009   14:28 GMT    
IPS Direct to Your Inbox!
 - Africa
 - Asia-Pacific
     Afghanistan
     Iran
 - Caribbean
      Haiti
 - Europe
      Union in Diversity
 - Latin America
 - Mideast &
   Mediterranean
      Iraq
      Israel/Palestine
 - North America
      Neo-Cons
      Bush's Legacy
Agencia de Noticias Inter Press Service
Agencia de Noticias Inter Press Service
Subscribe
Agencia de Noticias Inter Press Service
Agencia de Noticias Inter Press Service
 - Development
      MDGs
      City Voices
      Corruption
 - Civil Society
 - Globalisation
 - Environment
      Energy Crunch
      Climate Change
      Tierramérica
 - Human Rights
 - Health
      HIV/AIDS
 - Indigenous Peoples
 - Economy & Trade
 - Labour
 - Population
     Reproductive Rights
     Migration&Refugees
 - Arts &
          Entertainment
 - Education
 - In Focus
Languages
   ENGLISH
   ESPAÑOL
   FRANÇAIS
   ARABIC
   DEUTSCH
   ITALIANO
   JAPANESE
   NEDERLANDS
   PORTUGUÊS
   SUOMI
   SVENSKA
   SWAHILI
   TÜRKÇE
IPS Inter Press Service News Agency
PrintSend to a friend
ENVIRONMENT-SOUTH AFRICA: Is "Cull" a Four-Letter Word?
By Moyiga Nduru

JOHANNESBURG, Dec 5 (IPS) - Lawrence Anthony is known for rescuing animals, including lions, from former Iraqi ruler Saddam Hussein's palaces after Baghdad fell to U.S. forces in April 2003.

"The animals were starving and we removed them from various palaces and took them to the main zoo in Baghdad," he told IPS.

Now the South African animal lover has, along with scientists and other activists, embarked on another mission: stopping the proposed cull of more than 5,000 elephant in South Africa's world-renowned Kruger National Park, located in the north-east of the country. The proposal was put forward by the board of South African National Parks (SANParks), the government body which manages the country's network of protected areas.

"We believe that more scientific research is needed before any decision is taken. There is not enough research on how many animals the Kruger Park can carry," said Anthony.

In addition, noted Ian Raper of the Pretoria-based South African Association for the Advancement of Science, there are other options on the table for controlling the elephant population in Kruger - notably contraception.

"We get protein from pigs and dart the animals, and it prevents them from conceiving," he told IPS. "It has been used since the 1970s on numerous animals like horses and seals in the sea, and it has been tested in the Kruger Park."

In fact, this contraceptive technology appears so effective, that it has attracted the attention of other countries.

"Kenya has approached South Africa to vaccinate 700 elephants.We are exporting our technology, but we are not using it ourselves," said Anthony.

The contraceptive vaccination, which is administered by someone flying above the elephant herd in a helicopter, also has the virtue of being long-lasting.

"One dart can last for two years," said Raper, and: "We are very close to having it last for five years.The vaccine has minimal side effects, with only a lump on the elephant where it has been darted."

Christina Pretorius of the International Fund for Animal Welfare, a non-governmental organisation, is similarly upbeat about elephant contraception.

"The vaccine has been proven to work in a number of small game parks. For example, in Makaladi Game Park they use the contraceptive and find it very successful. It's an option that we need to explore further," she said in an interview with IPS. Makaladi Game Park is situated in South Africa's North West Province, on the border with Botswana and Namibia.

Both Anthony and Raper feel that South African conservation authorities may not be sufficiently informed about the latest advances in elephant contraception, to make an informed decision about whether to use this technology.

"People don't know that contraception has improved. It's not hormonal anymore.There should be no fear of the vaccine at all," said Raper. "Culling is a terrible prospect. The animals will be traumatised and become aggressive."

However, Gehard Verdoorn, a leading South African conservationist based in the financial capital of Johannesburg, says there's more to the story than ignorance.

"I do not believe that contraception is economically and ecologically a viable option, as the only option. It may be used as a small contributor to solving the problem," he told IPS.

"What is also important about contraception is that there is as yet no drug that is formally approved and accepted," Verdoorn added. "The work that was done so far on contraception was research, and there needs to be more research before this can even be submitted.for approval."

As a result, he noted, all options for managing the elephant population in Kruger needed to be taken into account to combat elephant overpopulation. The number of elephant in the park has increased from 7,500 in 1994 to 12,500 at present, according to official statistics.

"I don't think anybody likes the idea of culling elephants. But, it is a definite option to contribute to the management of overpopulation - as long as it's done with the most humane and ethical methods available to the Kruger National Park," said Verdoorn.

This view is echoed by conservation authorities.

"In all South African national parks with elephants, the populations are increasing at near maximal rates and currently show no signs of being limited.Populations cannot continue to grow indefinitely," said David Mabunda, chief executive of SANParks, in a report issued Sep. 8.

South Africa suspended culling in Kruger in 1995, mostly as a result of local and international pressure. In the preceding three decades, some 16,000 elephants had been culled in South Africa, according to Pretorius.

Anthony maintains that any resumption of culling would have swift and severe repercussions globally.

"TV images showing elephants killed will spark international outrage," he noted. "The era of the internet will make matters worse."

The Washington-based Humane Society of the United States, Anthony added, had warned that it would advise its 8.5 million members to avoid South Africa as a tourist destination if the cull took place.

For her part, Pretorius believes widespread opposition to the proposed cull may yet sway South African officials.

"I don't think that the government will be able to push this through without expecting a lot of protests from scientists and animal rights groups," she noted.

"We are cautiously hoping to win the war." (END/2005)

Send your comments to the editor

 
 
 
 
RSS News Feeds RSS/XML
Make as home Make IPS News your homepage!
Free Newsletters Free Email Newsletters
IPS Mobile IPS Mobile
Text Only Text Only
International Seminar - Millennium Development Goal 3 and the role of the media
Related Topics
  Africa
  Environment
  East Africa
  Southern Africa
  Africa in the Spotlight
  Reporters on the Frontline of Environment
Obama: A New Era?
Financial Meltdown