Sunday, November 22, 2009   06:11 GMT    
IPS Direct to Your Inbox!
 - Africa
 - Asia-Pacific
     Afghanistan
     Iran
 - Caribbean
      Haiti
 - Europe
      Union in Diversity
 - Latin America
 - Mideast &
   Mediterranean
      Iraq
      Israel/Palestine
 - North America
      Neo-Cons
      Bush's Legacy
Agencia de Noticias Inter Press Service
Agencia de Noticias Inter Press Service
Subscribe
Agencia de Noticias Inter Press Service
Agencia de Noticias Inter Press Service
 - Development
      MDGs
      City Voices
      Corruption
 - Civil Society
 - Globalisation
 - Environment
      Energy Crunch
      Climate Change
      Tierramérica
 - Human Rights
 - Health
      HIV/AIDS
 - Indigenous Peoples
 - Economy & Trade
 - Labour
 - Population
     Reproductive Rights
     Migration&Refugees
 - Arts &
          Entertainment
 - Education
 - In Focus
Languages
   ENGLISH
   ESPAÑOL
   FRANÇAIS
   ARABIC
   DEUTSCH
   ITALIANO
   JAPANESE
   NEDERLANDS
   PORTUGUÊS
   SUOMI
   SVENSKA
   SWAHILI
   TÜRKÇE
IPS Inter Press Service News Agency
PrintSend to a friend
TRADE: China In Violation of WTO Protocols
By Eli Clifton

WASHINGTON, Aug 13 (IPS) - Since 2001 China has become an increasingly active member of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) and proponent of open and competitive markets, but yesterday the WTO released a report saying that China has violated WTO protocols by restricting imports of DVDs, software and books and limiting the ability of foreign suppliers to distribute their own products in China.

The fact that the WTO has substantiated the accusations about China’s discriminatory trade practices highlights the double-edged sword which WTO membership has become for one of the world’s largest and fastest growing economies.

China faces the challenge of maintaining and increasing access to markets around the world in order to maintain its massive manufacturing based economy, but protectionism of its own domestic industries has - in the past - been a crucial component of China’s growth.

The WTO report - which is the culmination of a U.S.-led 2007 dispute claim - concludes that China violated WTO agreements by censoring or restricting the import of reading materials, films and music.

Chinese import barriers took the form of censorship or requiring manufacturers and distributors of copyrighted material to distribute through Chinese companies.

The 469-page report found that China’s policies were "discriminatory" in that they put foreign firms at an unfair disadvantage for importing copyrighted materials.

"Today, a WTO panel handed a significant victory to America’s creative industries," said U.S. Trade Representative, Ambassador Ron Kirk. "These findings are an important step toward ensuring market access for legitimate U.S. products in the Chinese market, as well as ensuring market access for U.S. exporters and distributors of those products. We will work tirelessly so that American companies and workers can fully realise the market opening benefits that this decision signals."

Industry groups most affected by the ruling include: The Motion Picture Association of America, the Recording Industry Association of America and the Association of American Publishers.

While the report did find a number of the complaints filed by the U.S. were legitimate, it did find some complaints lacked merit - specifically complaints claiming China’s laws covering piracy are inadequate. Both China and the U.S. might appeal the report’s findings.

The lack of an explicit condemnation of China’s enforcement of intellectual property laws - particularly with regards to pirated music, movies and software - is a setback for industries which have long sought to force China to more strictly enforce its existing copyright and intellectual property laws.

Beijing has not had a strong response to the report, but a statement released on China’s Ministry of Commerce website said that China was disappointed that the WTO had not rejected the U.S. complaint about the imports and distribution of foreign copyrighted materials.

"China has always fulfilled its obligations on market access for publications, and the channels for foreign publications, films and audio-visual products to enter the Chinese market are extremely open," said Yao Jian, spokesperson for the Chinese Ministry of Commerce, according to Xinhua News Agency.

China’s membership in the WTO was seen as requiring considerable concessions from Chinese policymakers and younger, economic reformers had to fight hard to convince older leadership that opening the Chinese economy - in line with WTO rules - wouldn’t destroy domestic industries.

"The leadership was wiling to join the WTO on these terms since it had to deliver on economic growth and prosperity," said Chair of Asian Studies and Professor of Applied Economics at Bates College Margaret Maurer-Fazio. "The WTO could serve as a foil for unpopular policies. It gives the leadership some distance from difficult decisions that will hurt some people but have good long term benefits."

China has increasingly used the WTO’s mechanisms to file its own complaints against WTO members who it feels are discriminating against Chinese imports.

On Jul. 31 China announced that it was filing a complaint with the WTO against the European Union (EU) for anti-dumping measures it had taken against Chinese iron and steel fasteners.

The EU will have 60 days to resolve the dispute through consultations, but if a resolution is not reached China can ask for a WTO panel to investigate the complaints and rule on whether the EU violated WTO rules.

(END/2009)

Send your comments to the editor

 
 
 
 
RSS News Feeds RSS/XML
Make as home Make IPS News your homepage!
Free Newsletters Free Email Newsletters
IPS Mobile IPS Mobile
Text Only Text Only
International Seminar - Millennium Development Goal 3 and the role of the media
Related IPS Articles
 ECONOMY: China Warns Against Protectionism
 CHINA/US: Wealth of Nations Redefined
 CHINA: Headed for Trade Wars With US
Related Topics
  North America
  Asia-Pacific
  Money Matters: Economy, Trade and Finance
  Trade Wars
  Obama: A New Era?
  POWER GAMES: IPSs Coverage of Global Geopolitics
  Financial Meltdown
Obama: A New Era?
Financial Meltdown