|
|
RIGHTS: State of India’s Children: An Unsettling Reality Analysis by Neeta Lal NEW DELHI, Nov 13 (IPS) - Here is a sobering thought on the eve of Children’s Day celebrated across India
on Nov. 14. Despite the country’s impressive economic growth trajectory and
growing geopolitical heft, the benefits of that prosperity are not percolating
down to its children who constitute a sizeable 30 percent of the country’s 1.2
billion population.
Hence, 6,000 children die in India every day—a shocking 3,000 due to
malnutrition—which Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh recently described as
a
"national shame". India also hosts a third of the world’s child brides,
according
to the United Nations Children’s Fund report, released in October, ‘Progress
for Children: A Report Card on Child Protection'.
Worse, India’s infant mortality rate—an abysmal 53 per 1,000 births—trails
far behind its Millennium Development Goal (MDG) target of 30. MDGs are
eight international development goals to be achieved by 2015.
In addition, 53 percent of Indian kids face sexual abuse. Of the 13 percent of
all children engaged in labor in south Asia, India hosts more than half while
33 percent of Indian children consume alcohol and narcotics each day and
half a million get hooked to these potentially dangerous substances every
year.
"The pathetic state of children’s health in India is reflective of a total failure
of
its democracy, public institutions and civil society," opines Praveen Nair,
chairperson of Salaam Balak Trust, a pan-India non-governmental
organisation for underprivileged children. Nair tells IPS that enforcing
children's rights is a prerequisite to creating an environment where children
can be nurtured to realise their optimal potential.
On the contrary in the world’s largest democracy, there is not enough
empathy for children once described by the government as a "supremely
important asset".
The World Bank estimates that India is ranked second, with 47 percent after
Bangladesh, among countries with the most malnourished children. In fact,
the prevalence of underweight children in India is among the highest in the
world, nearly double that of Sub-Saharan Africa.
These are discomfiting realities for a country that traditionally celebrates
Children’s Day on Nov. 14 with a plethora of activities, nay, tokenisms,
ranging from politicians lecturing on how children are India’s future,
government launching new schemes and puppet shows/child plays in schools
for the poor.
The U.N. estimates that 2.1 million Indian children die before reaching the
age of five every year—four every minute—mostly from preventable illnesses
such as diarrhea, typhoid, malaria, measles and pneumonia.
This is despite the existence of a raft of child-centric schemes that
emphasise holistic and inclusive growth. The Integrated Child Development
Scheme (ICDS)—launched in 1975—for instance, seeks to provide an
integrated package of services for the holistic development of children. The
ICDS program reaches out to more than 34 million children aged zero to six
years, and seven million pregnant and lactating mothers.
The government’s mid-day meal scheme—another government programme
which seeks to achieve the twin goals of luring marginalised children to
schools while providing nutrition for their growth—has not borne the desired
fruit, with both the quantity and quality of food being below par.
According to Umesh Singh, program officer for child Rights at the New Delhi-
based Bal Panchayat, a government organisation for child welfare, "a single
child is offered 200 to 300 grams of food per meal, which is insufficient.
Eggs, which were once a part of the menu, have also been struck off the list.
What kind of nutrition can simple ‘khichdi’ (rice gruel) provide for a growing
kid?"
Ashok Sharma, project director of the Community Aid and Sponsorship
Program (CASP), which undertakes community-based projects, tells IPS that
while there is no undermining the fact that the Indian government means well
and has launched several schemes to benefit children, an opaque bureaucracy
and corruption are gnawing into them.
"We need to become more transparent as a society first for such measures to
succeed," says Singh.
The government’s push to get all children between the ages of six and 14
into school seems to be having mixed results as well. While the overall
enrolment rate has ratcheted up, girls and the underprivileged are not getting
their fair share of the benefits.
The numbers indicate that the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA) program—the
government’s flagship universal education scheme launched in 2001-02—
may be achieving its mandate, with as many as 96.5 percent of the children
in the target group nationwide attending school, according to a survey
conducted by the human resource development ministry last year.
Enrolment under SSA increased from 131 million in 2001-02 to 182 million
in 2004-05. Out-of-school children plummeted from 32 million in 2001-02
to 7.1 million in 2005-06, a 78 percent downward spiral. But the programme
has not had as beneficial an effect among sections of society that need it the
most, according to data from 10 states and one union territory.
The selective data showed that the enrolment of girls had risen by just 0.62
percentage point—and was still less than half—from 46.43 percent in 2003
to 47.05 percent in 2007. Among scheduled castes and scheduled tribes—
India’s marginalised sectors—enrolment had actually fallen from 32.9 percent
to 31.84 percent.
"Motivation is key to pushing poor children to make use of the system," says
Nair. Yet "in many schools, teacher absenteeism is common and they set the
bar very low for these children. This kills all incentives to thrive in a
competitive peer environment."
Another widespread malaise in India is that of child labor. Article 24 of the
Indian constitution clearly states, "No child below the age of 14 years shall be
employed to work in any factory or mine or employed in any hazardous
employment".
The Child Labor Act in 1986, too, "prohibits the employment of children who
have not completed their 14th year in specified hazardous occupations and
processes". But across large swaths of the country are tiny hands working in
fiery factories—fireworks, glass making, carpet making, fashion produce, to
name some.
In fact, an alarming upswing in the number of child labourers forced the
Indian government to introduce the ‘Bandhua Mazdoor (‘Bonded Labor’) Roko’
Act in 1976. The law contains punitive provisions against parents who send
or sell their children to do labour.
But often there is little the government can do about parents clandestinely
packing off their children to work to take care of their own financial debts.
Faced with the inability of earlier legislation to prevent child labour, the
government finally implemented the ‘Bal Mazdoori Roko’ (‘Stop Child labor’)
Act to preempt use of child labour in 25 dangerous industries.
However, poor implementation of comprehensive laws neuters their effect.
Recounts a glass bangle maker, who declined to be named, in Ferozabad,
Uttar Pradesh—famous for bangles and glass works—who employs kids: "The
police regularly raid our workshops to pick up child laborers. But no sooner
do the cops turn their backs than the parents come begging us to take their
children back!"
According to CASP’s Sharma, in India everything boils down to the age-old
twin evils of a gargantuan population and illiteracy. "This makes the poor
vulnerable to unscrupulous elements," he says. "They are exploited by corrupt
contractors due to lack of awareness and education."
Singh contends that governmental welfare schemes often encounter limited
success as they overlook practical aspects. He says, for instance, that
according to government rules, it is mandatory for parents to submit the
child’s birth certificate at the time of school admission.
"This creates pressure on the poor parents to buy these certificates from
touts who charge a premium. If a daily wager queues up to buy a certificate,
he will end up missing a day’s—or several days’—salary. Obviously, it won’t
be an attractive proposition for him," he says.
As it is, Singh stresses, education is simply not a priority for parents
struggling to keep the wolf from their door. "Poor parents prefer that the
child go out and earn even if they have to beg, so that they can contribute to
the family kitty. School isn’t glamorous enough in these circumstances."
In such a complex scenario, unless the private players and voluntary outfits
accelerate their efforts, and all stakeholders are motivated to do their best, it
will be no child’s play to put a smile on the faces of all Indian kids.
(END/2009)
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|