POLITICS: Blueprint Emerges for Future Peace Talkss
By Marwaan Macan-Markar
NAKHON PATHOM, Thailand, Jan 10 (IPS) - In the agreements
reached during the just-concluded round of Sri Lankan peace
talks here, the negotiators laid out the route they wish to
use to cross the political minefields that lie ahead.
For starters, they prefer to avoid seeking an immediate remedy
for explosive issues, particularly those that could destroy
the still fledgling peace process between Colombo and the
Tamil Tiger rebels.
But this does not mean shying away from politically sensitive
matters. Rather, the two sides appear to be willing to soldier
on by seeking solutions that will, in the end, satisfy the
warring parties.
This was how the negotiators overcame the first major obstacle
at the just concluded talks -- a sharp difference of views
between a Sri Lankan military commander and the Tamil Tigers
over the resettlement of Tamil civilians in lands under military
occupation in Sri Lanka's north.
It arose after the military commander suggested that the
Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), as the rebels are
known, should disarm and decommission its heavy weapons in
the north before Tamil civilians are permitted back to their
homes.
During this fourth round of talks, which ran from Jan. 6-10,
the LTTE pulled out of a special committee set up in the war-ravaged
island's north to discuss the sensitive issues such as de-escalation
and normalisation.
It marked the first major setback to the negotiations since
the LTTE and Colombo began their peace talks at a Thai naval
base in September last year. The rebels declared that this
committee was redundant, since among its members was the military
commander who wanted resettlement tied to the Tigers giving
up their weapons.
Nevertheless, this act of protest did not result in the
collapse of the talks.
On the contrary, the LTTE agreed to Colombo's proposal to
speed up resettlement in areas beyond the disputed territory
and, further, to seek the views of an Indian military expert
on striking a balance between humanitarian and security needs.
After this compromise was reached, Anton Balasingham, the
LTTE's chief negotiator, said: ''The peace talks are going
on very well. There is no crisis.''
A similar pattern emerges in the way the negotiators tiptoed
around another sensitive subject - the political concerns
of Sri Lanka's Muslim minority - during the talks at a resort
here some 32 kilometres west of Bangkok.
The LTTE has maintained that the negotiations had no room
for direct talks between the rebels and a Muslim delegation.
The government, though, has included a Muslim member on its
delegation. The Muslims are Sri Lanka's second largest minority,
making up seven percent of the country's 19.6 million people.
The Tamils make up 18 percent of the population and the majority
Sinhalese, 74 percent.
The Tigers' resistance to talking to the Muslims did not
prevent the fourth round of talks from ending with a statement
where Muslim issues received mention for the first time. ''The
particular needs of the displaced Muslim population will be
duly accommodated in the resettlement process,'' the statement
said.
It added later on that the current negotiators, who are
perceived as representing the Sri Lankan government -- hence
the country's Sinhalese majority -- and the Tamil minority,
have agreed to invite a Muslim delegation in the future to
discuss pressing political issues.
The LTTE's reluctance to permit a Muslim delegation at the
talks stems from a tense relationship between the rebels and
the Muslim community in Sri Lanka's north and eastern province,
the region where the LTTE has been waging a war to carve out
the separate state of Tamil Eelam.
Currently, there are over 70,000 Muslims from Sri Lanka's
north seeking to be resettled in their homes after they were
driven out at gunpoint by the LTTE in 1990.
Over 64,000 people have been killed during this almost two-decade
long conflict.
This approach to negotiations - not evading the sensitive
issues completely, but finding a way around them or expressing
willingness to take them up in the future - was not lost on
officials from Norway, who are facilitating this peace process.
In particular, the government and Tiger rebels agreed to
stay on course with the talks despite the troubling issues
remaining unresolved.
''It (the fourth round of talks) has been a historic meeting,''
said Vidar Helgesen, Norway's deputy foreign minister. ''History
is in the making, and that requires hard work, and the parties
have displayed a lot of hard work in a constructive manner
in this meeting.''
''Both parties recognised that there are issues that have
to be addressed in earnest,'' said Gamini Lakshman Peiris,
Colombo's chief negotiator. This attitude will be tested in
the forthcoming rounds of talks, now that Colombo and the
LTTE have agreed to take up human rights concerns during the
peace process.
The development agenda for the war-ravaged north and east,
ranging from infrastructure needs such as rebuilding roads
to rebuilding hospitals and schools, is also another political
minefield the negotiators will have to face.
Yet, if the language emerging from this pivotal round of
talks is an indicator, both warring parties appear willing
to stay engaged and talk, and not shy away from difficult
issues.
It is a view reflected in a plea made in the final statement
from the latest talks. The negotiators wanted the Norwegians
to create a mechanism to ''ensure rapid corrective action
by the parties in case of incidents that are or can be perceived
as disrupting the peace process''. (END/IPS/AP/IP/HD/MMM/JS/03)
|