Search           Contacts          Headlines

news in

      Homepage
      Global affairs
      Africa
      Asia-Pacific
      Caribbean
      Europe
      Latin America
      Middle East
      North America
 
      Environment
      Development
      Human Rights
      Population
      Health
      Arts &
      Entertainment

      Columns
 
      News in RSS
 
      Subscriptions
      Readers' Opinions
      About IPS

 

 

RIGHTS: U.S. Rules Out Powell's Attendance at World Racism Meet

By Jim Lobe

Back to index

WASHINGTON, Aug 28 (IPS) - In another sign of the growing estrangement between the United States and most of the rest of the world, the State Department has confirmed that Secretary of State Colin Powell will not attend the World Conference Against Racism and warned that Washington may not participate at all.

''It is clear to us now that the secretary will not go to this conference,'' said Department spokesman Richard Boucher. ''The exact nature and level of our representation, if any, is not clear.''

He added that Washington had always said it would boycott the conference, which begins Friday in Durban and runs through Sep. 7, if the draft declaration contained ''offensive'' language about Israel or attempted to revive a U.N. General Assembly resolution - dating from the 1970s - that equated Zionism with racism.

But Boucher's rationale was blasted by Michael McClintock, a senior policy analyst at New York-based Human Rights Watch as a ''pretext'' used by the administration of President George W. Bush to withdraw from a meeting in which it never had any interest.

''It sounds like this was a pretext for withdrawing,'' McClintock told IPS. In fact, the words 'Zionism' and 'Israel' had pretty much disappeared from the draft text in negotiations that have taken place in recent days, although an indirect reference to Israel's ''occupied territories'' remains a point of continuing contention.

''This fits the larger trend of the administration's foreign policy, which everyone is calling unilateralism and the State Department says is 'a la carte multilateralism','' according to McClintock.

Indeed, paragraphs of greatest concern to the United States - dealing with Israel and reparations for slavery - had been watered down considerably over the last several weeks in hopes of persuading Washington to send a delegation headed by Powell, the first African-American to head the U.S. armed forces and the foreign service. He is said to have had a personal interest in attending the conference.

Washington's decision to downgrade its representation and possibly participate only as observers at the World Conference Against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance (WCAR), as it is formally called, marks the latest in a series of decisions which have isolated the Bush administration from the larger international community, including some of the closest U.S. allies.

Since taking office last January, Bush has suspended high-level talks with North Korea on missile proliferation, withdrawn from negotiations on the Kyoto Protocol to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, vowed to withdraw from the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) if Russia declines to renegotiate its terms, announced its opposition to a treaty banning chemical and biological weapons, worked to water down a proposed framework convention restricting tobacco advertising and marketing, and may now be considering ways to torpedo the Rome Treaty to create an international criminal court.

The decision against sending Powell was telegraphed by Bush himself last Friday, when he was asked about U.S. attendance in Durban during a press conference.

Washington would boycott the Durban conference, he said, if delegates are permitted to ''pick on Israel. If they use the forum as a way to isolate our friend and strong ally, we will not participate,'' he warned.

But he also indicated Washington opposed any serious discussion of reparations for slavery, a stand that outraged many civil rights groups for whom the issue has become a fast-rising priority over the last several years as Washington and other governments have taken remedial action for past human rights abuses, such as slave labour used by Nazi Germany and the U.S. internment of Japanese-American citizens during World War II.

''The U.S. in particular should have participated at the highest level and should have provided generous financial support for the conference because it was historically the greatest beneficiary of slavery,'' argued Salih Booker, director of Africa Action, a Washington-based lobby group. ''The U.S., after all, is the world's richest country as a result.''

Booker called the administration's threats to boycott WCAR ''the height of arrogance,'' as well as a ''callous dismissal of one of the greatest problems facing the U.S. and the world today.''

Not everyone was disappointed by the decision. The Republican leadership in the House of Representatives, which last month scotched hearings on the U.S. position on WCAR, praised the move, as did pro-Israel groups which lobbied hard against Powell's attendance.

''We believe the intransigence of those nations determined to hijack this conference to promote their self-serving, anti-Israel agenda left the United States with no alternative,'' said Abraham Foxman, director of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), a major Jewish group. ''Secretary Powell's presence in Durban would only confer legitimacy on the anti-Semitic rhetoric that threatens to derail an otherwise laudable effort to fight global racism.''

Still, Washington may still pay a serious price for downgrading its participation or sending only an observer delegation, according to some analysts. ''It's going to really hurt Bush's relations with the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) and any effort to cultivate African Americans,'' noted one Capitol Hill aide. She added that the conference had offered a great platform for Powell to speak to blacks back home in Bush's name.

According to McClintock, Monday's decision will also add to the growing impression abroad that Bush is determined to act unilaterally, even on symbolic issues of no practical consequence to the United States.

He said the decision also ''undermines the administration's credibility'' on international human rights, particularly in light of the ''hue and cry'' it raised after losing its seat on the UN Human Rights Commission last spring. ''They have a seat in Durban, but it seems they're not going to sit in it,'' he said. (END/IPS/NA/HD/JL/AA/01)