<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Inter Press ServiceCINEMA-USA: The United States - &#039;The Big One&#039;</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.ipsnews.net/1998/05/cinema-usa-the-united-states-the-big-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.ipsnews.net/1998/05/cinema-usa-the-united-states-the-big-one/</link>
	<description>News and Views from the Global South</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 17:12:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>CINEMA-USA: The United States &#8211; &#8216;The Big One&#8217;</title>
		<link>https://www.ipsnews.net/1998/05/cinema-usa-the-united-states-the-big-one/</link>
		<comments>https://www.ipsnews.net/1998/05/cinema-usa-the-united-states-the-big-one/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 1998 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Farhan Haq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Headlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arts and Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipsnews.net/?p=88277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why call it the United States of America when you could use a more evocative name &#8211; like &#8220;The Big One&#8221;? Why should patriotic Americans stand for the the &#8220;Star-Spangled Banner&#8221; when the national anthem could be that catchy little number by Queen &#8211; &#8220;We Will Rock You&#8221;? &#8216; These are just some of the [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Farhan Haq<br />NEW YORK, May 5 1998 (IPS) </p><p>Why call it the United States of America when you could use a more evocative name &#8211; like &#8220;The Big One&#8221;? Why should patriotic Americans stand for the the &#8220;Star-Spangled Banner&#8221; when the national anthem could be that catchy little number by Queen &#8211; &#8220;We Will Rock You&#8221;? &#8216; These are just some of the questions asked by writer-director- author Michael Moore in a scrappy, affably populist way in his new quasi-documentary movie &#8211; called &#8220;The Big One&#8221; (distributed by Miramax).<br />
<span id="more-88277"></span><br />
Moore, famous for his mocking view of then General Motors Chief Executive Officer Roger Smith in the documentary &#8216;Roger and Me&#8217;, offers the same biting, yet affectionate, view of the modern-day United States. His new film is partly a series of comedy sketches, and partly a peek at U.S. class conflict.</p>
<p>It also, somewhat annoyingly, is a belated advertisement for Moore&#8217;s 1996 Random House-published book &#8216;Downsize This!&#8217; The documentary was shot during Moore&#8217;s book tour across the United States, and therefore it combines a deft tour of Middle America &#8211; places like Chicago, Des Moines and Moore&#8217;s hometown of Flint, Michigan &#8211; with seemingly endless shots of the author signing his book.</p>
<p>The movie similarly is both a sometimes scabrous depiction of a United States which is increasingly divided between profit-hungry corporations and workers worried about losing their jobs, and a fawning look at the pudgy, gregarious Moore himself. At times, it becomes difficult to determine whether the United States or Moore is the &#8220;big one&#8221; of the film.</p>
<p>Since &#8216;Roger and Me&#8217; came out in 1989, Moore has been berated as much by the left for his populist style as he has by the right for his gibes about everything from Nike&#8217;s treatment of Indonesian workers to the hefty amounts of money involved in political campaigns.</p>
<p>Conservatives may hate Moore&#8217;s worldview, but leftist writers like Alexander Cockburn have accused him of hypocrisy, idealising the amiable clutter of the blue-collar American heartland while himself becoming a wealthy New Yorker. Moore in fact has some fun in &#8216;The Big One&#8217; at his own expense, showing himself chortling about flying first-class on an airplane and telling an interviewer that he is having second thoughts about the tax system now that he is best-selling author.<br />
<br />
In many other ways, &#8216;The Big One&#8217; is Moore&#8217;s best defense. He shows genuine fondness for the working-class Americans he meets on his book tour &#8211; bookstore workers meeting secretly in parking lots to plan forming a union, welfare recipients who come to Wisconsin&#8217;s state house equipped to clean the building if officials can&#8217;t find them work, and local heroes like Chicago&#8217;s legendary radio host Studs Terkel.</p>
<p>Also, Moore&#8217;s skeptical worldview is genuinely amusing, and in the film&#8217;s (and the book&#8217;s) best bits, he succeeds at pulling pranks that reveal a lot about the corrupted way &#8216;The Big One&#8217; works. One successful prank that upset the White House is shown early on, when Moore writes cheques from such self-created groups as &#8216;Hemp Growers for Bill Clinton&#8217; and &#8216;Abortionists for Pat Buchanan&#8217; which were promptly cashed by the politicians &#8211; despite their professed abhorrence for the causes involved.</p>
<p>In another scene, he offers to issue a cheque worth 65 cents to one company which has just closed down a U.S.-based factory, so that it can afford to pay one hour of wages for the first Mexican worker it hires in its new location.</p>
<p>Behind the jokes &#8211; some of which work, and some of which simply fall flat &#8211; is a look at a working-class America that is more anxious about job loss, more alienated from government and more depressed about the future. Corporate executives &#8211; several of whom are seen shutting Moore out of their offices or responding to his questions with stilted bromides about staying &#8220;competitive&#8221; in a globalised world &#8211; seem part of an entirely different world.</p>
<p>In the movie&#8217;s high point, Nike Chief Executive Officer Phil Knight explains that his shoe firm doesn&#8217;t own U.S. factories because Americans &#8220;don&#8217;t really want to make shoes.&#8221;</p>
<p>When confronted with a video of Michigan workers asserting that they would gladly work for Nike jobs, Knight cynically counters that workers may say that, but don&#8217;t actually want to face the same task of making shoes that foreign workers perform &#8211; an implicit admission that they simply don&#8217;t want to work for wages below the U.S. minimum and poor conditions.</p>
<p>Knight, by the way, shows similar tactlessness when Moore asks him whether he would feel bad about 14-year-olds working to make Nike shoes, as happens in Indonesia. &#8220;No,&#8221; the cheerful Nike boss responds.</p>
<p>At such times, &#8216;The Big One&#8217; &#8211; the film and the nation &#8211; can be darkly amusing, but not really funny at all.</p>
		]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ipsnews.net/1998/05/cinema-usa-the-united-states-the-big-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CINEMA-USA: The United States &#8211; &#8216;The Big One&#8217;</title>
		<link>https://www.ipsnews.net/1998/05/cinema-usa-the-united-states-the-big-one/</link>
		<comments>https://www.ipsnews.net/1998/05/cinema-usa-the-united-states-the-big-one/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 1998 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Farhan Haq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Headlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arts and Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipsnews.net/?p=88278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why call it the United States of America when you could use a more evocative name &#8211; like &#8220;The Big One&#8221;? Why should patriotic Americans stand for the the &#8220;Star-Spangled Banner&#8221; when the national anthem could be that catchy little number by Queen &#8211; &#8220;We Will Rock You&#8221;? &#8216; These are just some of the [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Farhan Haq<br />NEW YORK, May 4 1998 (IPS) </p><p>Why call it the United States of America when you could use a more evocative name &#8211; like &#8220;The Big One&#8221;? Why should patriotic Americans stand for the the &#8220;Star-Spangled Banner&#8221; when the national anthem could be that catchy little number by Queen &#8211; &#8220;We Will Rock You&#8221;? &#8216; These are just some of the questions asked by writer-director- author Michael Moore in a scrappy, affably populist way in his new quasi-documentary movie &#8211; called &#8220;The Big One&#8221; (distributed by Miramax).<br />
<span id="more-88278"></span><br />
Moore, famous for his mocking view of then General Motors Chief Executive Officer Roger Smith in the documentary &#8216;Roger and Me&#8217;, offers the same biting, yet affectionate, view of the modern-day United States. His new film is partly a series of comedy sketches, and partly a peek at U.S. class conflict.</p>
<p>It also, somewhat annoyingly, is a belated advertisement for Moore&#8217;s 1996 Random House-published book &#8216;Downsize This!&#8217; The documentary was shot during Moore&#8217;s book tour across the United States, and therefore it combines a deft tour of Middle America &#8211; places like Chicago, Des Moines and Moore&#8217;s hometown of Flint, Michigan &#8211; with seemingly endless shots of the author signing his book.</p>
<p>The movie similarly is both a sometimes scabrous depiction of a United States which is increasingly divided between profit-hungry corporations and workers worried about losing their jobs, and a fawning look at the pudgy, gregarious Moore himself. At times, it becomes difficult to determine whether the United States or Moore is the &#8220;big one&#8221; of the film.</p>
<p>Since &#8216;Roger and Me&#8217; came out in 1989, Moore has been berated as much by the left for his populist style as he has by the right for his gibes about everything from Nike&#8217;s treatment of Indonesian workers to the hefty amounts of money involved in political campaigns.</p>
<p>Conservatives may hate Moore&#8217;s worldview, but leftist writers like Alexander Cockburn have accused him of hypocrisy, idealising the amiable clutter of the blue-collar American heartland while himself becoming a wealthy New Yorker. Moore in fact has some fun in &#8216;The Big One&#8217; at his own expense, showing himself chortling about flying first-class on an airplane and telling an interviewer that he is having second thoughts about the tax system now that he is best-selling author.<br />
<br />
In many other ways, &#8216;The Big One&#8217; is Moore&#8217;s best defense. He shows genuine fondness for the working-class Americans he meets on his book tour &#8211; bookstore workers meeting secretly in parking lots to plan forming a union, welfare recipients who come to Wisconsin&#8217;s state house equipped to clean the building if officials can&#8217;t find them work, and local heroes like Chicago&#8217;s legendary radio host Studs Terkel.</p>
<p>Also, Moore&#8217;s skeptical worldview is genuinely amusing, and in the film&#8217;s (and the book&#8217;s) best bits, he succeeds at pulling pranks that reveal a lot about the corrupted way &#8216;The Big One&#8217; works. One successful prank that upset the White House is shown early on, when Moore writes cheques from such self-created groups as &#8216;Hemp Growers for Bill Clinton&#8217; and &#8216;Abortionists for Pat Buchanan&#8217; which were promptly cashed by the politicians &#8211; despite their professed abhorrence for the causes involved.</p>
<p>In another scene, he offers to issue a cheque worth 65 cents to one company which has just closed down a U.S.-based factory, so that it can afford to pay one hour of wages for the first Mexican worker it hires in its new location.</p>
<p>Behind the jokes &#8211; some of which work, and some of which simply fall flat &#8211; is a look at a working-class America that is more anxious about job loss, more alienated from government and more depressed about the future. Corporate executives &#8211; several of whom are seen shutting Moore out of their offices or responding to his questions with stilted bromides about staying &#8220;competitive&#8221; in a globalised world &#8211; seem part of an entirely different world.</p>
<p>In the movie&#8217;s high point, Nike Chief Executive Officer Phil Knight explains that his shoe firm doesn&#8217;t own U.S. factories because Americans &#8220;don&#8217;t really want to make shoes.&#8221;</p>
<p>When confronted with a video of Michigan workers asserting that they would gladly work for Nike jobs, Knight cynically counters that workers may say that, but don&#8217;t actually want to face the same task of making shoes that foreign workers perform &#8211; an implicit admission that they simply don&#8217;t want to work for wages below the U.S. minimum and poor conditions.</p>
<p>Knight, by the way, shows similar tactlessness when Moore asks him whether he would feel bad about 14-year-olds working to make Nike shoes, as happens in Indonesia. &#8220;No,&#8221; the cheerful Nike boss responds.</p>
<p>At such times, &#8216;The Big One&#8217; &#8211; the film and the nation &#8211; can be darkly amusing, but not really funny at all.</p>
		]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ipsnews.net/1998/05/cinema-usa-the-united-states-the-big-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
