<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Inter Press ServiceECONOMY: Problems of Post-Soviet Integration</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.ipsnews.net/1999/03/economy-problems-of-post-soviet-integration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.ipsnews.net/1999/03/economy-problems-of-post-soviet-integration/</link>
	<description>News and Views from the Global South</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2026 06:14:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>ECONOMY: Problems of Post-Soviet Integration</title>
		<link>https://www.ipsnews.net/1999/03/economy-problems-of-post-soviet-integration/</link>
		<comments>https://www.ipsnews.net/1999/03/economy-problems-of-post-soviet-integration/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IPS Correspondents</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Active Citizens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy & Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headlines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipsnews.net/?p=70879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Analysis -  Sergei Blagov]]></description>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font color="#999999"><p class="wp-caption-text">Analysis -  Sergei Blagov</p></font></p><p>By IPS Correspondents<br />MOSCOW, Mar 4 1999 (IPS) </p><p>Former Soviet republics are heralding a new era of integration but they face a rocky road ahead before there can be any real economic union.<br />
<span id="more-70879"></span><br />
In an effort to boost integration, Tajikistan last week became the fifth member of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) to join a customs union aimed at freeing trade. The other countries are Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan.</p>
<p>Russian president Boris Yeltsin told the gathering that &#8220;there was no other alternative than cooperation.&#8221; It would be wrong to abandon integration efforts because of the current economic crisis, he added.</p>
<p>The creation of the CIS in 1991 sealed the fate of the collapsing Soviet Union. It loosely groups 12 ex-Soviet republics, while the customs union represents a core of countries that have proclaimed they want closer integration.</p>
<p>The council of all CIS heads of state was scheduled to meet in Moscow on Feb. 26 but the summit was postponed due to growing disagreements between member-states.</p>
<p>Some ex-Soviet republics have gained confidence in their ability to survive without Moscow &#8211; they are increasingly looking outside the &#8220;near abroad,&#8221; as Russia calls the ex-Soviet states.<br />
<br />
Uzbekistan already has announced its intention to leave the collective security treaty, and Azerbaijan and Georgia have indicated they may follow &#8211; which would further unravel the alliance.</p>
<p>Only six of the 12 members of the CIS had so far agreed to renew their membership.</p>
<p>Most economists agree that the industrial output of the CIS states has halved in the 8 years of the bumpy transition from Soviet-era centralised planning to a market economy.</p>
<p>The CIS&#8217;s gross domestic product (GDP) currently stands at four percent but original projections of an increase to six percent by the year 2005 are unlikely to materialise, economists say.</p>
<p>Russian officials have complained about the low level of CIS cooperation. Trade turnover within the customs union &#8211; and among CIS states as well &#8211; is &#8220;miserably low&#8221; and continues to fall, says Vladimir Levchenko, a CIS expert with the Russian trade ministry.</p>
<p>Likewise, Russia&#8217;s foreign trade turnover plummeted in 1998 due to the economic crisis and falling commodities prices.</p>
<p>According to official statistics, foreign trade turnover last year dropped by 17 per cent compared with 1997, while the trade with CIS states fell by 15 per cent.</p>
<p>Russia&#8217;s overall trade turnover with countries outside the former Soviet Union totaled 105 billion dollars in 1998, while the CIS and Baltics trade stood at some 20 billion dollars &#8211; of which about one-quarter was trade with customs union members.</p>
<p>Despite the decline, Russia managed to end the year with a positive trade balance of about 5 billion dollars &#8211; compared to a balance of 11.2 billion in 1997.</p>
<p>The decision to invite war-thorn Tajikistan into the customs union is widely viewed as a political gesture &#8211; rather than an economic move. According to government estimates, the recent civil war in Tajikistan claimed tens of thousands of lives and cost 7 billion dollars &#8211; a devastating amount for a country whose national budget in 1998 amounted to just 230 million dollars.</p>
<p>&#8220;We need to support Tajikistan politically,&#8221; observed Kazakh president Nursultan Nazarbayev who went on to say that deeper integration within the customs union is not going to affect ties between CIS states. Nazarbayev has been re-elected chairman of the Inter-State Council of the customs union.</p>
<p>Trade between Russia and Tajikistan dropped to 159 million dollars last year from 185 million dollars in 1997 &#8211; a huge plunge as compared with the estimated 2.9 billion dollars figure of the Soviet-era.</p>
<p>Olga Koroleva, a Tajikistan expert with the Russian trade ministry, told IPS that these days Russo-Tajik trade amounts to just 0.1 per cent of the overall turnover of Russia&#8217;s foreign trade.</p>
<p>Analysts say there are few economic dividends for Russia in its customs union &#8211; notably with Belarus, where economic reform has lagged and which owes Russia 200 million dollars for gas.</p>
<p>Russia and the former Soviet republic of Belarus also have signed separate treaties pledging even closer ties by establishing a union state including the two former Soviet republics. On December 25, 1998 Russia and Belarus signed agreements to introduce a single currency and a uniform system of taxation by 1999.</p>
<p>On April 2, 1997 Yeltsin and Belarussian President Alexander Lukashenko signed a treaty pledging Russia to union with its ex- Soviet neighbour, boosting political, economic and military ties between the two nations &#8211; but stopping short of creating one state.</p>
<p>The authoritarian Lukashenko &#8211; who swept to victory in 1994 on his promises of reuniting with Russia &#8211; has pushed for uniting his nation of 10 million people with Russia&#8217;s 147 million people.</p>
<p>As far as Central Asia is concerned, Russia remains the main trading partner with its southern neighbours, and the crisis has had a big impact on Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan.</p>
<p>Russia&#8217;s falling rouble has adversely affected trade, and some countries have opted to erect new trade barriers.</p>
<p>In January 1999 Kazakhstan &#8211; five times the size of France with a population of around 16 million &#8211; announced restrictions on the import of Russian food stuffs, a total of 21 items. Paradoxically the move did not contradict the respective provision of the customs union which reads that if the national producers&#8217; interests are endangered, import restrictions can be applied.</p>
<p>Kazakhstan also introduced 200 percent tariffs on imports from Kyrgyzstan &#8211; a landlocked nation about the size of Britain and with a population of 4.5 million.</p>
<p>Calls for closer economic integration in the CIS are falling on deaf ears, because the body is failing to implement its own decisions, according to analysts.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the customs union &#8211; designed for fostering free trade &#8211; also lacks economic substance and even could be counterproductive in terms of post-Soviet integration, some analysts argue. Thus the CIS could end up splitting into blocs, which would lead to the eventual collapse of the Commonwealth.</p>
		<p>Excerpt: </p>Analysis -  Sergei Blagov]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ipsnews.net/1999/03/economy-problems-of-post-soviet-integration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
