<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Inter Press ServiceDISARMAMENT: Discrepancies Paralyse UN Conference</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.ipsnews.net/2000/01/disarmament-discrepancies-paralyse-un-conference/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.ipsnews.net/2000/01/disarmament-discrepancies-paralyse-un-conference/</link>
	<description>News and Views from the Global South</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2026 06:14:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>DISARMAMENT: Discrepancies Paralyse UN Conference</title>
		<link>https://www.ipsnews.net/2000/01/disarmament-discrepancies-paralyse-un-conference/</link>
		<comments>https://www.ipsnews.net/2000/01/disarmament-discrepancies-paralyse-un-conference/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gustavo Capdevila</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Geopolitics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipsnews.net/?p=76182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gustavo Capdevila]]></description>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font color="#999999"><p class="wp-caption-text">Gustavo Capdevila</p></font></p><p>By Gustavo Capdevila<br />GENEVA, Jan 20 2000 (IPS) </p><p>The United Nations (UN) Conference on Disarmament opened its annual period of sessions in the same climate of discord that has paralysed its operations for the last three years.<br />
<span id="more-76182"></span><br />
The outlook for overcoming this stagnation depends on the results of bilateral meetings organised by the current president of the Conference on Disarmament (CD), Harald Kreid, of Austria.</p>
<p>For now, it is impossible to reach any conclusion about the possibility of resolving the differences in the short term, Kreid said during Thursday&#8217;s plenary session.</p>
<p>After it conducts a poll of the 66 member states, and if the results are not discouraging, the CD president&#8217;s office plans to request the negotiating blocs to assess several proposed solutions.</p>
<p>In practice, CD members are grouped into two large blocs: the non- aligned countries (Group of 21) that demand multilateral talks on nuclear disarmament, and the more-developed nations (Western Group) that place priority on bilateral negotiations.</p>
<p>The Conference&#8217;s work was blocked again this year, following the approval of the agenda, when it came time to decide on the work programme for carrying out the agenda&#8217;s eight points.<br />
<br />
The only new variable as this year&#8217;s sessions opened was the harshness of the criticisms levelled against this negotiating forum, including a rebuke by UN secretary general Kofi Annan, and statements from across the international spectrum.</p>
<p>In a message to the Conference, Annan observed &#8220;the deplorable lack of progress on disarmament and international security issues, which the international community considers the highest priority.&#8221;</p>
<p>The secretary general called for &#8220;genuine measures of nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation, and a way to prevent an arms race in outer-space.&#8221;</p>
<p>CD president Kreid admitted that conditions for renewing the forum&#8217;s work after the holiday recess &#8220;have not improved.&#8221;</p>
<p>As occurred during the two previous annual sessions, most of the delegates from CD member countries attribute the break-down in negotiations to the increasing deterioration of relations in the international sphere.</p>
<p>The current status of the disarmament and non-proliferation issues is even more complicated than last year, acknowledged Argentinean negotiator Guillermo González.</p>
<p>Annan himself discribed the negative climate when he pointed out that negotiations on the START treaty, between the United States and Russia, have stalled.</p>
<p>The short term outlook for implementing the Comprehensive Nuclear Test-Ban Treaty is discouraging as well, because the US Congress failed to ratify the agreement.</p>
<p>Annan emphasised that a treaty for banning the production and export of fissile material &#8220;has not even begun to be negotiated,&#8221; and that the Non-Proliferation Treaty review process is &#8220;shrouded in uncertainty.&#8221;</p>
<p>Kreid called on CD members to weigh the consequences of the changing international environment and decide whether &#8220;we resign ourselves to the role of vicitms of circumstances beyond our control, or demonstrate to the outside world that the CD is able to render its services.&#8221;</p>
<p>Reappearing on the Conference agenda are the perennial issues of nuclear disarmament and stopping the nuclear arms race, preventing nuclear war, and preventing the arms race in outer space.</p>
<p>The rest of the issues refer to safety guarantees for non-nuclear countries, new forms of mass destruction, a comprehensive disarmament programme and transparency on weapons issues.</p>
<p>In order to make progress on these agenda items, the CD must designate an ad hoc group or a co-ordinator to promote discussions and agreements between the various parties.</p>
<p>Kreid recognised that it would be difficult to reach a consensus in naming these mediators. But he proposed that the group begin informal and open talks on setting up these groups for studying two issues: nuclear disarmament and weapons in outer space.</p>
<p>The Pakistan-India conflict, which led to military confrontations and the creation of nuclear arsenals in the two neighbouring countries, had its repercussions on the Conference.</p>
<p>Pakistani delegate Munir Akram proposed that the CD take up the issue of regional and subregional disarmament, which would include the tensions between Pakistan and India.</p>
<p>But India&#8217;s delegate, Savitri Kunadi, pointed out that her government had already rejected the Pakistani proposal in the UN General Assembly, and warned that it would continue its opposition within the Conference.</p>
		<p>Excerpt: </p>Gustavo Capdevila]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ipsnews.net/2000/01/disarmament-discrepancies-paralyse-un-conference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
