<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Inter Press ServiceINDIA: Plays Down Border Clash with Bangladesh</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.ipsnews.net/2001/04/india-plays-down-border-clash-with-bangladesh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.ipsnews.net/2001/04/india-plays-down-border-clash-with-bangladesh/</link>
	<description>News and Views from the Global South</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 18:02:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>INDIA: Plays Down Border Clash with Bangladesh</title>
		<link>https://www.ipsnews.net/2001/04/india-plays-down-border-clash-with-bangladesh/</link>
		<comments>https://www.ipsnews.net/2001/04/india-plays-down-border-clash-with-bangladesh/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ranjit Devraj</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia-Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipsnews.net/?p=92398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ranjit Devraj]]></description>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font color="#999999"><p class="wp-caption-text">Ranjit Devraj</p></font></p><p>By Ranjit Devraj<br />NEW DELHI, Apr 20 2001 (IPS) </p><p>India has played down the massacre of 16 of its border troops by Bangladeshi soldiers this week to avoid straining ties with the friendly government in Dhaka, say analysts.<br />
<span id="more-92398"></span><br />
New Delhi believes that the incident was engineered by religious fundamentalist forces inimical to Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, on the eve of national elections in that country.</p>
<p>At least 16 personnel of India&#8217;s para-military Border Security Force (BSF) were killed Wednesday in exchanges of fire, following incursions by Bangladesh border troops into India&#8217;s eastern border Meghalaya and Assam states.</p>
<p>By Thursday, the Bangladesh Rifles ended a four-day siege of the village of Pyrdiwah. The Indian foreign ministry spokesman said the &#8220;status quo ante&#8221; had been restored.</p>
<p>This is the first time that the two countries, which share a 4,000 km boundary, have seen a border clash of this severity.</p>
<p>India&#8217;s Foreign Minister, Jaswant Singh parried charges by opposition leaders in parliament that the incidents were the result of intelligence failure.<br />
<br />
Officially, Dhaka has attributed the incidents to &#8220;local adventurism&#8221;.</p>
<p>However, the view in New Delhi is that the incidents were engineered to mar major diplomatic gains in bilateral relationship ever since Hasina&#8217;s Awami League took office five years ago.</p>
<p>India had intervened militarily to help the Awami League lead Bangladesh to independence from Pakistan in December 1971 and install Hasina&#8217;s father, Sheikh Mujibur Rehman as the new country&#8217;s first prime minister.</p>
<p>But after Rahman was killed along with most of his family members in a bloody army coup in 1975, bilateral relations quickly soured. Disputes emerged over border issues, large-scale cross-border migration and the sharing of the waters of the Himalayan Ganges river.</p>
<p>Soon after taking office in mid-1996, Hasina signed a 30-year treaty with India on the sharing of the Ganges waters. But her arch political rival and immediate predecessor, Begum Khaleda Zia described it as a &#8220;sell-out&#8221; to India.</p>
<p>Zia&#8217;s main opposition Bangladesh National Party has agitated to get the treaty scrapped.</p>
<p>Two years ago, Indian Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee inaugurated a direct bus service between Calcutta, now known as Kolkata, the capital of India&#8217;s West Bengal state, which borders Bangladesh, and Dhaka.</p>
<p>The declared aim of the bus service is to restore links between people with close cultural affinities and who share the Bengali language.</p>
<p>Wednesday&#8217;s incidents over a piece of disputed territory were uncharacteristically violent considering that various other bilateral disputes have been resolved by negotiation.</p>
<p>Political analysts here note that Bangladesh&#8217;s main opposition party, which was set up mainly by Zia&#8217;s assassinated husband and former military dictator Zia Ur Rehman, has a pronounced anti-India stance. It is openly backed by Islamic fundamentalist groups in Bangladesh, they say.</p>
<p>Zia&#8217;s party has also organised street protests to stall plans for export of Bangladesh&#8217;s abundant natural gas reserves to energy-hungry India.</p>
<p>According to former top Indian foreign policy official S.K. Singh, Hasina&#8217;s government is well placed in the coming election. It has been successful in improving the country&#8217;s economy through exports, rural banking and population control, he says.</p>
<p>&#8220;The fundamentalist forces which have been traditionally close to Pakistan and to that country&#8217;s Inter Services Intelligence, are now feeling restless,&#8221; adds Singh, now a leading media commentator.</p>
<p>Singh, who is known to have close contacts with key government figures in Bangladesh, thinks that the governments of both countries have &#8220;seen through the spoilers&#8217; game and handled the situation well.&#8221;</p>
<p>An editorial published in the respected Statesman newspaper Friday commented: &#8220;Sheikh Hasina knows that such a border flare up would do irreparable damage to her image in India where she is looked upon as a close friend and ally.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hasina&#8217;s arch-rival Zia was quoted by newspapers as saying that the &#8220;subservient government&#8221; (of Bangladesh) had regularly failed to counter frequent attacks on Bangladesh border troops and civilians.</p>
<p>The Statesman newspaper, published from Calcutta, also carried an article, which attributed the incidents to internal politics in Bangladesh.</p>
<p>It noted that the timing of the incidents immediately before the general elections in that country, was significant.</p>
<p>&#8220;Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina will be hard put to call off any action against India without inviting further criticism from her political opponents,&#8221; the article said.</p>
<p>&#8220;Laying siege on Pyrdiwah sends out a strong message to the electorate that while being friends with India, Bangladesh won&#8217;t sacrifice the country&#8217;s interests,&#8221; it commented.</p>
<p>The incidents have embarrassed Vajpayee&#8217;s Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), which leads the federal ruling coalition. The BJP faces crucial provincial elections in Assam in June.</p>
<p>BJP spokesman Vijay Kumar Malhotra demanded that the government take the &#8220;strongest possible action and tell Bangladesh that such incidents would not be tolerated.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Bangladesh should understand that New Delhi wants good neighbourly relations but would not take such incidents lying down,&#8221; Malhotra said.</p>
<p>Bangladesh is completely surrounded by the Indian states of West Bengal, Assam, Meghalaya and Tripura. These provinces have long complained about the mass influx of impoverished Bangladeshi labourers.</p>
<p>The regional Assam Gana Parishad party, which rules Assam was set up two decades ago over the &#8220;foreigners&#8221; issue. Local people have long accused the Indian government of deliberately ignoring the mass influx of settlers from Bangladesh.</p>
		<p>Excerpt: </p>Ranjit Devraj]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ipsnews.net/2001/04/india-plays-down-border-clash-with-bangladesh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
