<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Inter Press ServicePOLITICS-U.N.: Most Security Council Members Back Inspections</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.ipsnews.net/2003/01/politics-un-most-security-council-members-back-inspections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.ipsnews.net/2003/01/politics-un-most-security-council-members-back-inspections/</link>
	<description>News and Views from the Global South</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 15:48:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>POLITICS-U.N.: Most Security Council Members Back Inspections</title>
		<link>https://www.ipsnews.net/2003/01/politics-un-most-security-council-members-back-inspections/</link>
		<comments>https://www.ipsnews.net/2003/01/politics-un-most-security-council-members-back-inspections/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2003 19:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Haider Rizvi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Geopolitics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipsnews.net/?p=3306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Haider Rizvi]]></description>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font color="#999999"><p class="wp-caption-text">Haider Rizvi</p></font></p><p>By Haider Rizvi<br />UNITED NATIONS, Jan 29 2003 (IPS) </p><p>Mindful of the deadly consequences of an impending U.S. war against Iraq, most members of the United Nations Security Council have made it clear that they want a peaceful end to the dispute over Iraq&#8217;s alleged possession of weapons of mass destruction.<br />
<span id="more-3306"></span><br />
&#8221;The majority of the Council is in favour of disarming Iraq peacefully and of more time for inspections,&#8221; French Ambassador Jean-Marc de la Sabliere told reporters Wednesday on the sidelines of a Security Council meeting.</p>
<p>&#8221;The inspections started just two months ago. They should continue.&#8221;</p>
<p>The French ambassador welcomed the U.S. decision to present a report next week to the Security Council, which the administration of President George W. Bush says will prove that Iraq possesses the outlawed weapons. &#8221;It&#8217;s useful that inspectors get this information,&#8221; said de la Sabliere.</p>
<p>But Russian Ambassador Sergey Lavrov was more sceptical. The U.S. report, to be delivered by Secretary of State Colin Powell Feb. 5, has to be &#8221;undeniable and convincing&#8221;, he said.</p>
<p>The ongoing inspections &#8221;are useful, efficient, and have to be continued&#8221;, Lavrov added.<br />
<br />
Syrian envoy Mikhail Wehbe told reporters that 10 Council members in the closed-door meeting voiced their support for the move to give inspectors &#8221;more time&#8221; for inspections.</p>
<p>Dismissing the U.S. charge that Iraq was already in &#8221;material breach&#8221; of resolution 1441, which in November sent the inspectors back into Iraq after they were expelled by President Saddam Hussein in 1998, Wehbe recalled that &#8221;neither Hans Blix nor Mohammed El-Baradei, the chief U.N. inspectors, have said anything about material breach&#8221;.</p>
<p>On Monday, the inspectors gave their first progress reports to the Council. While El-Baradei said inspectors had found no trace that Iraq continues to develop nuclear weapons, Blix complained that Hussein was cooperating only minimally with the team of 260 inspectors.</p>
<p>Describing the U.S. policy on Iraq as destructive, the Syrian ambassador, who represents the only Arab nation currently sitting in the Security Council, said, &#8221;Everybody in the (Middle East) region is saying no to war.&#8221;</p>
<p>Other non-permanent members of the Council also rejected the U.S. stance on inspections.</p>
<p>&#8221;I think the general view is that the inspections should be given a chance,&#8221; said Pakistan&#8217;s Ambassador Munir Akram, whose country is on the frontlines of the U.S. &#8221;war on terrorism&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8221;I do not wish to say how long&#8221; they should last, he added.</p>
<p>Iraqi cooperation was &#8221;unsatisfactory&#8221;, added Mexican envoy Adolfo Aguilar Zinser, but the inspectors&#8217; request for more time must be considered in a &#8221;positive manner&#8221;, he said.</p>
<p>Last November, when the United States and France were locked in a diplomatic battle over the wording of resolution 1441, Mexico stood at a distance from its powerful northern neighbour.</p>
<p>Many diplomats on Wednesday also noted that the resolution sets no time limit for inspections.</p>
<p>Noting that &#8221;hundreds of inspections have been carried out since November&#8221;, German Ambassador Gunter Pleuger, who is president of the Council in February, urged the Council to let the inspections continue.</p>
<p>&#8221;Never before were the inspectors so well equipped,&#8221; he said. &#8221;Let us not put away the investment, which we recently created.&#8221;</p>
<p>But U.S. Ambassador John Negroponte told reporters, &#8221;The diplomatic window is closing. The time for decision-making is fast approaching. The situation is urgent. It is pressing.&#8221;</p>
<p>Asked why the inspectors have so far failed to find the weapons that U.S. officials claim are in Iraq, Negroponte said, &#8221;It&#8217;s not the job of inspectors to go under every rock in Iraq.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8221;The burden of proof is definitely on Iraq itself, which has to fully and completely declare its weapons holdings and, secondly, to cooperate unconditionally, immediately and proactively with inspectors.&#8221;</p>
<p>On Tuesday, Bush spoke with German President Gerald Schroeder about next week&#8217;s briefing. Germany has voiced its opposition to war against Iraq more strongly than any other western nation.</p>
<p>The U.S. president is also scheduled to meet U.K. Prime Minister Tony Blair on Friday and Italian premier Silvio Berlusconi on Thursday.</p>
<p>Negroponte said while next week&#8217;s briefing will reveal U.S. intelligence on Iraqi weaponry, it may also contain proof of U.S. claims that Iraq has links to terrorist groups, including al-Qaida.</p>
<p>A kilometre away from the U.N. building at Times Square, thousands of Americans gathered to echo the views of members of the Security Council while chanting: &#8221;No blood for oil. Not in our name.&#8221;</p>
		<p>Excerpt: </p>Haider Rizvi]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ipsnews.net/2003/01/politics-un-most-security-council-members-back-inspections/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
