<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Inter Press ServicePOLITICS: U.S. Congressmen Take Anti-War Case to U.N. Chief</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.ipsnews.net/2003/01/politics-us-congressmen-take-anti-war-case-to-un-chief/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.ipsnews.net/2003/01/politics-us-congressmen-take-anti-war-case-to-un-chief/</link>
	<description>News and Views from the Global South</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 15:48:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>POLITICS: U.S. Congressmen Take Anti-War Case to U.N. Chief</title>
		<link>https://www.ipsnews.net/2003/01/politics-us-congressmen-take-anti-war-case-to-un-chief/</link>
		<comments>https://www.ipsnews.net/2003/01/politics-us-congressmen-take-anti-war-case-to-un-chief/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2003 20:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Haider Rizvi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Geopolitics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipsnews.net/?p=3333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Haider Rizvi]]></description>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font color="#999999"><p class="wp-caption-text">Haider Rizvi</p></font></p><p>By Haider Rizvi<br />UNITED NATIONS, Jan 30 2003 (IPS) </p><p>Two members of the U.S. Congress working against a possible attack by Washington on Iraq brought their message to the United Nations on Thursday.<br />
<span id="more-3333"></span><br />
John Conyers Jr. and Jim McDermott told United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan that they are preparing two resolutions that urge President George W. Bush to stay away from the military adventure in Iraq.</p>
<p>&#8221;We react to the people. More and more people are becoming aware of this issue,&#8221; said McDermott, a Democrat from Washington state, referring to growing nationwide protests against the war.</p>
<p>Last October, the House of Representatives granted Bush power to invade Iraq without the approval of the U.N. Security Council, a move that was also endorsed by the Senate. The new resolution seeks to curtail the president&#8217;s powers and supports the ongoing process of inspections.</p>
<p>&#8221;There&#8217;s a gradual shift of mood in the U.S. Congress,&#8221; said Conyers, a Democrat from Michigan state. &#8221;People are waking up. They want their voices to be heard.&#8221;</p>
<p>If the administration decided to go to war alone, the consequences would affect both the United Nations and the United States, the lawmakers said. &#8221;I don&#8217;t think they (the administration) have thought through the implications,&#8221; McDermott told reporters after his meeting with Annan.<br />
<br />
&#8221;The U.N. was created after the two world wars to try and prevent war from happening again,&#8221; he added.</p>
<p>Some experts believe the war resolution passed in October was illegal. &#8221;Such an invasion would violate the U.N. Charter, which was signed and ratified by the United States. Article six of the U.S. Constitution declares such international treaties as supreme law,&#8221; says Stephen Zunes, a professor of politics at the University of San Francisco</p>
<p>Zunes thinks one reason why some Democrats are rushing to stop the war is their defeat in the November elections. &#8221;Among their fear is (that) a resurgent and clearly anti-war Green party could capture enough liberal votes to cause the Democrats defeat in the 2004 election.&#8221;</p>
<p>But Conyers said their motivations are not partisan. &#8221;Some of us have to think about what effects the war would have on the United Nations.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8221;The difficulty of going alone (on war) undermines the U.N., which the U.S might regret in the future,&#8221; he added.</p>
<p>Added McDermott, &#8221;The Vietnam war was ended by the American people. It was not ended by the members of Congress. The power in our system comes from the people.&#8221;</p>
<p>On Jan. 18, hundreds of thousands of Americans took to the streets in various cities protesting against a possible war. More giant demonstrations are planned for Feb. 15, in the United States and world-wide.</p>
<p>The two Congressmen admitted they might not succeed in checking the president&#8217;s powers to wage a war against Iraq. &#8221;Until the troops march, there&#8217;s hope. But if you don&#8217;t try, there&#8217;s no chance,&#8221; said McDermott.</p>
		<p>Excerpt: </p>Haider Rizvi]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ipsnews.net/2003/01/politics-us-congressmen-take-anti-war-case-to-un-chief/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
