<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Inter Press ServicePOLITICS-JAPAN: Territorial Rows Undercutting Pacifist Stance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.ipsnews.net/2010/11/politics-japan-territorial-rows-undercutting-pacifist-stance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.ipsnews.net/2010/11/politics-japan-territorial-rows-undercutting-pacifist-stance/</link>
	<description>News and Views from the Global South</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 05:40:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>POLITICS-JAPAN: Territorial Rows Undercutting Pacifist Stance</title>
		<link>https://www.ipsnews.net/2010/11/politics-japan-territorial-rows-undercutting-pacifist-stance/</link>
		<comments>https://www.ipsnews.net/2010/11/politics-japan-territorial-rows-undercutting-pacifist-stance/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Suvendrini Kakuchi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Armed Conflicts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia-Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development & Aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Geopolitics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipsnews.net/?p=43839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Suvendrini Kakuchi]]></description>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font color="#999999"><p class="wp-caption-text">Suvendrini Kakuchi</p></font></p><p>By Suvendrini Kakuchi<br />TOKYO, Nov 16 2010 (IPS) </p><p>Thorny territorial disputes with neighbours China and Russia  appear to nudging Japan&rsquo;s pacifist public toward accepting  what has so far been an unpalatable prospect: a more assertive  and militarily strong country.<br />
<span id="more-43839"></span><br />
Almost 80 percent of those polled in a survey released on Nov. 8 by Japan&rsquo;s NHK public television showed growing frustration with their socialist-leaning Prime Minister Naoto Kan over his handling of tensions over territorial rows. Many pointed to his &#8220;weak&#8221; diplomacy as the second most important reason, after the stagnating economy, for their disappointment in him.</p>
<p>&#8220;Japan&rsquo;s hands are tied when it comes to rapping China and Russia over the territorial disputes,&#8221; Hisashi Manabu, a 62-year-old company employee said, referring to the post-war Constitution that prohibits Japan from rebuilding its military after its World War II defeat. &#8220;The stark reality is that we must be responsible for our own protection.&#8221;</p>
<p>The current round of tensions with China stems from Japan&rsquo;s detention of a Chinese captain on Sep. 7 after he rammed his fishing boat against a Japanese Naval Coast Guard ship. It had ordered him off the Senkaku islands, which China calls the &lsquo;Diaoyutai&rsquo;. The skipper was later released after strong protests by Beijing, which also claims ownership of the islands.</p>
<p>In many ways, China&rsquo;s growing influence in Asia, not to mention its becoming the world&rsquo;s second biggest economy this year, has led to a new awareness in Japan of its own vulnerability, analysts say.</p>
<p>This is despite the security umbrella provided by the 1965 Japan-U.S. Security Pact, which obliges the United States to come to Japan&rsquo;s defence in case of military attack.<br />
<div id='related_articles'>
 <h1 class="section">Related IPS Articles</h1>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://ipsnews.net/2010/06/politics-japan-us-pact-crucial-to-balance-of-power-in-east-asia" >POLITICS: Japan-U.S. Pact Crucial to Balance of Power in East Asia</a></li>
<li><a href="http://ipsnews.net/2010/05/japan-promised-us-base-relocation-made-to-be-broken" >JAPAN: Promised U.S. Base Relocation: Made to Be Broken?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://ipsnews.net/2009/05/north-korea-japan-has-little-leverage-over-volatile-neighbour" >NORTH KOREA: Japan Has Little Leverage Over Volatile Neighbour</a></li>
</ul></div><br />
Understandably, Japan is happy to see the U.S. government engaging more deeply in Asia, reflected in U.S. President Barack Obama&rsquo;s 10-day tour of the region in November. Meeting with Kan in November, he called the U.S. relationship with Japan the &#8220;cornerstone&#8221; of U.S. engagement in the Asia-Pacific.</p>
<p>&#8220;Nationalism is getting stronger on both sides. The territorial clash with China has revealed how little Tokyo is prepared to deal with the crisis both in military and diplomatic terms,&#8221; explained Prof Takashi Inoguchi, international relations expert at Niigata prefectural university.</p>
<p>For now, more time is needed to let the testy ties between China and Japan, whose historical relationship is already marred by Japan&rsquo;s colonisation of parts of China decades ago, calm down. Indeed, Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshito Sengaku told the press that Japan-China ties are important but &#8220;need time&#8221; to be repaired, as both countries have to be sensitive to their domestic constituencies.</p>
<p>For example, thousands of Japanese shouted anti-Chinese slogans against Chinese President Hu Jintao when he was in Yokohama for the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit on Nov. 13. During the past month, Chinese groups have also held anti-Japan demonstrations in several cities in China.</p>
<p>Japanese diplomacy has also been facing a severe test on the Russian front after President Dmitry Medvedev ignored a warning from the Japanese government, and on Nov. 1 visited Kunashiri island, which is among the four islands that two countries claim. Japan calls them the Northern Territories and Russia, the Southern Kurils.</p>
<p>Medvedev declared on Kunashiri that the island, which is under Russian administration, belongs to Russia, touching a sensitive chord among Japanese who point angrily to the then Soviet Union&rsquo;s invasion of the islands four days after Japan&rsquo;s surrender on Aug. 15, 1945. Medvedev was the first Russian president to visit the island, and this row has prevented Japan and Russia from signing a formal peace treaty after World War II.</p>
<p>These open challenges that China and Russia threw at Japan have pushed Tokyo to step up moves to court the United States, an approach that is quite a departure from earlier pronouncements by Kan&rsquo;s socialist-leaning government. When it took office in June 2010, it promised to align Japan closer with its Asian neighbours.</p>
<p>Likewise, Japan&rsquo;s leading daily, the &lsquo;Yomiuri&rsquo;, reported that the Defence Ministry plans to beef up the country&rsquo;s military, called the Self Defence Forces, by sending a new unit to the Yonekuni island, which lies in close proximity to the Senkaku islands.</p>
<p>The unit will monitor via radar the movements of Chinese warships that have increasingly been active in the East China Sea, defence ministry officials say.</p>
<p>Japan has also been busy investing in its security by cultivating ties with neighbours ranging from South Korea to India, another China rival.</p>
<p>Tokyo has started negotiations with Seoul on mutual exchanges of classified military information &ndash; an unprecedented initiative that defies the countries&rsquo; troubled past, which has roots in Japan&rsquo;s colonisation of the Korean peninsula. Sharing military information, however, is a common interest to keep watch over Stalinist North Korea&rsquo;s nuclear programme.</p>
<p>On Oct. 25, Japan and India signed an Economic Partnership Agreement that aims to foster enhanced economic relations within the next 10 years. A &#8220;timely and strategic move to contain China&rsquo;s maritime expansion in the East China Sea&#8221; was how the &lsquo;Yomiuri&rsquo; newspaper called this development.</p>
<p>&#8220;The new thrust by Japan takes place against a historic shift in power in East Asia with the rise of China&rsquo;s influence,&#8221; said Prof Yuichi Hosoya, who specialises in international politics at Keio University.</p>
<p>But he expresses the hope that these diplomatic maneuverings, which will continue as Asia reacts to China&rsquo;s clout, would lead to a more balanced power configuration, and not more instability, in the region. Said Hoyosa: &#8220;A stronger Japan supporting the United States must become not a threat to Beijing, but rather produce a balance of power in Asia that will be welcomed by all.&#8221;</p>
<div id='related_articles'>
 <h1 class="section">Related Articles</h1>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://ipsnews.net/2010/06/politics-japan-us-pact-crucial-to-balance-of-power-in-east-asia" >POLITICS: Japan-U.S. Pact Crucial to Balance of Power in East Asia</a></li>
<li><a href="http://ipsnews.net/2010/05/japan-promised-us-base-relocation-made-to-be-broken" >JAPAN: Promised U.S. Base Relocation: Made to Be Broken?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://ipsnews.net/2009/05/north-korea-japan-has-little-leverage-over-volatile-neighbour" >NORTH KOREA: Japan Has Little Leverage Over Volatile Neighbour</a></li>
</ul></div>		<p>Excerpt: </p>Suvendrini Kakuchi]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ipsnews.net/2010/11/politics-japan-territorial-rows-undercutting-pacifist-stance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
