<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Inter Press ServiceMega Dams Remain Controversial Source of Energy</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.ipsnews.net/2016/06/mega-dams-remain-controversial-source-of-energy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.ipsnews.net/2016/06/mega-dams-remain-controversial-source-of-energy/</link>
	<description>News and Views from the Global South</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 13:46:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Mega Dams Remain Controversial Source of Energy</title>
		<link>https://www.ipsnews.net/2016/06/mega-dams-remain-controversial-source-of-energy/</link>
		<comments>https://www.ipsnews.net/2016/06/mega-dams-remain-controversial-source-of-energy/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2016 03:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lyndal Rowlands</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Armed Conflicts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biodiversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development & Aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy & Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eye on the IFIs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integration and Development Brazilian-style]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPS UN: Inside the Glasshouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poverty & SDGs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regional Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TerraViva United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade & Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mega dams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nubians]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipsnews.net/?p=145454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although mega dams can have devastating impacts on ecosystems and indigenous communities, many of the world’s poorest countries still see them as a way to fill gaping holes in their energy supplies. One such project is the Inga III dam, in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). The dam is a part of the larger [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Although mega dams can have devastating impacts on ecosystems and indigenous communities, many of the world’s poorest countries still see them as a way to fill gaping holes in their energy supplies. One such project is the Inga III dam, in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). The dam is a part of the larger [&#8230;]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ipsnews.net/2016/06/mega-dams-remain-controversial-source-of-energy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
