<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Inter Press ServiceWeaponizing Free Trade Agreements</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.ipsnews.net/2022/07/weaponizing-free-trade-agreements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.ipsnews.net/2022/07/weaponizing-free-trade-agreements/</link>
	<description>News and Views from the Global South</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 18:01:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Weaponizing Free Trade Agreements</title>
		<link>https://www.ipsnews.net/2022/07/weaponizing-free-trade-agreements/</link>
		<comments>https://www.ipsnews.net/2022/07/weaponizing-free-trade-agreements/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2022 06:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anis Chowdhury  and Jomo Kwame Sundaram</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development & Aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy & Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TerraViva United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade & Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPS UN Bureau]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.ipsnews.net/?p=176816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Long seen as means to seek advantage on the pretext of providing mutual benefit, free trade agreements (FTAs) may increasingly be used as economic weapons in the emerging new Cold War. Pivot to Asia, containing China In November 2009, President Obama observed, “in an inter-connected world, power does not need to be a zero-sum game… [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Anis Chowdhury  and Jomo Kwame Sundaram<br />SYDNEY and KUALA LUMPUR, Jul 5 2022 (IPS) </p><p>Long seen as means to seek advantage on the pretext of providing mutual benefit, free trade agreements (FTAs) may increasingly be used as economic weapons in the emerging new Cold War. </p>
<p><strong>Pivot to Asia, containing China</strong><br />
In November 2009, President Obama <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6U81KNpyXPI" rel="noopener" target="_blank">observed</a>, “in an inter-connected world, power does not need to be a zero-sum game… the United States does not seek to contain China”.<br />
<span id="more-176816"></span></p>
<p><div id="attachment_162824" style="width: 190px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-162824" src="https://www.ipsnews.net/Library/2019/08/Anis-Chowdhury_180.jpg" alt="" width="180" height="232" class="size-full wp-image-162824" /><p id="caption-attachment-162824" class="wp-caption-text">Anis Chowdhury</p></div>But Obama soon changed course with his ‘<a href="https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2015/11/16/fact-sheet-advancing-rebalance-asia-and-pacific" rel="noopener" target="_blank">pivot to Asia</a>’, first announced in November 2011. After his re-election in 2012, the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) became the economic centrepiece of the new US strategy to check China’s growth and technological progress.</p>
<p>His US Trade Representative (USTR) claimed the TPP was based on principles the US champions, such as protecting <a href="https://ustr.gov/tpp/Summary-of-US-objectives" rel="noopener" target="_blank">intellectual property</a> (IP) and human rights. While claiming all who accept its principles would be welcome to join, China was conspicuously not among countries negotiating the TPP.</p>
<p>For Washington, this new rivalry with China involves strengthened US alliances with Japan, South Korea and Australia. In October 2011, the US Congress ratified the Korea-US (KORUS) FTA.</p>
<p>With the military and economic containment of China central to US security strategy, the TPP was concluded in 2015. Obama <a href="https://www.yahoo.com/news/pacific-rim-nations-sign-us-led-trade-deal-234210619--finance.html?ref=gs" rel="noopener" target="_blank">emphasized</a>, “TPP allows America – and not countries like China – to write the rules of the road in the 21st century.” </p>
<p>Creating an “anyone but China club” was <a href="https://www.ft.com/content/08cf74f6-c216-11e2-8992-00144feab7de" rel="noopener" target="_blank">the US motive</a> for establishing the TPP. But with changed public sentiment since Trump’s presidency, once Obama’s loyal Vice-President, now President Biden did not attempt to revive the TPP during his presidential campaign, or since. </p>
<p><strong>Security alliances</strong><br />
“American prosperity and security are challenged by an economic competition playing out in a broader strategic context… We must work with like-minded allies and partners to ensure our principles prevail and the rules are enforced so that our economies prosper”, noted President Trump’s <a href="https://www.lewik.org/term/28636/pillar-ii-promote-american-prosperity/" rel="noopener" target="_blank">national security strategy</a>.</p>
<p><div id="attachment_157782" style="width: 190px" class="wp-caption alignright"><img decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-157782" src="https://www.ipsnews.net/Library/2018/09/jomo_180.jpg" alt="" width="180" height="212" class="size-full wp-image-157782" /><p id="caption-attachment-157782" class="wp-caption-text">Jomo Kwame Sundaram</p></div>Accordingly, the ‘<a href="https://www.cfr.org/in-brief/quad-indo-pacific-what-know" rel="noopener" target="_blank">Quad</a>’ – Quadrilateral Security Dialogue group for maritime cooperation of the US, Australia, India and Japan, initiated after the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami – has become a putative anti-China security arrangement.</p>
<p>By 2020, leaders of all four countries were more aligned in their concerns about China’s rise. In November 2020, navies of all four countries participated in their <a href="https://apnews.com/article/australia-india-china-bay-of-bengal-japan-107488c6cc4419396d61328fb5ed8b38" rel="noopener" target="_blank">first joint military exercise in over a decade</a>. </p>
<p>Meanwhile, under Shinzo Abe, Japan <a href="https://tnsr.org/2018/05/japans-security-policy-in-the-abe-era-radical-transformation-or-evolutionary-shift/" rel="noopener" target="_blank">radically transformed</a> its security policy. Abe has greatly expanded the Japan Self-Defence Forces’ role, mission and capabilities within and beyond the US-Japan alliance, especially in East Asia. </p>
<p>‘Defence cooperation’ has also been enhanced through country-to-country arrangements, such as the recent <a href="https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/japan-and-australia-ties-blossom" rel="noopener" target="_blank">Japan-Australia Reciprocal Access Agreement</a> as well as the earlier <a href="https://www.mofa.go.jp/press/release/press4e_002896.html" rel="noopener" target="_blank">Japan-India Acquisition and Cross Servicing Agreement</a>.</p>
<p>The US security profile in the region has been boosted by the AUKUS (Australia-UK-USA) alliance. Its <a href="https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/aukus-more-meets-eye" rel="noopener" target="_blank">clear intention</a> is to enhance the US and its allies military presence in the Indo-Pacific, with the greatest ‘China focus’ of all regional security arrangements.</p>
<p><strong>World hegemony </strong><br />
The US is also linking trade to its national security strategy, especially to contain China, in Africa and Latin America. As the <a href="https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/reports/2021/2021 Trade Agenda/Online PDF 2021 Trade Policy Agenda and 2020 Annual Report.pdf" rel="noopener" target="_blank">USTR notes</a>, “The Biden Administration is conducting a comprehensive review of U.S. trade policy toward China as part of its development of its overall China strategy”. <div id='related_articles'>
 <h1 class="section">Related IPS Articles</h1>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.ipsnews.net/2016/07/us-government-report-exposes-exaggerated-tppa-growth-claims/" >US Government Report Exposes Exaggerated TPPA Growth Claims</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.ipsnews.net/2016/05/conjuring-growth-from-the-trans-pacific-partnership-tpp/" >Conjuring Growth from the Trans-Pacific Partnership TPP</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.ipsnews.net/2016/04/opinion-the-empires-new-clothes-conjuring-growth-from-the-tpp/" >The Empire’s New Clothes? Conjuring Growth from the TPP</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.ipsnews.net/2016/02/tpps-threat-to-multilateralism/" >TPP’s Threat To Multilateralism</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.ipsnews.net/2016/02/tpp-lessons-from-new-zealand/" >TPP: Lessons from New Zealand</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.ipsnews.net/2016/01/the-trans-pacific-partnership-fraud/" >The Trans-Pacific Partnership Fraud</a></li>
</ul></div></p>
<p>Her office also emphasizes, “Addressing the China challenge will require a comprehensive strategy and more systematic approach than the piecemeal approach of the recent past.”</p>
<p>Reflecting his <em><a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/NSC-1v2.pdf" rel="noopener" target="_blank">Interim National Security Strategic Guidance</a></em>, Biden emphasizes, “The United States must renew its enduring advantages…; modernize our military capabilities…; and revitalize America’s unmatched network of alliances and partnerships”. He notes “growing rivalry with China, Russia… reshaping every aspect of our lives”.</p>
<p>Biden insists his administration “will make sure that the rules of the international economy are not tilted against the United States. We will enforce existing trade rules and create new ones… This agenda will strengthen our enduring advantages, and allow us to prevail in strategic competition with China or any other nation”. </p>
<p>His administration announced a review of all Trump-era trade negotiations. Due to expire in 2025, President Clinton’s <a href="https://ustr.gov/issue-areas/trade-development/preference-programs/african-growth-and-opportunity-act-agoa#:~:text=AGOA%20provides%20eligible%20sub%2DSaharan,Generalized%20System%20of%20Preferences%20program." rel="noopener" target="_blank">African Growth and Opportunity Act</a> has offered enhanced US market access to qualifying African countries since 2000.</p>
<p>In April 2021, Secretary of State Antony Blinken <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-29/u-s-keen-to-complete-free-trade-talks-with-kenya-blinken-says" rel="noopener" target="_blank">confirmed</a> US-Kenya FTA talks would resume. <a href="https://www.csis.org/analysis/forgotten-power-trade" rel="noopener" target="_blank">Observers believe</a> the US-Kenya FTA, initiated by Trump in 2020, would help expand US ‘carrot and stick’ trade and security policies on the continent to counter China.</p>
<p>In the US ‘<a href="https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/monroe-doctrine#:~:text=The%20Monroe%20Doctrine%20is%20the,further%20colonization%20or%20puppet%20monarchs." rel="noopener" target="_blank">Monroe doctrine</a> backyard’, six US FTAs already involve 12 Latin American and Caribbean countries. On 8 June, Biden announced a new regional economic partnership to counter China. His speech inaugurated a Summit of the Americas, <a href="https://edition.cnn.com/2022/06/09/politics/biden-summit-of-the-americas-day-two/index.html" rel="noopener" target="_blank">criticized</a> for omitting countries seen as friendly to China.</p>
<p>But Biden’s <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/06/08/fact-sheet-president-biden-announces-the-americas-partnership-for-economic-prosperity/" rel="noopener" target="_blank">Americas Partnership for Economic Prosperity</a> is still seen as a <a href="https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/bidens-plan-pitch-latin-america-reboot-summit-dogged-by-dispute-dissent-2022-06-08/" rel="noopener" target="_blank">work in progress</a>. Not even offering FTAs’ standard tariff relief, the US anticipates initially focusing on “like-minded partners”. Although Biden hailed his “ground-breaking, integrated new approach”, responses suggest <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-06-10/biden-s-lackluster-los-angeles-summit-exposes-divided-hemisphere#xj4y7vzkg" rel="noopener" target="_blank">“waning” US influence</a>.</p>
<p>Now, five years after Trump withdrew from the TPP, Biden has revived Obama’s China strategy with his own Indo-Pacific Economic Framework. Smug, he could not help but echo Obama’s TPP brag, “<a href="https://www.aa.com.tr/en/asia-pacific/biden-revives-strategic-pivot-to-asia-to-contain-china-s-influence/2601457" rel="noopener" target="_blank">We’re writing the new rules</a>”. </p>
<p>IPS UN Bureau</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div id="authorarea">
<a href="https://twitter.com/IPSNewsUNBureau" class="twitter-follow-button" data-show-count="false" data-lang="en" data-size="large">Follow @IPSNewsUNBureau</a><br />
<script>!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],p=/^http:/.test(d.location)?'http':'https';if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src=p+'://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js';fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document, 'script', 'twitter-wjs');</script>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="https://www.instagram.com/ipsnewsunbureau/" target="_blank"><img decoding="async" src="http://www.ipsnews.net/Library/2020/11/instagram-logo-ipsnewsunbureau_3_.jpg" style="display: block; border: 0px; min-height: auto; outline: none; text-decoration: none;" height="44" width="200"></a></div>
<div id='related_articles'>
 <h1 class="section">Related Articles</h1>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.ipsnews.net/2016/07/us-government-report-exposes-exaggerated-tppa-growth-claims/" >US Government Report Exposes Exaggerated TPPA Growth Claims</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.ipsnews.net/2016/05/conjuring-growth-from-the-trans-pacific-partnership-tpp/" >Conjuring Growth from the Trans-Pacific Partnership TPP</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.ipsnews.net/2016/04/opinion-the-empires-new-clothes-conjuring-growth-from-the-tpp/" >The Empire’s New Clothes? Conjuring Growth from the TPP</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.ipsnews.net/2016/02/tpps-threat-to-multilateralism/" >TPP’s Threat To Multilateralism</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.ipsnews.net/2016/02/tpp-lessons-from-new-zealand/" >TPP: Lessons from New Zealand</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.ipsnews.net/2016/01/the-trans-pacific-partnership-fraud/" >The Trans-Pacific Partnership Fraud</a></li>
</ul></div>		]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ipsnews.net/2022/07/weaponizing-free-trade-agreements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
