Stories written by Thalif Deen
Thalif Deen, Senior Editor & Director, UN Bureau, Inter Press Service (IPS) news agency has been covering the United Nations since the late 1970s. Beginning with the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro in 1992, he has covered virtually every major U.N. conference: on population, human rights, the environment, sustainable development, food security, humanitarian aid, arms control and nuclear disarmament.
As the former UN Bureau Chief for IPS, he was cited twice for excellence in U.N. reporting at the annual awards presentation of the U.N. Correspondents' Association (UNCA). In November 2012, he was on the IPS team which won the prestigious gold medal for reporting on the global environment-- and in 2013, he shared the gold, this time with the UN Bureau Chief of Reuters news agency, for his reporting on the humanitarian and development work of the United Nations.
A former information officer at the U.N. Secretariat, he served twice as a member of the Sri Lanka delegation to the UN General Assembly sessions. His track record includes a stint as deputy news editor of the Sri Lanka Daily News and senior editorial writer on the Hong Kong Standard. As military analyst, he was also Director, Foreign Military Markets at Defense Marketing Services; Senior Defense Analyst at Forecast International; and military editor Middle East/Africa at Jane’s Information Group. He was a longstanding columnist for the Sri Lanka Sunday Times, U.N. correspondent for Asiaweek, Hong Kong and Jane's Defence Weekly, London. A Fulbright scholar with a Master’s Degree (MSc) in Journalism from Columbia University, New York, he is co-author of the 1981 book on “How to Survive a Nuclear Disaster” and author of the 2021 book on the United Nations titled “No Comment – and Don’t Quote me on That”— and subtitled ‘from the Sublime to the Hilarious’, both of which are available on Amazon
When U.S. President George W. Bush recently enunciated his new military doctrine of ”pre-emptive” strikes on countries developing weapons of mass destruction (WMD), he specifically warned Iraq, Iran and North Korea to clean up their acts or face dire consequences.
The much-publicised looting of television sets and furniture from several shops in Baghdad last week was ''chicken feed”, says a cynical Arab diplomat with tongue firmly entrenched in cheek. ''Wait until the American oil companies lay their hands on Iraq. That's when the real looting begins.''
After 24 days of economic and human devastation in Iraq, a shell-shocked Middle East can expect a frighteningly negative fallout from the U.S.-led war, according to a senior U.N. official.
The rising number of civilian deaths in Iraq - caused mostly by heavy U.S. firepower - has evoked strong protests and condemnation by senior U.N. officials and global human rights and humanitarian groups.
The United States, which went to battle with Iraq by short-circuiting the United Nations, has magnanimously promised a ''vital role'' for the world body in post-war Iraq.
The United Nations is underlining the stark irony of an average war-battered Iraqi family being assured of at least one month's food stocks while its African counterpart has to literally make do with nothing.
U.S. military forces so far have dropped over 8,700 bombs, including more than 3,000 missiles, and fired millions of rounds of ammunition on military and civilian targets in Iraq - they may have unleashed virtually all their state-of-the-art weaponry on an already-devastated country.
When the dust finally settles on post-war Iraq, the United States may have unleashed virtually all of its state-of-the-art weaponry on a country already devastated by 13 years of rigid U.N. sanctions.
The United States, whose military attack on Iraq has been roundly condemned by the international community, is trying to silence the highest policy-making body at the United Nations: the 191-member General Assembly.
After refusing to provide legitimacy to a U.S.-led war on Iraq last week, the 15-member U.N. Security Council is heading for a new standoff, this time over humanitarian assistance to displaced Iraqis and the creation of a post-war U.S. military authority in Baghdad.
The U.S. decision to bypass the United Nations in its war against Iraq last week has not only hurt the world body but has also drawn Secretary-General Kofi Annan into a controversy over his pre-war edict ordering U.N. workers to bail out of Baghdad before the bombs fell.
The United States could win a unilateral war against Iraq because of its overwhelming military might, but it will still have to come back to a multilateral body like the United Nations to help reconstruct the devastated country, diplomats and senior U.N. officials said Wednesday.
Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) condemned the U.S. decision to abandon multilateral diplomacy in favour of a unilateral military attack against Iraq on Tuesday, with some calling for an emergency session of the General Assembly to try and prevent war.
Former U.N. secretary-general Dag Hammarskjold once remarked that the United Nations was not created to take mankind to paradise, but merely to save humanity from hell.
In a desperate attempt to garner nine votes for a U.N. resolution justifying a military attack on Iraq, the United States and Britain have tried every trick in the political cook book: bribe, cajole, arm-twist and even threaten some members of the Security Council with economic reprisals.
The largest single coalition of developing nations - the 116-member Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) - is appealing to six of its members in the U.N. Security Council to vote against a proposed resolution for a war on Iraq.
At the height of the Cold War in the 1960s, a former Peruvian diplomat characterised the United Nations as a politically wobbly institution that survives only at the will - and pleasure - of the world's big powers.
How the U.N. Security Council deals with the Iraq crisis will signal whether it can successfully treat the most profound problem in the Middle East region: Palestinian-Israeli relations, U.N. chief Kofi Annan said Monday.
He also warned that if the United States were to attack Iraq without returning to the Security Council, such a move would violate the U.N. charter.