- Development & Aid
- Economy & Trade
- Human Rights
- Global Governance
- Civil Society
Tuesday, April 23, 2019
Lidia Hunter* - Tierramérica
MANAGUA, Sep 13 2003 (IPS) - Nicaragua is once again dreaming of building an inter-ocean route – one that would make the Panama Canal look tiny. But the mega-project, which would take 10 years to complete and would cost more than 25 times the national budget, could be catastrophic for the environment, say ecologists.
There are four projects under consideration for connecting the Atlantic and Pacific oceans via different routes across Nicaragua. The goal is to be able to transport volumes of cargo that the Panama Canal cannot handle.
To date, only the government has proposed a water-only route. If approved, the canal must guarantee "absolute control over sovereignty and ecology," Arturo Harding, Nicaragua’s environment minister, told Tierramérica.
Harding is a member of a governmental commission that is drawing up a preliminary study to determine whether canal construction would be feasible.
Jorge Huezo, also on the commission, told Tierramérica that the studies should be ready by the end of the year, and then a legislative bill would be sent to congress "in order to give the country a legal framework for negotiating mega-projects, particularly the canal."
The route "would be much bigger than the Panama Canal – if it is built," said Harding.
The Nicaraguan canal would serve "a different type of market than Panama’s," as the new route would be able to handle 250,000-ton ships, compared to the 50,000-ton vessels that make the Panamanian crossing, Harding explained.
According to a profile drawn up by Nicaraguan experts in 2000, a canal that is one kilometre wide and 400 km long would cost 20 to 25 billion dollars. Nicaragua’s national budget does not surpass one billion dollars annually.
Construction would take place through contracts granted in an international bidding process.
The canal would begin in Brito, in the southwestern department of Rivas on the Pacific coast, and end on the Caribbean coast, in the department of Atlántico Sur.
The study includes a project to reforest 40,000 square km, which would require an annual budget of 150 million dollars.
"It is not enough to reforest" the areas affected by canal construction, says Anfer López, head of campaigns at the non-governmental conservationist Humboldt Centre.
The canal could introduce transmissible disease and would create a physical barrier to movement throughout Nicaraguan territory, which would be divided by the water route.
The centre also warns that the mega-project would alter the ecosystems that support the lifestyles of indigenous communities and would violate international environmental treaties.
The investors "are interested in having their canal, but who is going to take responsibility for curbing the collateral impacts it produces? Who is going to make sure that the construction companies are held accountable?" asks López.
A project of this magnitude will have major environmental impacts, and the aim to build the canal is like "putting a sword to the neck", because the country does not have a legal framework for water use, said activist Kamilo Lara, of the non-governmental Soluciones Ambientales (Environmental Solutions).
Responding to criticisms, Harding said that "poverty is the leading cause of environmental destruction" in Nicaragua. And if things continue as they are, with 45 percent of the population of 5.4 million living in poverty, in 15 years the environmental degradation produced by poverty could be much worse than that caused by the canal, he said.
In addition to the government’s plan for a canal, there are two proposals for building an inter-ocean railroad.
The Intermodal System for Global Transport (SIT Global), involving Nicaraguan and Canadian entrepreneurs, proposes a railway with an oil pipeline and fibre optic cable running parallel. Environmental impact studies for the project will begin this year.
Another group, the Inter-Ocean Canal of Nicaragua, proposes building two ports, one on the Atlantic, the other on the Pacific, united by 400 km of railroad.
The consortium is working on the design and geo-engineering studies of the two port terminals, its promoters said in August.
The fourth plan is the Eco Canal, a small project compared with the others, to consist of an internal route for smaller ships to carry merchandise containers along the existing waterways of the San Juan River and Lake Cocibolca (also known as Lake Nicaragua).
Minister Harding says the three private initiatives could complement the government’s canal plans.
(* Lidia Hunter is a Tierramérica contributor. Originally published Sep.. 6 by Latin American newspapers that are part of the Tierramérica network. Tierramérica is a specialised news service produced by IPS with the backing of the United Nations Development Programme and the United Nations Environment Programme.)
IPS is an international communication institution with a global news agency at its core,
raising the voices of the South
and civil society on issues of development, globalisation, human rights and the environment
Copyright © 2019 IPS-Inter Press Service. All rights reserved. - Terms & Conditions
You have the Power to Make a Difference
Would you consider a $20.00 contribution today that will help to keep the IPS news wire active? Your contribution will make a huge difference.