In January, the government of Algeria succeeded in locking two civil society groups out of access to the United Nations (UN). It raised questions at the UN
Committee on Non-Governmental Organizations, known as the NGO Committee, about two civil society groups with accreditation. It alleged that Italian organisation Il Cenacolo was making politically motivated statements at the UN Human Rights Council and the Geneva-based International Committee for the Respect and Implementation of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (CIRAC) was selling UN grounds passes. Four days later, it called a vote to revoke their status. Other states urged delay, but the no-action motion failed, and
11 of the body’s 19 members voted to recommend that the UN’s Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) revoke Il Cenacolo’s accreditation and suspend CIRAC’s for a year.
On 19 March, the
Commission on the Status of Women (CSW) did something unprecedented in its eight-decade history: it held a vote. The Trump administration, having spent two weeks attempting to defer, amend and ultimately block the session’s main outcome document, known as the agreed conclusions, cast the only vote against its adoption. That dissenting vote said a lot, as it came from the world’s most powerful government, backed by financial leverage, bilateral reach and a network of anti-rights states and organisations that are making inroads at many levels.
When German Chancellor Friedrich Merz opened the 62nd
Munich Security Conference by declaring that the post-war rules-based order ‘no longer exists’, there was plenty of evidence to back his claim. Israel is committing genocide in Gaza in defiance of international law, Russia is four years into its illegal invasion of Ukraine, the last nuclear arms control treaty between Russia and the USA has just expired and the USA has withdrawn from 66 international bodies and commitments. Since the conference, Israel and the USA have launched another war on Iran, threatening to spark a broader regional conflict. Meanwhile the UN is undergoing a funding crisis, cutting staff and programmes, and civil society organisations that relied on US Agency for International Development funding are facing closure.
The latest World Economic Forum made clear the current crisis of multilateralism. Over 60 heads of state and 800 corporate executives assembled in Davos under a ‘Spirit of Dialogue’ theme aimed at strengthening global cooperation, but it was preceded by a series of events pointing to a further unravelling of the international system.
In early January, an emergency UN Security Council
meeting on Venezuela followed a familiar path of paralysis. Members clashed over the US government’s
abduction of Nicolás Maduro, with many warning it set a dangerous precedent, but no resolution came.
Algorithms
decide who lives and dies in Gaza. AI-powered surveillance tracks
journalists in Serbia. Autonomous weapons are
paraded through Beijing’s streets in displays of technological might. This isn’t dystopian fiction – it’s today’s reality. As AI reshapes the world, the question of who controls this technology and how it’s governed has become an urgent priority.
Donald Trump’s bullying tactics ahead of NATO’s
annual summit, held in The Hague in June, worked spectacularly. By threatening to
redefine NATO’s
article 5 – the collective defence provision that has anchored western security since 1949 – Trump won
commitments from NATO allies to almost triple their defence spending to five per cent of GDP by 2035. European defence budgets will
balloon from around US$500 billion to over US$1 trillion annually, essentially matching US spending levels.
When tanks rolled through
Myanmar’s streets in 2021, civil society groups worldwide sounded the alarm. When Viktor Orbán systematically
dismantled Hungary’s free press, democracy activists demanded international action. And as
authoritarianism returns to Tanzania ahead of elections, it’s once again civil society calling for democratic freedoms to be respected.
When the next pandemic strikes, the world should be better prepared. At least, that’s the promise states made at the World Health Organization’s (WHO) World Health Assembly on 19 May when they
adopted the first global pandemic treaty. This milestone in international health cooperation emerged from three years of
difficult negotiations, informed by the harsh lessons learned from COVID-19’s devastating global impacts.
The world’s population is ageing. Global life expectancy has leapt to
73.3 years, up from under 65 in 1995. Around the world, there are now
1.1 billion people aged 60-plus, expected to rise to 1.4 billion by 2030 and 2.1 billion by 2050.
This demographic shift is a triumph, reflecting public health successes, medical advances and better nutrition. But it brings human rights challenges.