ADDRESSING HARMFUL DRINKING GLOBALLY: EMPHASIS ON STRATEGY

By Marcus Grant Reprint | | Print |

This column is available for visitors to the IPS website only for reading. Reproduction in print or electronic media is prohibited. Media interested in republishing may contact romacol@ips.org.

WASHINGTON, Oct 20 2010 (IPS) - The World Health OrganizationÂ’s (WHO) adoption this year of a Global Strategy to Reduce Harmful Use of Alcohol was historic not only for being much-needed and long-awaited, but also for being focused on what can feasibly be done, and done now. As nations around the world assess the burdens they attribute to harmful drinking and what they can do, the Alcohol Strategy provides compelling impetus and guidance for immediate action. WHO recommends 10 target areas for action, with a helpful reframing of policy options in an arena where “solutions” in the past have been few and often highly proscriptive. The Alcohol Strategy also invites a diverse array of contributors to the table – making a clean break from times when alcohol policy was typically made in forums that excluded the people who know a great deal about alcohol, the producers. WHO has acknowledged that “economic operators in alcohol production are important players” in the hard work ahead to reduce alcohol-related harm, and further states that alcohol companies are “especially encouraged to consider effective ways to prevent and reduce harmful use of alcohol.” As president of an organization that has been working with alcohol companies for 15 years to help reduce harmful drinking worldwide and encourage cross-sector dialogue and partnerships, I welcome this call to action. Far more significant is the fact that WHO is urging nations to address the harmful use of alcohol as part of a larger, well-reasoned “strategy.” Past regulatory approaches have at times profoundly lacked strategic elements. In many countries around the world, although well-intentioned, governments have often taken rather simplistic approaches to a complex matter. And in countries where resources are scarce, those resources have often been used up by measures yielding disappointing outcomes, or even unintended negative results. In fact, WHO points out a discrepancy “between the increasing availability and affordability of alcohol beverages in many low- and middle-income countries and those countriesÂ’ capability and capacity to meet the possible additional public health burden that follows.” To be successful, approaches to reduce harmful drinking should bear in mind that the issue is not consumption of alcohol, but harmful consumption. It is not availability of alcohol per se that is problematic, but the consequences we see when people drink problematically. For example, where taxes and prices have been raised in an attempt to restrict availability and consumption, such efforts have often led to increases in black market activity because access to legitimate alcohol has been too severely restricted. And from Eastern Europe to Africa and Asia-Pacific, we have seen far too many injuries and deaths where people turn to illicitly brewed alcohol or alcohol “substitutes” not intended for human consumption. Research has consistently shown that chronic, problem drinkers are the least likely to change their behavior and drink less if prices increase. They may switch to less expensive drinks, they may drink at home more and go out less, but they will always find a way to drink. Even when and where alcohol has been – or is – completely prohibited, those determined to drink excessively do so. Contrary to what the more vocal critics of the alcohol industry may presume, some of the people most concerned and knowledgeable about combating harmful drinking are actually the people who produce alcohol beverages. Producers have developed, supported and participated in programs with government and law enforcement agencies, educational institutions, public health organizations and retailers to prevent drunk driving, underage consumption and other harmful alcohol use and have a good deal of knowledge to share about these programs – and enthusiasm to share in others. For example, there is the work of Global Actions on Harmful Drinking (www.global-actions.org), a consortium of initiatives dedicated to helping reduce the harmful use of alcohol. This work is the result of a collective commitment made by the chief executives of major international alcohol beverage producers to make a significant effort in the 2010-2012 timeframe to address harmful drinking through a combination of global and local actions. The initiatives place an emphasis on low- and middle-income countries – with a focus on drunk driving, self-regulation of alcohol marketing, and non-commercial (illicit) alcohol. These efforts follow the same line of thinking reflected in WHOÂ’s Alcohol Strategy: What is required is a range of options so that different countries and communities can select which combination of measures is likely to work best for them, given their drinking culture and health priorities. There is promise in such approaches that are developed enough to work in practice, not just in theory. As alcohol producers work in concert with health professionals, governments, and civil society to reduce the harmful use of alcohol, more is now possible. With the benefit of a new sense of stakeholder partnership and guidance from WHO, there is strength in numbers and there is a feasible strategy for what can be done, and done now. (END/COPYRIGHT IPS)

(*) Marcus Grant is President of the International Center for Alcohol Policies (ICAP) This column is part of a series of opinion articles and interviews about corporate social and environmental responsibility, supported by Anheuser-Busch InBev.