- Development & Aid
- Economy & Trade
- Human Rights
- Global Governance
- Civil Society
Thursday, February 21, 2019
OAKLAND, California, Dec 7 2011 (IPS) - Five months ago, Gayla Newsome was at work when she got the call. A sheriff had come to her home of 15 years and put her two pajama-clad daughters out on the curb of her West Oakland street. Newsome knew the bank was about to foreclose, but thought she still had time to fight it.
On Tuesday, she marched in triumph back to her former abode – along with some 75 supporters. It was Occupy Our Homes Day across the nation, feted by Occupy organisations in more than 20 cities; it was a day to condemn the bank seizure of more than one million U.S. homes in 2010.
Newsome’s home will be occupied 24/7 by volunteers from Occupy Oakland and the Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment.
“I’m here to reclaim what belongs to me and to the community,” Newsome said, standing in front of the home, as a masked man affixed a “Save Gayla’s home” banner to the front of the two-story townhouse.
The day of actions marked a new direction for Occupy Oakland and many other Occupies which have been chased from their tent cities. Their decision to use a “diversity of tactics” can translate into occupying a foreclosed house one day or calling a general strike the next – whatever they can do to continue to shine a glaring light on what the Occupy Oakland General Assembly has called “a deliberate Wall Street strategy that has made billions for those at the top while devastating the 99 percent”.
“Unfortunately, the situation is poised to get worse as more adjustable rate mortgages reset, unemployment rates remain unabated, and subprime lending persists, particularly in communities of color,” the report says.
Before marching the half-block to her foreclosed home, Newsome, who is African American, addressed supporters at Defermery Park, underscoring the legacy of activism in Oakland, and noting in particular that Defermery Park was a significant gathering place for the Black Panther movement.
Newsome talked about losing her home. After losing a job and falling behind in her mortgage, she tried to work with Chase Bank for a loan modification.
“I kept faxing loan modification applications,” she said. “I kept calling; they said they never got it. I faxed it again; they said they never saw it.”
Finally, the bank turned down the modification and foreclosed on the property, which is now advertised as “WONDERFUL FAMILY HOME IN FENCED COMMUNITY; 3 BEDROOM, 2.5 BATHS IN MOVE IN CONDITION. MUST SEE!!!!” Newsome said saving her home was more than trying to help her family – it was part of stopping the rapid gentrification of West Oakland. “I’m not just here personally to reclaim my house,” she said, “I’m here to encourage people to reclaim this community.”
Earlier in the day, about a mile from Newsome’s home, Nell Myhand from Causa Justa addressed a crowd at the West Oakland subway station. Putting the housing crisis into perspective, Myhand condemned the federal government for disinvestment in affordable housing.
“For the last 30 years, they have neglected public housing (and) failed to put any pressure on developers around affordable housing,” she said. “That set us up for the banks to then target us for predatory loans.”
These sub-prime loans were directed to black, Latino and elders in three East Oakland neighbourhoods, and “cost our communities wealth and even our health,” she said.
Stress, blight and crime are just some of the consequences foreclosures have on entire neighbourhoods, further devastating communities of colour “that have suffered from decades of policies rooted in discrimination”, says the “Rebuilding Neighborhoods” report.
Margarita Ramirez’s family also suffered a foreclosure. Speaking in Spanish, with English translation, she addressed the crowd at the subway station, explaining that in 2009, her husband lost his job and consequently the family was unable to make house payments. They lost their East Oakland home.
They applied to Fannie Mae through the Bank of America, which serviced the loan, for a modification. But after submitting a series of documents, which the bank would lose time and again, Fannie Mae ultimately turned down the requested modification.
So they began working directly with the Bank of America for a modification, but after a few weeks got a notice that the home was sold to Fannie Mae. Both the Bank of America and Assemblymember Sandre Swanson tried to get Fannie Mae to rescind the sale, but it refused, Ramirez said.
Ramirez explained that Occupy Oakland and the housing organisations plan to occupy a vacant home near the West Oakland station owned by Fannie Mae. “We’re here to reoccupy Fannie Mae homes until they give us our home back,” she said.
In both the Ramirez and Newsome cases, the need to modify the terms of a loan came as a result of a period of unemployment.
“What has fueled the foreclosures in the last year and a half or so, has been the massive unemployment,” said Robbie Clark of Causa Justa, co-author of the “Rebuilding Neighborhoods” report.
The unemployment rate for people of colour in Oakland is significant: in 2010, African American unemployment in Oakland was 19.6 percent and Latino unemployment was 15.2 percent, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
Chanting “ain’t no power but the power of the people and the power of the people don’t stop,” the group of around 100 people left the subway station and marched three blocks to an unoccupied, foreclosed home owned by Fannie Mae. Activists decorated the home with placards such as “Give Back the Deed/Regresen El Titulo” and “welcome home.” They plan to turn the 121 year-old building into a center for classes on tenants’ and homeowners’ rights – in fact they had workshops scheduled for late afternoon. And they also said they would use the property for low-income housing.
Tenants spoke about how they were being pushed out by “Ellis Act evictions,” that is landlords who evict tenants when they quit the landlord business. These landlords can circumvent rent control and profit by turning their apartment buildings into condominiums.
“My entire family (grandparents, aunts, cousins) has lived together for more than 27 years,” Brenda Medina tearfully told the gathering in the Mission. “With rents being so high, we might be forced to move outside San Francisco,” and they may have to break up the mutually dependent family unit of several generations.
Wednesday morning at 2:18 a.m., the Occupy San Francisco communications team sent out a message saying the San Francisco encampment was being raided by police.
This story includes downloadable print-quality images -- Copyright IPS, to be used exclusively with this story.
IPS is an international communication institution with a global news agency at its core, raising the voices of the South
and civil society on issues of development, globalisation, human rights and the environment
Copyright © 2019 IPS-Inter Press Service. All rights reserved. - Terms & Conditions
You have the Power to Make a Difference
Would you consider a $20.00 contribution today that will help to keep the IPS news wire active? Your contribution will make a huge difference.