Crime & Justice, Democracy, Editors' Choice, Europe, Featured, Global Geopolitics, Global Governance, Headlines, Human Rights, Latin America & the Caribbean, North America, Press Freedom, Regional Categories, TerraViva Europe, TerraViva United Nations

Global Geopolitics

Snowden Is No Trifling Matter

Evo Morales at a press conference at U.N. headquarters in New York . Credit: Mathieu Vaas/IPS

MONTEVIDEO/WASHINGTON , Jul 4 2013 (IPS) - The suspicion that Bolivian President Evo Morales’ jet was carrying Edward Snowden, the former intelligence contractor who has become Washington´s public enemy number one, triggered an unprecedented international incident.

Four European countries – France, Italy, Spain and Portugal – denied Morales’ presidential jet permission to fly through their airspace on his way back from Moscow to La Paz.

Snowden, the former technical contractor for the National Security Agency (NSA) who released dozens of top secret documents proving that the U.S. government has been tapping global internet and phone systems on a massive scale, is in hiding in the Moscow airport.

Morales’ aircraft was rerouted and forced to land in Austria, where it was stuck on the tarmac for 14 hours. The governments implicated in the incident brandished technical explanations, and after hours of heated negotiations, the presidential jet was allowed to take off again.

While it was grounded, the plane and its passengers were apparently subjected to some kind of inspection, the scope of which is not yet clear. But afterwards, Austria’s foreign minister, Michael Spindelegger, stated that there were only Bolivian citizens in the aircraft.

The incident violates international law, because aircraft carrying national leaders have diplomatic immunity. Bolivian diplomats complained at the United Nations that Morales had been “kidnapped” during the time he was grounded in Austria. And the indignation spread to other South American governments.

An extraordinary meeting of the Union of South American Nations (UNASUR) has been convened for Thursday in the Bolivian city of Cochabamba to discuss the issue.
Morales, who along with other presidents from the region was in Russia for an oil and gas conference, had expressed sympathy for Snowden’s plight. The whistleblower has been desperately seeking asylum in different countries since his passport was revoked and he was charged with espionage. In the last few days Snowden has applied for asylum in 21 countries. But as of yet he hasn’t received a response from any government.

Washington has not tried to conceal its efforts to block any attempt to offer asylum to the 30-year-old former employee of defense contractor Booz Allen Hamilton.

But U.S. State Department spokesperson Jen Psaki largely evaded questions as to whether communications between the U.S. and the European countries which denied the airspace had led to the rerouting of Morales’ presidential jet. “Ask them,” she said.

She was only willing to acknowledge that U.S. officials had been in touch with “a broad range of countries” in recent days with regard to Snowden.

It is clear that some of those contacts bore fruit. After receiving a phone call from U.S. Vice President Joe Biden, Ecuadorean President Rafael Correa said that neither he nor officials in Quito had given authorisation for travel documents that the consul in London issued to Snowden.

The consul in question is in the Ecuadorean embassy in Britain, where Julian Assange, the founder of the WikiLeaks whistleblower website, has been living since June 2012. Assange was granted asylum by Ecuador in August 2012.

“While we still do not know what role the U.S. played (in rerouting the plane), it is hard to believe the U.S. did not exert pressure to ensure Snowden was not on the plane, as they apparently suspected,” Coletta Younger, senior fellow at the Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA), told IPS.

“It was a huge tactical blunder and a breach of diplomatic protocol (by whoever decided to deny the airspace). But it sent a strong message that whoever takes Snowden in will face serious repercussions from the U.S.,” she added.

“I think this could backfire. The Latin Americans are so outraged that it could facilitate the decision to take Snowden in,” Younger said.

Michael Shifter, president of the Washington-based Inter-American Dialogue think tank, said “It seems either the U.S. had something to do (with the decision to deny the airspace) or it was done out of a sense of solidarity with the U.S.

It is possible they made the decision alone based on a recognition of how serious this issue is to the U.S.”

Shifter said that normally such a drastic step would indicate a state of war. He described it as “An extreme overreaction…Whatever one thinks about Snowden or Morales, it seems like this was disrespectful of international law.”

He also said the incident “looks terrible in political terms.“It was out of proportion. It reflects a patronising, paternalistic mindset that stronger countries can bully weaker ones.”

But he disagreed with Younger that it would facilitate a Latin American refuge for Snowden. “What this ultimately underscores is how seriously the U.S. regards this case,” he said.

“It may be tempting to take Snowden in in order to needle the U.S., but the consequences of that will have to be taken into consideration. The U.S., for all its weaknesses, is still the U.S.,” he said.

Republish | | Print | |En español

  • Anne Ewing

    This action was not only a huge diplomatic blunder and a violation of international law,
    it was blatantly, outrageously racist, demonstrating utter white-guy contempt for President Evo Morales. Let’s please not miss that point in this discussion.

  • lightweaver1213

    I am not sure how to feel about the Snowden situation. I regard his leaks of top secret documents about our country to be regarded as espionage on one hand, but the flip side of this situation is the fact that the US was engaged in a global activity it had no business being in and I regard the invasion of another country’s privacy to be as great an issue as what Snowden is charged with. How could world leaders ever trust the US knowing it has conspired in a corrupt manner. And yes, it is corrupt because it is unethical and probably very illegal in every sense of the word.

    Likewise, Americans could look at President Obama and consider his unlawfulness as he is not doing right by the American people. I really believe he just doesn’t get it, and I think until the end of is term that he’ll slide by the seat of his pants with no real gains being made for the US citizens.

    It is really senseless and a waste of everyone’s time and money to cause such a ruckus over the Snowden situation and quite honestly the efforts of the US could be much more wisely spent elsewhere.

  • WilliamVague

    Morales is not the right kind of leader. In other words he is not subservient to the US and its European vassals. He is rather too democratic for the US which prefers dictatorships like Saudi or Qatar. International law means nothing to the most violent aggressive, country on earth and its serial killer of a leader.

  • Beth Kredel

    I’m sure that Much of the global community is doing the very same thing. Don’t kid yourself! If he did leak secret documents, he is a traitor! If he’s so smart, I think he could’ve found a better way to do what he did without leaking secrets and placing the US, our Allies, and operatives in danger!

  • Guest

    Showden is a hero in my view. He should be protected under the whistle-blower laws. The Constitution is being trashed. He is a whistle blower, not a criminal. Every American should require that all “official” activity be done only within the legal bounds of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. No one should be allowed to hide behind the concept of “security” as a means to act outside the law.

university of hawaii press