- Development & Aid
- Economy & Trade
- Human Rights
- Global Governance
- Civil Society
Monday, March 19, 2018
Clarinha Glock* - Tierramérica
PORTO ALEGRE, Brazil, May 16 2011 (IPS) - The adoption of a new Forest Code in Brazil could threaten efforts to curb Amazon deforestation, which was reduced 70 percent between 2004 and 2010.
“The proposal opens up a lot of gaps,” Tasso Azevedo, a forestry engineer and Ministry of Environment consultant on forests and climate, told Tierramérica.
In addition to reducing the so-called permanent preservation areas that must be reforested if cleared, it establishes an amnesty for landholders who have illegally cleared forests on their properties. Under the current legislation, they are subject to fines. “This makes it seem as if the law wasn’t made to be obeyed,” said Azevedo.
If this part of the proposal is approved, reforestation would no longer be required on up to 15 million hectares of land, according to the Ministry of Environment.
Under the current Brazilian Forest Code (Law 4771 of 1965), permanent preservation areas are areas that “play a role in preserving water resources, landscape, geological stability, biodiversity, the gene flow of flora and fauna, protecting the soil and ensuring the well-being of human populations.”
Legal reserves are areas within private landholdings deemed by the law to be “vital for the sustainable use of natural resources, conservation and rehabilitation of ecological processes and biodiversity, and the protection of native flora and fauna.”
In the Amazon rainforest region, 80 percent of the forested area on privately owned farmland must be set aside as a legal reserve, and therefore cannot be cleared.
For landholdings located in the Cerrado tropical savanna region within what is known as the “Amazônia Legal” (which covers nine of Brazil’s 26 states), 35 percent of forested land must be preserved, while 20 percent must be set aside as legal reserves in the rest of the country.
But there is no special protection for the rest of the Cerrado, an ecoregion spanning two million kilometers in central Brazil, where the rate of deforestation is twice that of the Amazon.
The Forest Code currently prohibits the clearing of forests on a strip of between 30 and 500 meters along the banks of rivers. Under the proposed changes, that requirement would be reduced to a 15-meter-wide strip. The amendments also open up the possibility of forgiving deforestation fines for landowners who register with the Environmental Regularisation Program, essentially an amnesty program, as well as owners of landholdings of 400 hectares or less, who would not be required to reforest cleared areas.
“The new Forest Code is an umbrella full of holes,” said Azevedo, adding that the bill tabled by Rebelo “is a different bill from the one that had been agreed upon. With a few small changes in wording, for example, mangroves were removed from the protected areas.”
The head of the ruling Workers Party bloc in the Chamber of Deputies, Cândido Vaccarezza, maintained that there would be no flexibility with regard to planting crops in permanent protection areas, and that any exceptions, under the criteria of public utility, social need and reduced environmental impact, would be regulated by decree.
In the meantime, the voluntary targets established by Brazil to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions are also at stake, since deforestation is the country’s main source of these emissions.
A national emissions inventory published in late 2010, but based on data from 2005, states that the country produced 2.2 billion tons of greenhouse gases annually. If the prevailing trends continued, annual emissions would reach 3.2 billion tons by 2020. However, the government pledged that it would reduce its emissions to two billion tons annually by that year.
“The Amazon rainforest is a reservoir of about 100 billion tons of carbon, sequestering more than 10 times the amount of carbon emitted globally each year,” notes the Brazil Low-Carbon Country Case Study, produced in 2010 by the World Bank after two years of research and consultation with scientists and representatives of 10 ministries dealing with sectors like energy, transportation and waste management.
The report proposes strategies to reduce the emission and increase the absorption of carbon, one of the main greenhouse gases contributing to global warming, as well as recommendations on financing mechanisms and public policy.
While the study does not address possible changes to the Forest Code, it does consider the effects of full compliance with the reforestation requirements under the current law.
“When trees are replanted, carbon is sequestered and there are benefits,” the lead author of the study, Christophe de Gouvello, told Tierramérica.
“But when the requirement to reforest is imposed, the area available for farming is reduced, and this leads to the risk that farmers will clear another part of the forest in order to continue planting,” he added. This phenomenon is commonly referred to as “leakage”.
The World Bank study recommends improving the agricultural yields on smaller areas of land, providing low-interest loans and incentives for intensive production systems, and adopting public policies to promote direct planting or zero-tillage cultivation and better training and monitoring for farmers.
It also proposes that better land use management can be achieved by raising productivity through the promotion of mixed crop and livestock systems and feedlot systems.
Azevedo noted that Brazil went beyond these recommendations with its National Climate Change Policy, adopted in 2009, which foresees a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions of between 36 and 38.9 percent by 2020, depending on whether GDP growth during the interim averages four or six percent a year, respectively.
To achieve this goal, priority has been placed on reducing deforestation by 80 percent in the Amazon and 40 percent in the Cerrado region, among other measures.
Some 700,000 hectares were deforested in 2010, the lowest figure since measurement began in 1988, said Azevedo.
Geologist Lúcia Ortiz, coordinator of the energy working group of the Brazilian Forum of Non-Governmental Organisations and Social Movements for the Environment and Development, believes the problem of climate change should not be addressed from a business opportunity perspective without challenging structural issues.
The low-carbon agricultural model proposed by the World Bank study “is a strategy for economic growth at the cost of the export of basic agricultural commodities,” she told Tierramérica. In her opinion, what is needed is an agro-ecological approach that encompasses aspects of development and mitigation of the effects of climate change, such as droughts, floods and plagues, rather than solely the control of carbon emissions.
For Azevedo, what is important to understand is that “if Brazil does not become an example and push the rest of the world to reduce their emissions, it will be significantly affected, in addition to not being able to benefit from the transition to a low-carbon economy.”
*This story was originally published by Latin American newspapers that are part of the Tierramérica network. Tierramérica is a specialised news service produced by IPS with the backing of the United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Environment Programme and the World Bank.
This story includes downloadable print-quality images -- Copyright IPS, to be used exclusively with this story.
IPS is an international communication institution with a global news agency at its core, raising the voices of the South
and civil society on issues of development, globalisation, human rights and the environment
Copyright © 2018 IPS-Inter Press Service. All rights reserved. - Terms & Conditions
You have the Power to Make a Difference
Would you consider a $20.00 contribution today that will help to keep the IPS news wire active? Your contribution will make a huge difference.