Active Citizens, Asia-Pacific, Civil Society, Development & Aid, Economy & Trade, Energy, Environment, Featured, Headlines, Human Rights, Natural Resources, Regional Categories

Nuclear Energy - Nuclear Weapons

Activists Score in Fight Against Nuclear Power

In Japan, anti-nuke protests draw tens of thousands of average citizens. Credit: Suvendrini Kakuchi/IPS

TOKYO, Aug 9 2012 (IPS) - A new wave of anti-nuclear protests in Japan this summer, sparked by the disastrous meltdown at a power plant last year, suggests that civil society is no longer willing to allow the government to take the lead in deciding the nation’s energy policy.

A clear example of the impact of grassroots activism was the decision on Aug. 3 by leading prosecutors, after months of deliberation, to accept criminal complaints against Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO), Japan’s largest utility corporation that operated the now-crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear reactor.

“The new move by prosecutors is a cornerstone in our long and hard fight to force TEPCO to face its criminal responsibility. It is an unprecedented achievement for civil organisations in Japan,” Hiromi Ebisuwa, a veteran activist in Fukushima who is leading the criminal complaint, told IPS.

The lives of tens of thousands of residents, including young children and infants, were drastically affected when they were forced to flee dangerous radiation exposure after the nuclear accident at Fukushima, which followed a massive earthquake and tsunami on Mar. 11 last year.

Since Jun 1,300 residents in Fukushima prefecture have filed complaints with the Fukushima District Public Prosecutor’s Officer. They have identified 33 people, including former executives at TEPCO and the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency, as culprits in the crisis, for failing to install anti-tsunami protections in the nuclear reactor.

The criminal complaints centre on negligence resulting in death or injury and the violation of the environmental pollution offense law.

Yet another example of the spreading anti-nuclear mood in Japan is a complaint filed against former senior Tokyo Electric Company (TEC) officials by a citizen’s group at the Kanazawa District Public Prosecutor’s office in Ishikawa prefecture.

TEC is debating re-opening its Shiga nuclear power plant in Ishikawa, located on the northwestern coast.

For Aileen Miyoko Smith, head of Green Action, a leading local environmental organisation, the latest developments in the anti-nuclear movement mark a critical juncture in Japan’s energy policy.

“The results of strenuous grassroots efforts after Fukushima, unprecedented in recent decades, are now (visible) in the Japanese political and social spheres,” she told IPS.

She, like other experts, believe the horror of the Fukushima accident, coupled with public outrage about the tragedy, contributed significantly to the temporary halt of operations in all of Japan’s 50 commercial reactors.

National energy security

Today, despite the summer heat, Japan is operating on less than three percent of its nuclear power, another major development for a country that has long touted nuclear energy as the lynchpin of its national economy.

Still, the coast is not clear for protestors. In July, despite continuous public opposition and demonstrations, the government, pointing to the need for secure energy supplies and with the consent of the cash-strapped local Oi government in western Japan, restarted two of the region’s four reactors.

Japan, the world’s third largest economy, currently imports 100 percent of its oil and coal supplies. Nuclear energy provides almost 30 percent of national needs, a figure that represents the country’s desire for energy self-sufficiency.

Indeed, the debate on prioritising between phasing out nuclear energy versus boosting economic growth is now a critical public issue—a July survey by the Japan Sustainable Institute showed that over 80 percent of those polled were against nuclear power.

However, more than 50 percent support a 2050 deadline for closing down all reactors, which illustrates the fact that concern over national energy supplies dilutes the urgency for immediate action and alternatives.

Still, breakthroughs by activists have been monumental.

The local government’s decision to re-start the Oi power plant in May was preceded by months of painful wrangling between national and local governments.

The final decision came only after the government pledged to promote higher safety levels under an independent nuclear regulatory authority that is now investigating the threat from a fault line found underneath the Oi reactors.

Now, leading intellectuals such as Nobel laureate Kenzaburo Oe and former prime minister Naoto Kan have joined the weekly protests.

As the movement gains steam, Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda was forced last week to issue a statement that he will meet the organisers of the weekly protests, a drastic change from his stance hithero, which, for many activists, was characterised by his comment, quoted in various local weeklies, that the demonstrations were simply “nosiy”.

For the past two months Misae Red Wolf has been a key organiser of the weekly anti-nuclear demonstrations that snake past government offices in Tokyo, sometimes drawing more than 100,000 people demanding the abolition of nuclear power.

Addressing a crowd in the searing summer heat, Misae demanded the immediate halt of operations in the two newly re-activated nuclear plants and the overall abolition of nuclear energy in Japan.

“Grassroots activism is the way forward. We have been waiting too long for a reliable answer from the government, which continues to ignore the voices of the people who have suffered too heavily from the nuclear accident,” she said.

Eiji Oguma, a prominent Japanese sociologist and professor at Keio University, describes the popular demonstrations as a sign of growing distrust of the country’s political and bureaucratic leadership following the Fukushima accident, and frustration at policies that do not reflect the will of the people.

“Dissatisfaction with politicians has accumulated over 20 years of economic stagnation. The Fukushima disaster and the decision to restart Oi has brought it to a critical point,” a July article in the prominent Asia Pacific Journal quoted him as saying.

The growing rift between politicians and their electorates led to the launch this July of the Green Party, which stands on an anti-nuclear platform and promotes welfare stability for the elderly.

Akira Miyabe, spokesperson for the Green Party, which will debut when it presents its candidates for next year’s Upper House elections on the proportional representation platform, explained to IPS, “The new political party represents a fresh start in Japan.”

“Green Party involvement in gathering criminal complaints against TEPCO for the Fukushima accident is aimed at changing the cozy ties between government and business that has been the (driving force) behind nuclear power in Japan,” he said.



Republish | | Print | |En español

  • sethdayal

    Good work on the prosecutions.

    If Tepco had been a Chinese company and Fukushima happened in China all executives would have already been executed and body parts harvested.

    Remember to look for links to the Yakuza as the pipeline funneling Big Oil bribes to Tepco and regulatory officials. Big Oil is making $100B a year in Japan now ,double that worldwide, as a result of this easily and obviously preventable accident – follow the money.

    Note the reactor at Onagawa despite being closer to the quake and hit with a larger tsunami suffered no damage. Hmm – wonder why? Don’t you?

    Were I Japanese, I would insist that IAEA supervise your regulator. Whistleblower protection must be granted to all nuclear employees.

    Good news is despite the worst accident possible to a nuclear power plant caused by corruption in an ancient 50’s designed plant and impossible in a modern nuke, the nuclear power industry worldwide kept its perfect record of not all soul killed in its entire history. With radiation levels outside the plant well under those recieved in a beach vacation in India and average levels far lower than downtown Denver, all damage from the accident is confined to the nuke plant itself.

    Nuke power is confirmed as the cleanest, safest and cheapest form of power there is.

    Good luck with the continuing effort to clean up the oily sheen over the land caused by the tens of thousands of tons of toxic asbestos and chemical pollution from all the Big Oil facilities in the Fukushima area.

    While you are understandably nervous about what bribes have been paid to keep other nuke facilities in harms way, remember that fossil fuel air pollution is now killing as many folks every year in Japan as the Tsunami did, and Big Oil is making Big bucks and it destroys your economy. Call the IAEA in and buck up!!!

    Note to Vancouver readers – this comment would be banned in the Georgia Straight.

  • Hartson Doak

    As a former quality control nuclear inspector, I have more knowledge and fear of these nukes that most people. The citizenry has every right to be afraid. These plants are operating decades past their design lives. They MUST be shut down and NEVER reopened again. This disaster is just going to be repeated unless the PEOPLE demand the closures.

  • Randy Robertson

    I’d pick Lunar power as the safest, cleanest and cheapest.The tides always move the water…and renewable, but no money in it for Big’s so cheap that it is not cost worthy to develop!!! Only when the oil runs out, we will have to develop it. Use the tides to split the water molecule into it’s elements, oxygen and hydrogen. Put the two together again by a spark and pure water is the bi-product. They do it with spacecraft!!!!!

  • sethdayal

    “…As a former quality control nuclear inspector..”

    There is no such thing. The lengths these Big Oil types will go….

  • sethdayal

    Only produces a tiny amount of power at enormous cost.

  • Pahl Dixon

    Oops I meant really, but rally is better!

principles of anatomy and physiology 15th edition