The biotech industry is using the increase in global hunger as a tool to win support for GM crops. Its tactics of "poor washing" (we must accept genetic engineering to increase production and improve livelihoods of farmers) and "green washing" (biotech is environmentally friendly and will help counter climate change) have won favor with the misguided philanthropic community as well.
The victory of Mauricio Funes, El Salvador's president elect and candidate of the Farabundo Marti Front for National Liberation (FMLN), completes a striking movement to the left in Latin American politics. The configuration of the continent had steadily shifted since the time the majority of countries emerged from military dictatorships and elected centrist or conservative governments. Today, with the exception of Mexico and Colombia on one side and Cuba on the other, the continent is governed by either the moderate left with social democratic leanings or by neo-populists. And then there is the Dominican Republic, which is governed by liberals with social concerns.
Crying out in opposition to war and nuclear weapons is neither emotionalism nor self-pity. It is the highest expression of human reason based on an unflinching commitment to the dignity of life.
Given the way the Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) negotiations have been based on the requirement for reciprocal market opening with the European Union (EU), they are likely to bring more losses than gains for Africa and make the path to development even more difficult than it already is. For this reason, the South Centre recommends an alternative approach.
Since its beginnings in the 1960s, Liberation Theology has adopted a global perspective, focusing on the conditions of the poor and oppressed throughout the world, victims of a system that thrives off the exploitation of labour and the plundering of nature. The system exploits the working class and the weakest nations. It also represses those who oppress and thus violate their own humanitarian impulses. In a word, everyone must be freed from this system that has continued for almost three centuries and has been imposed across the planet.
In today's global financial crisis, the question inevitably arises, Who will the new financiers be?
On November 23, 1963, I was just an eight-year-old boy. I remember that historic afternoon with a vividness that always startles me: I was on the patio of my house when a neighbour named Merida entered and announced jubilantly that they had killed that "son of a bitch" Kennedy.
Today we are experiencing the worst economic recession since World War II. No country is immune. Trade is shrinking, growth is declining, and unemployment is on the rise.
Countries at all levels of economic development are concerned about the impact of the financial crisis on health. If unemployment continues to rise, safety nets for social protection fail, savings and pension funds erode, and public spending drops, it is inevitable that people's health will suffer.
While few question that ecological agriculture is environmentally and socially desirable, there are fears that it is insufficiently productive. This is not the case. Recent studies show that yields from ecological agriculture are broadly comparable to conventional yields in developed countries and significantly higher in developing countries, particularly where the existing system is low-input, which is largely the case for Africa.
The economic crisis engulfing the world is getting worse day by day and has spread to every continent. It is a truly global crisis the solution to which is clear to no one. During the years of hope in the "glorious decades" following World War II, the communists never tired of proclaiming the impending general crisis of capitalism, which would be fatal for the system, according to Marxist analysts. Although there were small crises, none was comparable to the depression of 1929, which seems the ultimate measure of failure.
The media gave ample coverage to the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland, attended since its beginning in 1971 by the same politicians and businessmen who have sustained for decades that financial capitalism was progressing towards a certain and every more generous prosperity and who now promise that they will revive it without offering any plausible explanation for the current catastrophic recession.
Belen is one of the cities with the least green space in Brazil, despite the fact that it is the gateway to the Amazon, which contains one third of the planet's tropical forest. The largest of these green areas are located on the campus of the two federal universities that hosted the week-long ninth World Social Forum, which concluded on February 1.
In May 1932, with the United States and Europe mired in a devastating depression, then-presidential candidate Franklin Roosevelt counselled his countrymen not to cower in fear but to rekindle the animating myth of "the American experiment": "The country needs and demands bold, persistent experimentation. It is common sense to take a method and try it; if it fails, admit it frankly and try another. But above all, try something."
Innovation in the global marketplace is the very heartbeat of knowledge-based economies. It encompasses both the invention of products and processes and their sale and distribution, which stimulates economic growth. It involves the creation, exchange, and evolution of new ideas and their application for the success of an organisation, the vitality of a nation's economy, and the advancement of society as a whole. If we are to solve the current financial crisis, what is needed is more, not less, innovation.
In office only since January 20, US President Barack Obama has jumped into action so quickly he has not given adversaries or observers the time to organise criticism or attacks. Meanwhile Europeans, and in particular their political leaders, do not seem to have grasped the "Copernican revolution" that is underway in the US and appear stunned and incapable of reacting to the new developments that are taking place each day in Washington.
In office only since January 20, US President Barack Obama has jumped into action so quickly he has not given adversaries or observers the time to organise criticism or attacks. Meanwhile Europeans, and in particular their political leaders, do not seem to have grasped the "Copernican revolution" that is underway in the US and appear stunned and incapable of reacting to the new developments that are taking place each day in Washington.
As the US recession drags Asia down, there has been much speculation about a regional response to the crisis. Seemingly lending substance to this have been a trilateral summit of the leaders of China, Japan, and South Korea last December and a flurry of bilateral talks between Japan's Taro Aso and Korea's Lee Myung-bak, all of which had economic cooperation at the top of the agenda.
The global response to the election of Barack Obama is widely accepted as signalling the desire, at home and abroad, for a new era in US foreign policy. But as he prepares to take office on 20 January, hope alone is not enough and the question remains as to how President Obama will meet the huge expectations of him. In a poll commissioned by the British Council, we found that nearly two-thirds of Americans were worried about the US's standing abroad, over 8 out of 10 thought it was important for the US to build better relationships with other countries and 79% said that improving the country's reputation and understanding abroad should be a major priority for the new government. When asked what the biggest threat is facing the world today, two-thirds said the global economic situation. Just over half saw terrorism as the second biggest threat, with cultural and religious intolerance being voted the main cause of conflict and instability in the world. ItÂ's perhaps not surprising that Americans rank the economy as their biggest worry at the moment, but it is also clear that they'd like to see more than just financial solutions and domestic programmes from their new president. Obama must act to seize the opportunity at home and capitalise on goodwill internationally to restore America's standing on the world stage. During campaigning, President Obama pledged to "renew American diplomacy to meet the challenges of the 21st centuryÂ... rebuild our alliancesÂ...meet with all nations, friend and foe, to advance American interests", but also admitted that "resources for cultural diplomacy are at their lowest level in a decade." In my view, the answer to rebuilding these alliances lies precisely in Barack Obama embracing cultural diplomacy, or what we call cultural relations, as an invaluable instrument in his foreign policy toolbox and re-invigorating the resources depleted over the last decade. The United States Information Agency, which for almost half a century ran cultural and educational exchanges among other things, closed in 1999 when it was folded into the State Department. Republican presidential candidate, John McCain, called for its resurrection during his election campaign. And last month the American think-tank, the Brookings Institution, recommended the creation in the US of a new public diplomacy body. But restoring trust and understanding in the US overseas won't be a quick fix. President Obama needs the courage and staying-power to invest heavily in the long-term business of cultural relations, if he's to rebuild lasting relations with other countries on a mutually beneficial and respectful footing. Cultural relations is not about business, not about governments, not about institutions, it's about people. Cultural relations fosters the cooperation that contributes to a safer, more prosperous world. It encourages co-existence by promoting trust, building understanding, and allowing people to explore what they have in common as well as their differences. This two-way sharing of knowledge, ideas, creativity, skills and expertise transforms lives. By broadening horizons and giving people opportunities to engage internationally, it benefits all countries. But for cultural relations to work there needs to be a clear distance between the organisations charged with this activity and the government of the day; it is not about direct messaging of the views of one or other government. Cultural relations is only effective when it is undertaken in partnership with others and informed by mutual respect for other cultures. Cultural relations is different from other areas of public diplomacy because it is built over, and for, the long term. In 2009 the British Council enters its 75th year, we currently link 900 schools in the UK and overseas as part of our global school linking programme; we help generate over £8 billion for the UK economy promoting educational opportunities to prospective students abroad; we serve over 350,000 English students through our teaching centres and in India alone are training 750,000 English language teachers; we hosted the first foreign arts exhibition in Tehran after the revolution and are currently showing the largest-ever Turner exhibition in Russia; and we work with the Premier League to build the leadership and English language skills of young people overseas through football. But we are not unique. Other countries have similar organisations and we encourage, work with and support them. The world needs more cultural relations. This is President Obama's opportunity. (END/COPYRIGHT IPS) (*) Martin Davidson is chief executive of the British Council, the UK's international cultural relations organisation.
To justify itself, state terrorism creates terrorists: it sows hatred and harvests alibis. Everything indicates that this bloodbath in Gaza, which its creators claim was designed to eliminate terrorists, will result in a proliferation of them.
There. A US official has finally said it. Susan Crawford, convening authority for the military commissions at Guantanamo, has admitted what Mohamed al-Qahtani, his lawyers and human rights groups have long said. Al-Qahtani, a Saudi Arabian man held in Guantanamo since 2002, was tortured there.