Active Citizens, Civil Society, Energy, Environment, Featured, Food & Agriculture, Headlines, Health, Indigenous Rights, Natural Resources, North America, Nuclear Energy - Nuclear Weapons, TerraViva Europe, Water & Sanitation

Yakama Nation Tells DOE to Clean Up Nuclear Waste

At the perimetre of Hanford Nuclear Reservation in Washington State. Credit: Jason E. Kaplan/IPS

At the perimetre of Hanford Nuclear Reservation in Washington State. Credit: Jason E. Kaplan/IPS

YAKAMA NATION, Washington State, U.S. , Apr 14 2014 (IPS) - The Department of Energy (DOE), politicians and CEOs were discussing how to warn generations 125,000 years in the future about the radioactive waste at Hanford Nuclear Reservation, considered the most polluted site in the U.S., when Native American anti-nuclear activist Russell Jim interrupted their musings: “We’ll tell them.”

He tells IPS “they looked around and saw me. I said, ‘We’ve been here since the beginning of time, so we will be here then.’ That was when they knew they’d have a fight on their hands.”

“Helen Caldicott told us in 1997 that if we eat fish from the Columbia, we’ll die." -- Yakama Elder Russell Jim

With his long braids, the 78-year-old director of the Environmental Restoration & Waste Management Programme (ERWM) for the Yakama tribes cuts a striking figure, sitting calmly in his office located on the arid lands of his sovereign nation.

The Yakama Reservation in southeast Washington has 1.2 million acres with 10,000 federally recognised tribal members and an estimated 12,000 feral horses roaming the desert steppe. Down from the 12 million acres ceded by force to the U.S. government in 1855, it is just 20 miles west from the Hanford nuclear site.

Though the nuclear arms race ended in 1989, radioactive waste is the legacy of the various sites of the former Manhattan Project spread across the U.S.

While the Yakama have successfully protected their sacred fishing grounds from becoming a repository for nuclear waste from other project sites by invoking the treaty of 1855 which promises access to their “usual and accustomed places,” Hanford is far from clean, though the DOE promised to restore the land.

“The DOE is trying to reclassify the waste as ‘low activity.’ They are trying to leave it here and bury it in shallow pits. Scientists are saying that it needs to be buried deep under the ground,” Jim explains.

Tom Carpenter of Hanford Challenge watchdog group tells IPS “it is a battle for Washington State and the tribes to get the feds to keep their promise to remove the waste. There are 42 miles of trenches that are 15 feet wide and 20 feet deep full of boxes, crates and vials of waste in unlined trenches.”

There are a further 177 underground tanks of radioactive waste and six are leaking. Waste is supposed to be moved within 24 hours from leak detection or whenever is “practicable” but the contractors say there is not enough space.

Three whistleblowers working on the cleanup raised concerns and were fired. Closely followed by a local news station, it is an issue that is largely neglected by mainstream media and the Yakama’s fight seems all but ignored.

“We used to have a media person on staff but the DOE says there is no need as ‘everything is going fine,” says Russell Jim. His department lost 80 percent of its funding in 2012 after cutbacks. His tribe doesn’t fund ERWM, the DOE does. “The DOE crapped it up, so they should pay for it.”

Russell Jim, Yakama Elder and Director of Environmental Restoration & Waste Management Program (ERWM) for the Yakama Nation. Credit: Jason E. Kaplan/IPS

Russell Jim, Yakama Elder and Director of Environmental Restoration & Waste Management Program (ERWM) for the Yakama Nation. Credit: Jason E. Kaplan/IPS

But everything is not fine. With radioactive groundwater plumes making their way toward the river, the Yakama and watchdog groups says it is an emergency. Some plumes are just 400 yards from the river where the tribe accesses Hanford Reach monument, according to treaty rights.

Hanford Reach nature reserve, a buffer zone for the site, is the Columbia’s largest spawning grounds for wild fall Chinook salmon

Washington State reports highly toxic radioactive contamination from uranium, strontium 90 and chromium in the ground water has already entered the Columbia River.

“There are about 150 groundwater ‘upwellings’ in the gravel of the Columbia River coming from Hanford that young salmon swim around,” explains Russell Jim.

“Helen Caldicott [founder of Physicians for Social Responsibility] told us in 1997 that if we eat fish from the Columbia, we’ll die,” he adds.

Callie Ridolfi, environmental consultant to the Yakama, tells IPS their diet of 150 to 519 grammes of fish a day, nearly double regional tribal averages and far greater than the mainstream population, puts them at greater risk, with as much as a one in 50 chance of getting cancer from eating resident fish.

Migratory fish like salmon that live in the ocean most of their lives are less affected, unlike resident fish.

According to a 2002 EPA study on fish contaminants, resident sturgeon and white fish from Hanford Reach had some of the highest levels of PCBs.

Last year, Washington and Oregon states released an advisory for the 150-mile heavily dammed stretch of the Columbia from Bonneville to McNary Dam to limit eating resident fish to once a week due to PCB toxins.

Fisheries manager at Mike Matylewich at Columbia River Inter Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC), says, “Lubricants containing PCBs were used for years, particularly in transformers, at hydroelectric dams because of the ability to withstand high temperatures.

“The ability to withstand high temperatures contributes to their persistence in the environment as a legacy contaminant,” he tells IPS.

While the advisory does not include the Hanford Reach, the longest undammed stretch of the Columbia, Russell Jim doubts it’s safe.

“The DOE tells congress the river corridor is clean. It’s not clean but they are afraid of damages being filed against them.” A cancer survivor, Jim’s tribe received no compensation for damages from radioactive releases from 1944 to 1971 into the Columbia as high as 6,300,000 curies of Neptunium-239.

Steven G. Gilbert, a toxicologist with Physicians for Social Responsbility, tells IPS there is a lack transparency and data on the Hanford cleanup. “It is a huge problem,” he says, adding that contaminated groundwater at Hanford still interacts with the Columbia River, based on water levels.

Though eight of the nine nuclear reactors next to the river were decommissioned, the 1,175-megawatt Energy Northwest Energy power plant is still functioning

“Many people don’t know there is a live nuclear reactor on the Columbia. It’s the same style as Fukushima,” Gilbert explains.

In the middle of the fight are the tribes, which are sovereign nations. Russell Jim says they are often erroneously described as “stakeholders” when they are separate governments.

“We were the only tribe to take on the nuclear issue and testify at the 1980 Senate subcommittee. In 1982 we immediately filed for affected tribe status. The Umatilla and the Nez Perce tribes later joined.”

Yucca Mountain was earmarked by congress as a nuclear storage repository for Hanford and other sites’ waste but the plan was struck down by the president. Southern Paiute and Western Shoshone in the region filed for affected status.

The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) in New Mexico was slated to take waste from Hanford but after a fire in February, the site is taking no more waste. The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists has expressed concern about the lack of storage options.

The U.S. has the largest stockpile of spent nuclear fuel globally – five times that of Russia.

“The best material to store waste in is granite and the northeast U.S. has a lot of granite. An ideal site was just 30 miles from the capital, but that is out,” says Russell Jim with a wry smile, considering its proximity to the White House.

He does not plan to give up. “We are the only people here who can’t pick up and move on.”

 
Republish | | Print |

  • Kapundaboy

    It seems everywhere you read about the Native peoples of all countries (who knew how to look after the land ) they are always getting screwed by their Governments. They either have to cop plenty of contamination issues or dispossession of their Lands and many suffer poverty. All they can do is Protest and make a major nuisance or sue through the Courts, if they are able to seek compensation and restitution of the areas effected…. It’s indeed strange how the so called uneducated Native peoples treated the Land, water and air with reverance and respect whilst the so called educated people who came later have despoiled and treated the land, air, rivers and Oceans as a garbage dump. …. Past wrongs must be made right by all Governments of all Native peoples. My own country Australia has been moving done this path for years, but there is still much to try to make amends for…. There are some things that can never be forgotten, but we must try to reconcile them to history and live together. Our own Nuclear Bomb tests caused illness and the deaths of many Aboriginals and contaminated the land for decades.. ….. Is it any wonder that many Native peoples suffer from depressive illness, Alcoholism and low self esteem. If the shoe were on the other foot and we had been treated so badly, I dare say we would be in a similar position. I have to admit to being ashamed of what was done by our Government to our Aboiginal peoples for two hundred years. The USA Federal Government should be ashamed fro dragging the chain for so long, they need to wake up and get their act together for the Native peoples of their Land.. They have been treated as second class citizens for too long……………………john from kapunda, Australia

  • EnviroEngineer

    While I do not dispute the validity of claims to ancestral land by the Yakama Nation and other first nations, this article is confused. First, the specter of spent nuclear fuel is brought up at the end, yet this has nothing to do with the Hanford Reservation or the wastes disposed there. Another curious item is the mention of neptunium-239, ostensibly a threat to piscivores (those who eat fish). The thing is, the half-life of Np-239 is only a couple of days, so any Np-239 released or measured at one time is long gone. So, bringing this up is only a red herring, perhaps intended to alarm naive readers. The PCB issue, while serious, is wrongly brought up in the context of Hanford. The PCBs arise from releases from transformers used in the industry of electrical power production–again nothing to do with Hanford. What is sad is that such a scattered and misinformed article tends to actually undermine the cause of cleaning up and returning the land to its ancestral owners. With such carelessness, the author makes a mockery of a legitimate concern.

  • Michelle Tolson

    Hanford Challenge reported in 2013 that 100,000 metric tons of spent fuel was generated at Hanford, of which 2,000 tons remain. There were nine nuclear reactors on Hanford. Eight are now decommissioned but one remains working.

    The stretch of dams along the Columbia is indeed contributing to the current advisory on PCBs (the advisory is linked and CRITFC explains this). However, PCBs were also generated at Hanford during its production phase and while production ended in 1989, this likely contributed to the contamination reported by the EPA in 2002.

    Radioactive and nonradioactive waste produced during Hanford’s production phase, some of which was released into the air, water and soil before the impacts were understood (the links explain this in greater detail) while other contaminants were stored.

  • Alex Adams

    Too bad that those who know technical details mostly have to keep quiet for fear of employment problems. Hanford is indeed a toxic craphole, mismanaged by the gov’t nuke lovers in DOE. Nuclear must be held accountable for its discharges and waste issues, not allowed to just pass them off the page in their scope of work. Ah, but that would make it prohibitively expensive. Right, so who do they think should bear that onus?

X
NEXT STOP SDGS
  • Tracking global progress towards a sustainable world

Weekly Newsletter