Armed Conflicts, Crime & Justice, Editors' Choice, Featured, Global Geopolitics, Headlines, Human Rights, Humanitarian Emergencies, Middle East & North Africa, Migration & Refugees, TerraViva United Nations | Analysis

Armed Conflicts

Hamas Rocket Launches Don’t Explain Israel’s Gaza Destruction

Palestinians collect their belongings from under the rubble of a residential tower, which witnesses said was destroyed by an Israeli air strike in Gaza City on Aug. 24. Credit: UN Photo/Shareef Sarhan

WASHINGTON, Sep 9 2014 (IPS) - Israel and its supporters abroad have parried accusations of indiscriminate destruction and mass killing of civilians in Gaza by arguing that they were consequences of strikes aimed at protecting Israeli civilians from rockets that were being launched from very near civilian structures.

That defence has already found its way into domestic U.S. politics. A possible contender for the Democratic nomination for president, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, defended her vote for more military aid for Israel during the Israeli assault on Gaza by citing the rocket launch defence.

The IDF obviously did not have actual intelligence on each of those homes that had been reduced to rubble. The massive designation of houses as “hideouts” indicates the Israelis believed Palestinian fighters were hiding in some of them.

“[W]hen Hamas puts its rocket launchers next to hospitals, next to schools, they’re using their civilian population to protect their military assets,” said Warren. “And I believe Israel has a right, at that point, to defend itself.”

But although some Hamas rockets were launched near homes or other civilian structures, military developments on both sides have rendered that defence of Israeli attacks on civilian targets invalid.

The rocket launchers for Hamas’s homemade Qassam missiles consist of simple tripods that can be removed in seconds, and the extensive Hamas tunnel network has given it underground launching sites as well as storage facilities for its larger, longer-range Grad and M-75 missiles.

On the other side, the Israeli Air Force possesses air-to-ground missiles that are so accurate that they can destroy a very small target without any damage to civilian structure even if it is very close.

A video released by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) in a report on Hamas’s “illegal use of civilian infrastructure” last month shows an attack – obviously by an Israeli drone — on an underground rocket launcher only a few metres away from a mosque causing no damage whatever to the mosque.

These technological changes take away any justification for flattening civilian buildings even if a rocket launch site is nearby. In fact, however, the evidence now available indicates that Hamas launch sites are not that close to hospitals, schools and mosques.

The IDF sought in mid-July to use the rocket launcher defence to explain the damage to Al Wafa Rehabilitation and Geriatic Hospital in eastern Gaza City from 15 rockets, which forced the staff to evacuate its patients. An IDF spokesman said the military had “no choice” because rockets had been launched from very near the hospital.

Clearly revealing that the rocket launch justification for the attack was a ruse, however, the spokesman revealed to Allison Degler of Mondoweiss that the alleged launch site was 100 metres from the hospital. That would have been far more space than was needed to strike the launch site without any damage to the hospital whatever.

A report released by the IDF Aug. 19 included an aerial view of Al Wafa Hospital with two alleged rocket launching sites marked at locations that appeared to be much farther from the hospital than the 100 metres claimed by the IDF spokesman.

The IDF nevertheless went so far as to declare on Jul. 21, “Hamas fires rockets from Wafa hospital in the Gaza neighborhood of Shujaiya.”

When the IDF destroyed Al Wafa hospital completely by airstrikes on Jul. 23, it abandoned the pretense that the reason was a Hamas rocket launch site. Instead it released a video purporting to show firing at IDF troops from the hospital.

It turned out, however, the video clips of the firing been shot during “Operation Cast Lead” in 2009, not in 2014.

The IDF has continued to suggest that its destruction of public civilian facilities was forced on it by rocket launches from within those facilities. At the end of the “Operation Protective Edge” the IDF spokesman’s office claimed that 597 rockets had been launched from civilian facilities, of which 160 were allegedly fired from schools, 50 from hospitals, and 160 from mosques.

But those figures were by produced only by pretending that launching sites some distance from the facilities in question were on the premises of the facilities.

An IDF “declassified report” released Aug. 19, aimed at showing that civilian facilities were serving as military infrastructure for Hamas, includes no evidence of any rocket launches on the grounds of any civilian facility.

A very blurry 20-second video appears to show a rocket launch from what is identified as “Abu Nur” school. But it, too, is deceptive. A black streak rises from the area of the school for a little more than a second of the video, but for the entire length of the video two voices declare repeatedly that they saw three rockets launched “from within the school”.

Careful viewing of the footage reveals, however, that the apparent launch comes from outside the wall of the three-story school building rather than from within it.

In three other cases of alleged rocket launches from schools, the IDF provides no visual evidence – only large red dots drawn on an aerial view of the schools.

During the “Operation Protective Edge”, the IDF openly targeted mosques, claiming they are military targets, demolishing 73 mosques and partially destroying 205 more.

The Aug. 19 IDF report refers to a “rocket cache and gathering point for militants hidden in a mosque” in Nuseirat. But despite frequent repetitions of the notion that Hamas routinely stores rockets in mosques, the IDF has not produced photographic evidence of rocket storage in a single mosque.

Nor has the IDF made public any video evidence of secondary explosions from the destruction of mosques. In a tacit admission that such evidence is lacking, the report instead cites an instance of a “concealed entrance” to a Hamas tunnel located between a mosque and a school.

The most extensive destruction of civilian structures in “Operation Protective Edge” was the complete leveling of large parts of entire neighbourhoods in the Shujaiya district of Gaza City on Jul. 19. After the United Nations published a map showing the complete destruction of those areas of Shujaiya, the IDF published its own map on Aug. 4 aimed at justifying the destruction.

The map shows that the IDF can’t claim the proximity of Hamas rocket launching sites as the justification for the leveling of many residential blocks in Shujaiya. The Israeli military had identified every home in the devastated neighbourhoods on its map as a “hideout” for Hamas or Islamic Jihad fighters.

The IDF obviously did not have actual intelligence on each of those homes that had been reduced to rubble. The massive designation of houses as “hideouts” indicates the Israelis believed Palestinian fighters were hiding in some of them.

Although the red dots on the IDF map identifying rocket launch sites are too big to estimate accurately the distance between them and the closest houses, only a few such dots appear to be as close as one city block to a house in one of the areas of massive destruction. And all but a few of the homes destroyed are much farther than a block from the alleged launching sites.

An account of the Shujaiya destruction by journalist Mark Perry based on a Jul. 21 U.S. Defence Department report recalls that the IDF fired 7,000 artillery shells at residential areas in the district the night of Jul. 19, including 4,500 shells in the space of just seven hours.

Such massive and indiscriminate destruction of civilian structures is strictly prohibited by the international laws of war. Israeli officials have frequently said the purpose of IDF military operations in both Lebanon and Gaza was to “deter” their adversaries in the future by imposing heavy costs on the civilian population.

Gareth Porter is an independent investigative journalist and winner of the 2012 Gellhorn Prize for journalism. He is the author of the newly published Manufactured Crisis: The Untold Story of the Iran Nuclear Scare. He can be contacted at

Edited by: Kitty Stapp

Republish | | Print | |En español


    Mr Porter, how naive can one want to be? If you only hit launchers what would exactly deter Hamas from continuing it, probably forever, until they last launcher is gone.

  • Gareth Porter

    So you agree that what Israel is doing is hitting civilian structures (like Al Wafa hospital and the residential blocks in Shujaiya)
    in order to “deter” Hamas and its supporters. That’s what the “Dahiya Doctrine” is all about, isn’t it?

  • originalone

    Mr Porter, thanks for your insight. As for anyone who questions your points about the IDF action[s], you must realize that they are pro-IDF, so no matter how much you engage with their posts, you won’t change their minds. That said, what happened there, was just another “Turkey Shoot in the barrel”, as it may be. I might add, if Hamas had those Russian built anti-aircraft missals that Syria is supposed to have, then the results may have been quite different. I’m sure also, that some may take issue with my comment, so if that be the case, then we’re both in good company together.

  • chalkie

    As you saw it…don’t expect a make believe Jew to agree. Not even with Jesus!

  • Mark Renton

    I also want to add further on language like “reduced to rubble” and “indiscriminate” etc all buzzwords. PORTAR – Gaza is one big military base. And not only that, but with Walmart-sized buildings full of explosive materials – all located next to civilians.

    Gaza is so combustible, the Israeli’s don’t even use exposliive munitions in many cases. Their JDAM-kit bombs are often filled with sand and water (wet bombs) because their targets are already incredibly explosive.

    Portar also does not acknowledge the detonation of IEDs in civilian areas to trap and disrupt approaching Israeli infantry, as well as to create obstacles….all of that is somehow blamed on Israeli.

    Hamas is responsible for any and all damage in Gaza. The Israeli’s operate at a higher level then we do. Gazans are lucky the Israelis aren’t American or British or it would it have indeed been a massacre.

  • Mark Renton

    Gareth, the “Dahiya Doctrine” was never applied in Gaza. And Shujaiya was one big Hamas military base with hundreds – perhaps thousands of fighters – along with numerous sniper nests, miles of underground tunnels, basements full of ANFO, IEDs, etc.

    You posts serious ignorance of Hamas’ offensive and defensive capabilities. Hamas detonates explosives in their own neighborhoods, indeed they detonated hundreds of munitions in Shujaiya. They also prevented civilians from fleeing during these operations, hoping to trap them between approaching Israeli infantry.

    REMEMBER, in the run-up to the IDF’s operations in Shujaiya….the Israeli’s gave Hamas and IJ FOUR DAYS notice. And the Israeli’s did not use artillery in Shujaiya until after they took fire from a massive barrage of mortars and rockets from within the city:

    Most shells used were inert. We know this because Israeli troops were 200-250 ft away from their targets. An explosive shell (say, BU20) has a kill radius of nearly 550 ft.

    So when you cite journalists that say things like “over 7000 shells fired in x hours” like we’re supposed to be offended or something, you look less of a journalist and more like a stenographer for a terrorist organisation.

    Maybe read a book on asymmetrical warfare and Hamas’ capabilities before inserting your arrogant “journalism” on this salient topic. I don’t care how many awards you’ve won

even if it hurts book