- Development & Aid
- Economy & Trade
- Human Rights
- Global Governance
- Civil Society
Tuesday, October 20, 2020
DOHA, Sep 5 2013 - World leaders from G20 are meeting in St Petersburg, Russia, amid sharp differences over possible U.S. military action against Syria in response to what the U.S. administration calls a deadly chemical weapons attack by the Syrian government.
Thursday’s summit comes hours after a U.S. Senate panel voted to give President Barack Obama authority to use military force against Syria – the first time lawmakers in that country have voted to allow military action since the October 2002 vote authorising the invasion of Iraq.
The U.S. and Russia, which is a key Syrian ally, remain at odds as Obama has tried to build his case for military action. The U.S. president has vowed to continue to try to persuade his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, of the need for punitive strikes against President Bashar al-Assad for allegedly using chemical weapons, when the two meet in St Petersburg.
As Putin opened the summit, he spoke exclusively about the global economic crisis, which forms the primary agenda of the summit, stressing the need for coordinated international policy-making in order to combat continuing volatility in economic markets.
He suggested that world leaders discuss the subject of Syria “during dinner” on Thursday night, so as not to take away from the summit’s primary economic agenda.
Kerry ‘a liar’
Earlier, Putin had again questioned Western evidence justifying a military strike against Syria, accusing U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry outright of lying when, in urging Congress to approve strikes, he played down the role of al-Qaeda in the rebel forces.
“Al-Qaeda units are the main military echelon, and they know this,” Putin said. “He is lying and knows he is lying. It’s sad.”
Putin said U.S. congressional approval without a U.N. Security Council resolution would be an act of aggression. He also told The Associated Press this week that he “does not exclude” supporting U.N. action – if it is proven that the Syrian government used poison gas on its own people.
Obama had previously stated that he was prepared to bypass the U.N. Security Council on the issue. But he put the matter to a Congressional vote. Members of the full U.S. Senate are due to debate the matter next week.
The conflict in Syria, which began with a popular uprising in March 2011, has been stalemated, and it is not clear if U.S. military strikes over the government’s alleged chemical weapons use would change that. Obama has said he seeks limited pinpoint action to deter future chemical attacks, not regime change.
Economic and nuclear risks
Meanwhile, China has warned other world powers of global economic risks following the potential U.S. strikes on Syria.
Speaking in St Petersburg ahead of the G20 summit on Thursday, Chinese Vice Finance Minister Zhu Guangyao said such “military action would definitely have a negative impact on the global economy, especially on the oil price”.
He cited estimates that a 10 dollar rise in oil prices could push down global growth by 0.25 percent.
He urged a negotiated U.N. solution to the standoff over allegations that Syria’s government used chemical weapons against its own people, expressing hope that “the world economic balance will become more stable rather than more complex and more challenging.”
Russia has also issued a warning that U.S. strikes on Syria’s atomic facilities might result in a nuclear catastrophe and is urging the U.N. to present a risk analysis of such a scenario. The issue will be brought up at a meeting of the 35-nation IAEA board next week, the Interfax news agency reported.
Little international support
Obama has been lobbying for international and domestic support for punishing Assad’s regime, which the U.S. says fired rockets loaded with the nerve agent sarin on rebel-held areas near Damascus before dawn on Aug. 21, killing hundreds of civilians.
So far, however, he has won little international backing for action. The U.S. has France’s support for military action in Syria. But several other G20 powers, including China and Germany, have firmly voiced their opposition.
Ben Rhodes, a senior Obama national security aide, said that the U.S. would use the summit in St Petersburg to “explain our current thinking” to allies and partners and explore what type of “political and diplomatic support they may express for our efforts to hold Syrian regime accountable”.
With pressure mounting on the G20 to make a decision regarding the conflict, the U.N. announced on Thursday that Lakhdar Brahimi, its special envoy to Syria, was travelling to St Petersburg to make a push for peace talks.
Published under an agreement with Al Jazeera.
IPS is an international communication institution with a global news agency at its core,
raising the voices of the South
and civil society on issues of development, globalisation, human rights and the environment
Copyright © 2020 IPS-Inter Press Service. All rights reserved. - Terms & Conditions
You have the Power to Make a Difference
Would you consider a $20.00 contribution today that will help to keep the IPS news wire active? Your contribution will make a huge difference.