Africa, Cooperatives, Featured, Food and Agriculture, Gender, Headlines, Poverty & SDGs, Projects, TerraViva United Nations, Women & Economy

Food and Agriculture

Women Small-Holder Farmers, Key Drivers for Sustainable Production

Through the Productive Assets Creation Programme (PAC), WFP in Zimbabwe supported 95,000 people in 2016 through the rehabilitation or creation of community assets, such as water harvesting systems. Photo courtesy of WFP.

Through the Productive Assets Creation Programme (PAC), WFP in Zimbabwe supported 95,000 people in 2016 through the rehabilitation or creation of community assets, such as water harvesting systems. Photo courtesy of WFP.

HARARE, Jun 5 2017 (IPS) - The shouts can be heard from a distance as one approaches Domboshawa, 30 kilometres northeast of the Zimbabwean capital, Harare.

Tokupai madomasi! Tokupai mbambaira! Do you want tomatoes or sweet potatoes? Mune marii? How much do you have? Scores of women and children carrying bundles of vegetables, sacks of sweet potatoes and containers full of farming produce shout above the din of moving vehicles, trying to sell their produce for a meagre profit.

"Households and communities have been engaged to promote non–oppressive practices, recognising the importance of role sharing.” --Ali Said Yesuf, FAO Chief Technical Advisor

Tsitsi Machingauta, 32, has a two-hectare farm in the area. She decries the numerous problems faced by smallholder farmers, which range from produce rotting in the fields due to the heavy downpours the country experienced this year, to a poor road network that restricts their access to markets.

“Even when supermarket chains come to buy our produce, they pay very little because we do not have the bargaining power. Because of the poor returns, we struggle to make a living, let alone to send our children to school,” Machingauta told IPS.

Machingauta, who is the founder and director of Women’s Farming Syndicate, an organization that supports women smallholder farmers in Domboshaw), explains how the lack of skills to make use of technology and limited time for training for women – compounded by climate change – has worsened the plight of women in the area.

According to the Ministry of Women’s Affairs, Gender and Community Development (MWAGCD), in Zimbabwe, women make up 70 percent of the rural population and 86 percent of women are involved in farming. Of the smallholder farmers who benefited from the government’s land reform program, only 18 percent are female; for commercial land, women constitute just 12 percent.

A study by the Zimbabwe National Chamber of Commerce (2016) on Women Agribusiness Entrepreneurs revealed that fewer women smallholder farmers meet the banking sector’s stringent borrowing requirements, and women are more likely to operate informally.

According to the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) report on Small Holders and Family Farmers, if women farmers had the same access to productive resources as men, they could increase yields on their farms by 20-30 percent, lifting 100-150 million people out of hunger.

Ali Said Yesuf, FAO Chief Technical Advisor, told IPS that in an effort to address these challenges, the United Kingdom’s Department for International Development (DFID) funded 72 million dollars to implement the Livelihood and Food Security Program (LFSP) to increase agricultural productivity and incomes, improve food and nutrition security, and reduce poverty in rural Zimbabwe.

“LFSP will actively address the specific constraints that smallholder farmers, particularly women, face in raising the productivity of their farms and participating in markets,” says Yesuf. The project covers eight districts in Zimbabwe.

The interventions take into account time constraints, which are as a result of women’s numerous domestic responsibilities. The LFSP promotes labour-saving technologies such as mechanised conservation agriculture, mechanised groundnut shellers, mechanised water abstraction technologies and more efficient wood stoves.

Yesuf said extension services and trainings have been carried out close to homes to avoid disruptions of women’s routines.

“Value chains such as poultry – broilers and indigenous chickens – and groundnuts that are perceived to be dominated by women are also given preference.  This allows women to have some control over incomes that are derived,” Yesuf told IPS.

He said the LFSP would also ensure the following:

  • Women’s participation in decision-making, i.e. membership on committees such as Rural District Councils (RDCs), Internal Savings And Lending (ISALs), commodity associations, lead farmers
  • Household decision-making by working with women and men to integrate gender relations within the household
  • Increasing women’s knowledge about markets

The LFSP has employed the Gender Action Learning Systems (GALS) approach which provides safe spaces for communities to integrate decision-making and power relations.

“Through this, households and communities have been engaged to promote non–oppressive practices, recognising the importance of role sharing,” Yesuf told IPS.

As women are known for good saving practices, the LFSP has enhanced and built on such initiatives through the Internal Savings and Lending (ISALs) through training and capacity development and introduction of income-generating activities.

Women in the Midlands Province have transformed their lives through the Extension and Training for Rural Agriculture (EXTRA) project, a three-year project under LFSP. Vavariro ISALs in the Midlands Province is one such group whose members’ lives have been transformed.

“We started by contributing small amounts of money – as little as three dollars per person,” said Virginia Gomana, a Vavariro group member.

“Now we have ventured into big projects that we never thought we could do, such as goat rearing and market gardening, and this has enabled us to own our own homes. Vavariro has also become a platform where we are able exchange ideas, strengthen our skills,” she said.

Yesuf said that financial institutions have also been tapped to better support the needs of these women.

“Women are accessing loans from Micro-Finance Institutions (MFI) through the group methodology where there is group collateral and guarantorship,” he said.

Republish | | Print | |En español

  • wordscanhelp

    These are better programmes for Africa in the long-term than the slick commodity agriculture ‘partnerships’ with foreign companies that are being touted as the ‘solution’ for Africa’s economic problems. All they will do is put more and more female smallholders off their lands, at risk of being adrift in cities and vulnerable to trafficking and prostitution, having little education or urban skills. The big fancy programmes are liked by the elites because they are an opportunity to siphon off some of the money in off shoot and off shore companies that are used for laundering. This grassroots development is healthy, less flashy but if implemented with integrity and adjusted for improvement, the human capital of the country (especially female) becomes better educated, better fed and intellectually challenged to help themselves.

  • George Alexander

    Having just returned from Zimbabwe earlier this year it was interesting to read this article. What i noted was the lack of sharing of information. In the hyper connected digital world we now live in in the west, it seems strange that the sharing of resources just isn’t there. There just seems to be missing framework.
    I spoke with women farmers, who either farm off instinct, what works and what doesn’t; or hand me down generational information. Some of that information was brilliant. After all much of it revolved around farming in a hot arid climate. Something only really south Europeans can start to begin to understand. It was evident they lacked the science in other aspects. The EU should research into open sourcing ‘modern farming’ science. At the sharp end though even this sometimes wont help, I spoke with one lady who said it could be the best fertilizer in the world, I simply cant afford it….
    I do have a suggestion, we have breeds of chicken that require little to no feed per day. The chickens will forage for there own food. Eating worms, insects etc it will happily free range all day. They wont produce the egg numbers per annum that the commerical hens produce but a respectable 200+ per annum. For little input thats great output. Research from James Madison university has shown that free range eggs when directly compared to eggs from caged hens have more Omega 3’s and more Vitamin E & A. So its a double win. Chicken excrement contains ammonia which makes for fantastic fertilizer.
    Education therefore of women farmers into chicken breed will long term sustainable results across the region.
    James Madison University

springer fachmedien wiesbaden