Asia-Pacific, Civil Society, Combating Desertification and Drought, Conferences, Development & Aid, Environment, Featured, Global, Global Governance, Headlines, IPS UN: Inside the Glasshouse, Poverty & SDGs, Regional Categories, South-South, TerraViva Europe, TerraViva United Nations

‘Deserts Can Save Forests’

Reclamation of desertified, sandified land on either side of the Sudu desert road in Wengniute County, China, is well under way. Credit: Manipadma Jena/IPS

KUBUQI, China, Aug 18 2013 (IPS) - It may take development of the deserts to save forests, say experts, who stress that desert ecology needs to be preserved and enhanced.

“When the time comes that we have to let our forests survive to retain their ecosystem services, eyes would turn for food security and livelihoods to the huge land spaces – the deserts,” Israeli ecologist Uriel N. Safriel told IPS at the Fourth International Desert Forum held in Kubuqi in China.

Dryland scientists the world over are concerned about desertification, which refers mostly to water-related loss of biological productivity in arid and semi-arid lands.

Distinct from natural deserts, in drylands potential evaporation can be 1.5 times higher than precipitation. Unsustainable dryland management practices combined with climate change contribute to man-made deserts.

Expanding at 50,000-70,000 sq km every year, 38 million sq km or about a quarter of all land globally is desertified. This includes 41 percent of cultivable land. This desertification amounts to more than 40 billion dollars in economic loss annually across 110 countries, experts say.

Affected regions are using new and more efficient technologies to make desertified land productive. Israel today is a global leader in desert control and production technologies. Only 17 percent of the country’s land is arable; the rest is desert.

“In Israel, it is said, where the pipeline ends, the desert begins,” said Safriel, from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. He was earlier director of the Jacob Blaustein Institute for Desert Research in Israel and is lead author of several Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assessment reports.

He was referring to the 300-km National Water Carrier Pipeline that transports water from Lake Tiberias in abundant years to be stored in the Coastal Aquifer 200 metres below sea level. The aquifer extends 120 km along the Mediterranean Sea coastline in southwest Israel.

Besides this piped underground storage, the country recycles 90 percent of its domestic waste water to meet 20 percent of its total irrigation needs. Irrigation is computerised to avoid water wastage. The country also makes use of its saline water through drip irrigation for salt-resistant plant varieties.

Additionally, the country has adopted what Safriel calls “a hi-tech detachment from the desert environment.”

Among these practices are hothouses that grow high-value fruits and vegetables for winter export to Europe. These also produce the Haematococus algae in water pipes, whose colourful pigment is used as an additive in fish feed and sells for 2,000 dollars a kg.

So, where a semi-arid region like Australia uses 750 litres of water to produce a kg of wheat, arid Israel uses 50 litres of water to produce a kg of fish – and even this water is reused.

While Israel’s success lies in provisioning of water, China’s efforts in its northern region of Inner Mongolia have concentrated on reforestation and dryland farming.

Situated on its northern border, Inner Mongolia has four of China’s eight deserts. Half, or 60,000 sq km of this mineral-rich region, is desertified today. In the direct line of ferocious spring season sandstorms from Mongolia’s Gobi desert, large swathes of its farmland get devoured every year.

The Elion Resources Group, China’s largest desert ecology enterprise, intends to carve out a 200-km-long and 20-km-wide oasis in the heartland of the 13,000-sq-km Kubuqi desert close to Beijing, in a showcase effort.

The group has planted 1,000 sq km of trees, and developed desert plants such as licorice and salix that are drought-resistant and ecologically efficient.

“It took us a full five years to develop the semi-wild variety – the ‘Liangwai’ licorice medicinal shrub – that could grow well in desert soil,” Wang Wenbiao, the group’s chairman, told IPS.

This greening of the Kubuqi desert has started paying eco-dividends, claims Elion. According to them, rainfall over the past few years averages 300 mm a year, up from 70 mm earlier. The green walls, on the other hand, have helped reduce Kubuqi’s sandstorms to four, from 80 a year in earlier years, they say.

In addition to existing policies on desertification, affected countries need a policy to address shifting sands in addition to existing ones on desertification, Kuwait-based regional dryland scientist Rafaat Fahmy Misak told IPS.

“A third of the fertile Nile delta and 10-30 percent of farmland on the outer boundaries of the oases are today degraded by shifting sand after continuous drought for five years,” he said.

The densely populated 6,000-sq-km Kharga, according to him, is the most attacked oasis in Egypt’s western desert. The shifting sands, he said, obliterate all forms of life and salinate precious water sources.

“Entire villages have been abandoned and people have migrated to new villages more than three times,” he added.

The head of Cairo’s Desert Research Centre, Raafat Khidr, told IPS, “We are fixing shifting sands by growing bio-oil producing jatropha, jojoba and morenga irrigated with treated sewage water. The oil extract residue is used for unconventional poultry and cattle feed.”

Back in Kuwait, Misak has been part of a programme that successfully uses the eco-mat – a sheet made of a mix of river soil, sand, grass seeds and an organic binding, soil fertility enhancer – to combat shifting sands. However, “at two dollars a square metre, it is very expensive,” he said.

Costs, these experts say, are indeed an inhibiting factor.

“For intensive work on mobile sand dunes which involves erection of mechanical barriers to help control sand movement, costs can dramatically escalate up to 4,000 dollars,” Victor R. Squires, an international dryland expert from Adelaide, told IPS. “Higher costs are justified when protecting infrastructure like highways, railways, canals and settlements,” he added.

Scientists also claim that desertification prevention is cheaper than cure. However, wider knowledge about costs of various reclamation techniques remains a grey area. The United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) initiative to calculate policy ‘inaction costs’ goes some way towards providing clarity on the subject.

“Ecuador loses two billion dollars or 12 percent of its annual agricultural GDP to desertification and land degradation, while Guatemala and the Honduras lose 18 percent,” Morales Sigifredo, a Chilean economist working on the measurement of costs of land degradation with the UNCCD, told IPS.

At the Rio+20 summit on sustainable development last year, the assembled gathering had agreed to strive for a Land Degradation Neutral World by 2030. It may be an expensive proposition, but it is necessary, ecologists say.

 
Republish | | Print | |En español


  • Joseph Moore

    I feel this article misses the point and is misleading. It is based upon economically viable crops grown in converted desert. Despite the fact soya, palm oil and a host of other economically viable “crops”, including beef is profitable, as I understand it, due to the productivity only as a result of the climate and fertility availability due to the deforested areas position in the globe (also the inherent soils fertility as a result of the previous forest having been there in the first place). Drylands or deserts generally are not in these productive regions. Medicinal liquorice (note correct spelling) and hot house cash crops, as mentioned in the article, are not a solution to feeding many people and exacerbate climate change due to their transport. Soya, palm oil and beef also are arguably not the best solutions but were chosen as an example of the food paradigm we live within and an hypothetical set of crops which cannot be transferred to a reclaimed desert setting. When is the line drawn between accessing these marginal “dryland” areas or destroying ecologically vulnerable deserts? If it is made economic On another subject how can it even be thought of to continue to grow into deserts unless we delink “economic development” and the use of fossil fuels. Even if “renewable” energies are used to begin land reclamation, these are still resource heavy and require massive extraction from the natural world. The only answer is to stop growing as much as is possible. Full stop. If there is massive effort to produce resource (including food) on the city scale through hand and body power (which slows development and hence resource extraction) to create buildings with longevity and efficiency using a minimum of material, then I think we have a chance to have an economic system which has a limited impact on the natural world. Focusing on dry land remediation is therefore a false and potentially dangerous effort in my opinion. Much better the attitude taken by the group in this article http://www.ipsnews.net/2010/10/brazilian-communities-find-ways-to-live-in-semiarid-environment/ to cohabit alongside (and therefore grow at a much smaller rate if at all).

  • Joseph Moore

    Apologies for some grammatical errors and unfinished sentences due to lack of proof reading. The sentence beginning “If is made an economic decision…” follows that it is likely that it is economically viable then another biome with its own set of endemic fauna in particular will be reduced.

  • Manipadma Jena

    The first and urgent priority in desertifying land is to stabilize the sand so that it does not increasingly engulf productive land. The other, equally important priority is to give back the affected community a sustainable, alternative or adapted source of livelihood. For the latter objective, and as reclamation is heavy investment, it makes sense to grow economic viable crops/ vegetation. The objective however, is not to grow huge quantities of food. China’s reclamation ‘grain for green’ programme over the last 35 years is hugely costly and it is now calling for private investment. Private investment in both desert reclamation and desert development however needs to be regulated (and considerably limited) for sustainable practices. There is wide agreement on this.
    In Inner Mongolia, over-grazing compounded by climate change is acknowledged to be one major reason for desertification. Nomadic herders are being encouraged to take up alternate livelihoods. One of these is to engage them in reclamation work. And, ensuring that the subsequent plantations – of drought resistant vegetation/crops – provide them with a sustainable source of income – some of these in other regions of Inner Mongolia are corn, fruit orchards. http://www.ipsnews.net/2012/07/china-battles-desertification/ In Kubuqi’s climate and soil conditions, the
    above two requirement are met by licorice (kindly check, both spellings are
    correct) and sand willow, among others.
    Is this Kubuqi ‘model’ working? The UN seems to think so. UNEP and
    the UNCCD have signed memoranda of understanding with the local Elion Foundation aiming to improve management of other dryland ecosystems.