Civil Society, Crime & Justice, Democracy, Development & Aid, Economy & Trade, Education, Featured, Gender, Gender Identity, Gender Violence, Global, Global Geopolitics, Global Governance, Globalisation, Headlines, Health, Human Rights, IPS UN: Inside the Glasshouse, Labour, Population, Poverty & SDGs, Projects, Regional Categories, TerraViva United Nations, Trade & Investment | Analysis

Gender

True Gender Equality for Both Women and Men

Joseph Chamie is a former Director of the United Nations Population Division.

UNITED NATIONS, Nov 20 2014 (IPS) - Numerous international and national efforts have focused on gender equality and the empowerment of women. The United Nations, for example, has convened four world conferences on women – Beijing in 1995, Nairobi in 1985, Copenhagen in 1980 and Mexico City in 1975 – and Member States have adopted various international agreements, such as the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW).

Achieving true gender equality, however, requires resolving the many inequities, discriminations and barriers that are encountered by both women and men. Concentrating attention, policies and programmes on the inequalities, biases and obstacles confronting women, while largely ignoring those of men is an unproductive and limited strategy for attaining true gender equality.

In hazardous jobs, such as mining, logging, fishing, iron and steel work, men are the overwhelming majority of workers. Consequently, men are far more likely to suffer a fatal injury or work-related disability than women.
It is important to acknowledge at the very outset that women’s rights and men’s rights are human rights. According to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights and are entitled to life, liberty and security of person.

Moreover, empowering women and men is also an indispensable tool for advancing both human and national development, reducing poverty and improving prospects for future generations.

Men suffer a widely acknowledged disadvantage compared to women with respect to perhaps the most important dimension: longevity. Men have shorter life spans and higher mortality than women at virtually all ages. Males, on average live four years less than females worldwide, five years less in the United States, seven years less in Japan and 10 years less in Russia.

The gender gap is considerable at older ages due to men’s shorter lives. Men are a growing minority across each 10-year age group of the aged population worldwide (Figure 1). For example, men represent 40 percent of those in the age group 80-89 years.

Source: United Nations Population Division.

Source: United Nations Population Division.

In some countries, for example, Austria, China, Italy, Russia, Switzerland and the United Kingdom, statutory retirement ages for men are higher than for women, even though men have fewer potential years for retirement than women. Furthermore, when they meet the same participatory requirements, men receive similar social security benefits as women, without regard to men’s fewer years of retirement.

With respect to education, girls generally outperform boys in most developed countries by receiving better grades and teacher assessments, while having lower school dropout rates than boys. In the crucial area of higher education, women now outnumber men worldwide in both university attendance and graduation.

Regarding childbearing and childrearing, fathers in most industrialised countries generally have little to say about the outcome of a pregnancy even though they will likely incur responsibilities and costs for the child.

Women have the right to choose whether to have an abortion or carry the pregnancy to term, even if the father objects to her decision. Moreover, while women may opt for artificial insemination to have a child, men are generally barred from using surrogacy to have a child.

Men who stay home to raise children are often looked down upon for not financially supporting their families. However, it is still acceptable for women to stay at home and focus on childcare.  Also in contrast to women, men are still expected to enter the labour force early in their lives and are under enormous pressure to be successful providers for the material needs of their families.

Also in cases of divorce in the Western world where child custody is involved, courts most often rule in favour of the mother rather than the father. Moreover, in those instances where the father does receive child custody, he is less likely to receive child support than custodial mothers.

With regard to the occupational structure of most countries, men have to cope with the widely unacknowledged “glass floor”.The glass floor is the invisible barrier limiting the entry of men into the traditional occupations of women, such as pre-school and primary teachers, secretaries/administrative assistants, nurses and medical/dental aides. If gender equality is desired at higher occupational levels, then it is also necessary at lower levels as well.

In hazardous jobs, such as mining, logging, fishing, iron and steel work, men are the overwhelming majority of workers. Consequently, men are far more likely to suffer a fatal injury or work-related disability than women. Moreover, the construction, manufacturing and production sectors are shrinking in many developed countries, resulting in fewer traditional jobs for men.

Concerning sports, boys and men are more often encouraged to participate in more violent activities, such as football, hockey and boxing, than girls and women. As a result, men are at greater risk of suffering serious sports-related injuries and incurring long-term or permanent brain damage.

In armed conflicts both domestic and international, men and boys are more likely to participate in combat than women. Consequently, men suffer more trauma, disability and death than women in such conflicts.

Men have a higher probability of being victims of homicide. Among ethnic minorities, homosexuals and marginalised groups, men are also more likely to experience discrimination, hostility and violence than women. In addition, men are more often incarcerated in jails, prisons and hospitals and serve longer jail terms than women for the same criminal offenses, with women being released earlier on parole than men.

Men are more likely than women to be homeless, often the result of job loss, insufficient income, mental health issues or drug addiction. The consumption of tobacco and alcohol is greater for men than women globally, with men smoking nearly five times as much as women and six percent of male deaths related to alcohol compared to one percent of female deaths.

Also, in most countries more men than women commit suicide. Nevertheless, men are less likely than women to seek help and treatment for alcoholism, substance abuse, mental illness and chronic health problems.

It should be evident that simply focusing attention, policies and programmes on the inequalities and biases that women encounter while largely ignoring those facing men will obstruct and delay efforts to attain gender equality. Achieving true gender equality requires recognising and resolving the inequities, discrimination and barriers that are encountered by both women and men alike.

Edited by Kanya D’Almeida

 
Republish | | Print | |En español


  • lily hidalgo

    Thinking: I always thought there are UN convents/instruments other than the universal declaration of human rights that promote economic, social and cultural rights OF AND FOR ALL . While hardly implemented/subscribed to or recognized among many if not most member-states, are these not sufficient and adequate to
    address men’s rights as well? Gender equality and empowerment of women focused on “… resolving the many inequities, discriminations and barriers that are encountered by both women and men” is I think — rationalized in terms of a holistic and inclusive approach and definition of gender. If so, then why men and women
    only? Why exclude the LGBTs? I thought the focus on women is, as they say because they “carry half of the sky”. And more important, their sheer number anywhere & everywhere — suffering & enduring inequities/discrimination/barriers is just overwhelming — based solely only on the fact they are women (i.e., all females regardless of age). On the other hand, the indicated negative factors suffered by men are not due to or attributed to the fact that they are men. The cited adverse
    situations suffered by men are not due to ingrained cultural values/traditions/ customs & norms of societies/communities nor their unwritten code of conduct, nor enshrined in legal polices, legislations, activities or acts of governments. They are however in general , the adverse consequences of the universal machismo culture
    prevalent anywhere if not everywhere – the roots that prejudice the rights of women and girls. By the way, are economic, social and cultural rights for women only? Perhaps we need to go back to universal codes/instruments formulated by men and ratified by by their governments/states to ensure they also protect men?

  • Syrian Alpechi

    It’s saddening to know such thing. But i don’t think it is part on gender equality but still i know that some women gets advantage on legislation of some countries which is kind of bullshit. instead of making isolated laws or policies regarding of the case of women why not just improve their legislation or enforce it cause the ones that will really suffer are the ones that are really innocent whether they are men or women. For the case of LGBT’s i would still say the same. Or should i ask which gender are you? Are you a man or woman since technology is far as can change genders then that question should be befitted. Though their case is more in the matters of Morality i could say that let them do whatever they want just don’t do anything stupid.

dungeons and dragon books